Not a right but a public function: The debate in the French National Assembly over the 1872 law on jury formation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Because of the highly politicized nature of the French judicial system in the nineteenth century, laws governing the selection of jurors were often the subject of strong political debate. There were repeated controversies over which citizens should be jurors and which authorities should draw up the annual jury lists from which the trial panels were drawn. Perhaps no event better reflected the nature of the controversy than the debate which occurred in the National Assembly in 1872, when the conservative government proposed an act which gave the judiciary power to revise the annual jury lists drawn up by elected officials. However, liberal deputies opposed the act because they maintained it gave too much power to a conservative judiciary in determining which citizens should be jurors. The debate in fact went to the heart of the nineteenth-century struggle between the Right and Left.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)395-410
Number of pages16
JournalFrench History
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2007

Fingerprint

National Assembly
Jurors
Juries
Judiciary
Political Debate
Authority
Deputies
Government

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History

Cite this

@article{fb4d75ca556241bfaf68aca5e5b1317e,
title = "Not a right but a public function: The debate in the French National Assembly over the 1872 law on jury formation",
abstract = "Because of the highly politicized nature of the French judicial system in the nineteenth century, laws governing the selection of jurors were often the subject of strong political debate. There were repeated controversies over which citizens should be jurors and which authorities should draw up the annual jury lists from which the trial panels were drawn. Perhaps no event better reflected the nature of the controversy than the debate which occurred in the National Assembly in 1872, when the conservative government proposed an act which gave the judiciary power to revise the annual jury lists drawn up by elected officials. However, liberal deputies opposed the act because they maintained it gave too much power to a conservative judiciary in determining which citizens should be jurors. The debate in fact went to the heart of the nineteenth-century struggle between the Right and Left.",
author = "Donovan, {James M.}",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/fh/crm052",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "395--410",
journal = "French History",
issn = "0269-1191",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

Not a right but a public function : The debate in the French National Assembly over the 1872 law on jury formation. / Donovan, James M.

In: French History, Vol. 21, No. 4, 01.12.2007, p. 395-410.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Not a right but a public function

T2 - The debate in the French National Assembly over the 1872 law on jury formation

AU - Donovan, James M.

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - Because of the highly politicized nature of the French judicial system in the nineteenth century, laws governing the selection of jurors were often the subject of strong political debate. There were repeated controversies over which citizens should be jurors and which authorities should draw up the annual jury lists from which the trial panels were drawn. Perhaps no event better reflected the nature of the controversy than the debate which occurred in the National Assembly in 1872, when the conservative government proposed an act which gave the judiciary power to revise the annual jury lists drawn up by elected officials. However, liberal deputies opposed the act because they maintained it gave too much power to a conservative judiciary in determining which citizens should be jurors. The debate in fact went to the heart of the nineteenth-century struggle between the Right and Left.

AB - Because of the highly politicized nature of the French judicial system in the nineteenth century, laws governing the selection of jurors were often the subject of strong political debate. There were repeated controversies over which citizens should be jurors and which authorities should draw up the annual jury lists from which the trial panels were drawn. Perhaps no event better reflected the nature of the controversy than the debate which occurred in the National Assembly in 1872, when the conservative government proposed an act which gave the judiciary power to revise the annual jury lists drawn up by elected officials. However, liberal deputies opposed the act because they maintained it gave too much power to a conservative judiciary in determining which citizens should be jurors. The debate in fact went to the heart of the nineteenth-century struggle between the Right and Left.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62849091583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62849091583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/fh/crm052

DO - 10.1093/fh/crm052

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:62849091583

VL - 21

SP - 395

EP - 410

JO - French History

JF - French History

SN - 0269-1191

IS - 4

ER -