No-Opinion Filters and Attitude Measurement Reliability

McKee J. McClendon, Duane F. Alwin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Many survey researchers believe that the quality of answers to attitude questions may be improved by using no-opinion filters to remove those responses that are not based on true opinions. The authors investigate whether reliability, one aspect of data quality, is greater for filtered questions. Split-ballot experiments from two telephone surveys of the Akron, Ohio metropolitan area are used to estimate the effect of filtered questions on the reliability of items from Srole's anomia scale, Rosenberg's self-esteem scale, and a scale of attitudes toward lawyers. There is no evidence that filtered questions improve reliability, and in the case of self-esteem, reliability may be reduced on the filtered form.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)438-464
Number of pages27
JournalSociological Methods & Research
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1993

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'No-Opinion Filters and Attitude Measurement Reliability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this