Normative concerns for endurance athletes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Endurance athletes work at creating habits and lifestyles which correspond to Aristotle’s notion of eudomania (human flourishing). They spend time and energy dedicating themselves to their craft. They relinquish other interests in pursuit of excellence. They fully accept William James’ notion of precipitousness as they create goals and work toward achievement. In this paper, we examine normative issues related to endurance sport participation, the potential dark side of this pursuit of excellence. Our overriding concern is how best to work toward and experience human flourishing while simultaneously remaining attentive to relationships and responsibilities. In terms of potential perils associated with endurance sport, we address questions of autonomy, authenticity and identification. We contend that endurance athletes concerned with these questions benefit from transcendental and pragmatic notions of the good life.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)335-349
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of the Philosophy of Sport
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

endurance
athlete
Athletes
Sports
Habits
Life Style
authenticity
habits
pragmatics
autonomy
energy
responsibility
participation
experience
Identification (Psychology)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{bffd65789af3460ab7b08269da5b9b67,
title = "Normative concerns for endurance athletes",
abstract = "Endurance athletes work at creating habits and lifestyles which correspond to Aristotle’s notion of eudomania (human flourishing). They spend time and energy dedicating themselves to their craft. They relinquish other interests in pursuit of excellence. They fully accept William James’ notion of precipitousness as they create goals and work toward achievement. In this paper, we examine normative issues related to endurance sport participation, the potential dark side of this pursuit of excellence. Our overriding concern is how best to work toward and experience human flourishing while simultaneously remaining attentive to relationships and responsibilities. In terms of potential perils associated with endurance sport, we address questions of autonomy, authenticity and identification. We contend that endurance athletes concerned with these questions benefit from transcendental and pragmatic notions of the good life.",
author = "Douglas Hochstetler and Hopsicker, {Peter Matthew}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00948705.2016.1163226",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "335--349",
journal = "Journal of the Philosophy of Sport",
issn = "0094-8705",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Normative concerns for endurance athletes. / Hochstetler, Douglas; Hopsicker, Peter Matthew.

In: Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, Vol. 43, No. 3, 01.09.2016, p. 335-349.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Normative concerns for endurance athletes

AU - Hochstetler, Douglas

AU - Hopsicker, Peter Matthew

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Endurance athletes work at creating habits and lifestyles which correspond to Aristotle’s notion of eudomania (human flourishing). They spend time and energy dedicating themselves to their craft. They relinquish other interests in pursuit of excellence. They fully accept William James’ notion of precipitousness as they create goals and work toward achievement. In this paper, we examine normative issues related to endurance sport participation, the potential dark side of this pursuit of excellence. Our overriding concern is how best to work toward and experience human flourishing while simultaneously remaining attentive to relationships and responsibilities. In terms of potential perils associated with endurance sport, we address questions of autonomy, authenticity and identification. We contend that endurance athletes concerned with these questions benefit from transcendental and pragmatic notions of the good life.

AB - Endurance athletes work at creating habits and lifestyles which correspond to Aristotle’s notion of eudomania (human flourishing). They spend time and energy dedicating themselves to their craft. They relinquish other interests in pursuit of excellence. They fully accept William James’ notion of precipitousness as they create goals and work toward achievement. In this paper, we examine normative issues related to endurance sport participation, the potential dark side of this pursuit of excellence. Our overriding concern is how best to work toward and experience human flourishing while simultaneously remaining attentive to relationships and responsibilities. In terms of potential perils associated with endurance sport, we address questions of autonomy, authenticity and identification. We contend that endurance athletes concerned with these questions benefit from transcendental and pragmatic notions of the good life.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977261684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977261684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00948705.2016.1163226

DO - 10.1080/00948705.2016.1163226

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84977261684

VL - 43

SP - 335

EP - 349

JO - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport

JF - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport

SN - 0094-8705

IS - 3

ER -