New empirical strategies for the study of parliamentary government formation

Garrett Glasgow, Matt Golder, Sona N. Golder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

In recent years, a consensus has developed that the conditional logit (CL) model is the most appropriate strategy for modeling government choice. In this paper, we reconsider this approach and make three methodological contributions. First, we employ a mixed logit with random coefficients that allows us to take account of unobserved heterogeneity in the government formation process and relax the independence of irrelevant alternatives (IIA) assumption. Second, we demonstrate that the procedure used in the literature to test the IIA assumption is biased against finding IIA violations. An improved testing procedure reveals clear evidence of IIA violations, indicating that the CL model is inappropriate. Third, we move beyond simply presenting the sign and significance of model coefficients, suggesting various strategies for interpreting the substantive influence of variables in models of government choice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)248-270
Number of pages23
JournalPolitical Analysis
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2012

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'New empirical strategies for the study of parliamentary government formation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this