New Directions In Neuroscience Policy

Teneille R. Brown, Jennifer McCormick

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This article describes some of the diverse areas where neuroscience findings have overlapped with policy and the law and provides concrete questions that policymakers, including judges and lawyers, interest groups, individual lobbyists, and legislators, should answer before relying on neuroscience research. The aim is to inject a little humility into the way neuroscience findings are used by policymakers. The central thesis is that neuroscience findings, particularly those that relate to complex human behavior, must be used with care and caution. Until they are thoroughly vetted through the scientific process, neuroscience findings must be interpreted narrowly and in context, or they risk being abused for political gain. One use of neuroscience would be when research findings lead to the development of a targeted delivery drug that operates on specific faulty mechanisms, completely correcting or alleviating debilitating symptoms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationOxford Handbook of Neuroethics
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780191743948
ISBN (Print)9780199570706
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 21 2012

Fingerprint

Neurosciences
Lawyers
Public Opinion
Research
Direction compound
Pharmaceutical Preparations

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Brown, T. R., & McCormick, J. (2012). New Directions In Neuroscience Policy. In Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199570706.013.0155
Brown, Teneille R. ; McCormick, Jennifer. / New Directions In Neuroscience Policy. Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics. Oxford University Press, 2012.
@inbook{3bf67e25fb5449b5a36a8f94cf1ff264,
title = "New Directions In Neuroscience Policy",
abstract = "This article describes some of the diverse areas where neuroscience findings have overlapped with policy and the law and provides concrete questions that policymakers, including judges and lawyers, interest groups, individual lobbyists, and legislators, should answer before relying on neuroscience research. The aim is to inject a little humility into the way neuroscience findings are used by policymakers. The central thesis is that neuroscience findings, particularly those that relate to complex human behavior, must be used with care and caution. Until they are thoroughly vetted through the scientific process, neuroscience findings must be interpreted narrowly and in context, or they risk being abused for political gain. One use of neuroscience would be when research findings lead to the development of a targeted delivery drug that operates on specific faulty mechanisms, completely correcting or alleviating debilitating symptoms.",
author = "Brown, {Teneille R.} and Jennifer McCormick",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199570706.013.0155",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780199570706",
booktitle = "Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Brown, TR & McCormick, J 2012, New Directions In Neuroscience Policy. in Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199570706.013.0155

New Directions In Neuroscience Policy. / Brown, Teneille R.; McCormick, Jennifer.

Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics. Oxford University Press, 2012.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - New Directions In Neuroscience Policy

AU - Brown, Teneille R.

AU - McCormick, Jennifer

PY - 2012/11/21

Y1 - 2012/11/21

N2 - This article describes some of the diverse areas where neuroscience findings have overlapped with policy and the law and provides concrete questions that policymakers, including judges and lawyers, interest groups, individual lobbyists, and legislators, should answer before relying on neuroscience research. The aim is to inject a little humility into the way neuroscience findings are used by policymakers. The central thesis is that neuroscience findings, particularly those that relate to complex human behavior, must be used with care and caution. Until they are thoroughly vetted through the scientific process, neuroscience findings must be interpreted narrowly and in context, or they risk being abused for political gain. One use of neuroscience would be when research findings lead to the development of a targeted delivery drug that operates on specific faulty mechanisms, completely correcting or alleviating debilitating symptoms.

AB - This article describes some of the diverse areas where neuroscience findings have overlapped with policy and the law and provides concrete questions that policymakers, including judges and lawyers, interest groups, individual lobbyists, and legislators, should answer before relying on neuroscience research. The aim is to inject a little humility into the way neuroscience findings are used by policymakers. The central thesis is that neuroscience findings, particularly those that relate to complex human behavior, must be used with care and caution. Until they are thoroughly vetted through the scientific process, neuroscience findings must be interpreted narrowly and in context, or they risk being abused for political gain. One use of neuroscience would be when research findings lead to the development of a targeted delivery drug that operates on specific faulty mechanisms, completely correcting or alleviating debilitating symptoms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066705144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066705144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199570706.013.0155

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199570706.013.0155

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85066705144

SN - 9780199570706

BT - Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -

Brown TR, McCormick J. New Directions In Neuroscience Policy. In Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics. Oxford University Press. 2012 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199570706.013.0155