No hard evidence on ultrasound-guided versus conventional regional anesthesia

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

1 Citation (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalRegional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
Volume34
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2009

Fingerprint

Interventional Ultrasonography
Conduction Anesthesia
Evidence-Based Medicine
Analgesia

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

@article{cd95d9f1128b4ff285054ec886dc8c0c,
title = "No hard evidence on ultrasound-guided versus conventional regional anesthesia",
author = "Michael Andreae",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181b4cd8d",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
journal = "Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine",
issn = "1098-7339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

No hard evidence on ultrasound-guided versus conventional regional anesthesia. / Andreae, Michael.

In: Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Vol. 34, No. 5, 01.09.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

TY - JOUR

T1 - No hard evidence on ultrasound-guided versus conventional regional anesthesia

AU - Andreae, Michael

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74549139090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74549139090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181b4cd8d

DO - 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181b4cd8d

M3 - Letter

C2 - 19749599

AN - SCOPUS:74549139090

VL - 34

JO - Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

JF - Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

SN - 1098-7339

IS - 5

ER -