Not like me: Self vs. other distinctions in first-person perception

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The third-person perception hypothesis posits that people believe others are more influenced by media messages than they are. The existing literature consistently documents that individuals make self vs. other distinctions when assessing media effects, but not how such distinctions are made. The current study sought to document the self/ other distinction in third-person perception and to assess differences in how individuals separate their own personal risk from that of others. Findings of a survey of 180 urban minority youth confirm the presence of third-person perception and significant self/other distinctions in media effects. A clear split between cognitive and social predictors emerged when assessing differences in self/other distinctions. Participants relied on cognitive factors when assessing their own risk, while relying more heavily on self-esteem when assessing the relative risk of others. Liking and trust of the media was the only shared correlate of self/other distinctions in third-person perception.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)320-330
Number of pages11
JournalCommunication Research Reports
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

human being
cognitive factors
self-esteem
minority

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication

Cite this

@article{bf993452cedf4ffb8d4cf646d31bb592,
title = "Not like me: Self vs. other distinctions in first-person perception",
abstract = "The third-person perception hypothesis posits that people believe others are more influenced by media messages than they are. The existing literature consistently documents that individuals make self vs. other distinctions when assessing media effects, but not how such distinctions are made. The current study sought to document the self/ other distinction in third-person perception and to assess differences in how individuals separate their own personal risk from that of others. Findings of a survey of 180 urban minority youth confirm the presence of third-person perception and significant self/other distinctions in media effects. A clear split between cognitive and social predictors emerged when assessing differences in self/other distinctions. Participants relied on cognitive factors when assessing their own risk, while relying more heavily on self-esteem when assessing the relative risk of others. Liking and trust of the media was the only shared correlate of self/other distinctions in third-person perception.",
author = "Chapin, {John R.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08824090009388779",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "320--330",
journal = "Communication Research Reports",
issn = "0882-4096",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Not like me : Self vs. other distinctions in first-person perception. / Chapin, John R.

In: Communication Research Reports, Vol. 17, No. 3, 01.01.2000, p. 320-330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Not like me

T2 - Self vs. other distinctions in first-person perception

AU - Chapin, John R.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - The third-person perception hypothesis posits that people believe others are more influenced by media messages than they are. The existing literature consistently documents that individuals make self vs. other distinctions when assessing media effects, but not how such distinctions are made. The current study sought to document the self/ other distinction in third-person perception and to assess differences in how individuals separate their own personal risk from that of others. Findings of a survey of 180 urban minority youth confirm the presence of third-person perception and significant self/other distinctions in media effects. A clear split between cognitive and social predictors emerged when assessing differences in self/other distinctions. Participants relied on cognitive factors when assessing their own risk, while relying more heavily on self-esteem when assessing the relative risk of others. Liking and trust of the media was the only shared correlate of self/other distinctions in third-person perception.

AB - The third-person perception hypothesis posits that people believe others are more influenced by media messages than they are. The existing literature consistently documents that individuals make self vs. other distinctions when assessing media effects, but not how such distinctions are made. The current study sought to document the self/ other distinction in third-person perception and to assess differences in how individuals separate their own personal risk from that of others. Findings of a survey of 180 urban minority youth confirm the presence of third-person perception and significant self/other distinctions in media effects. A clear split between cognitive and social predictors emerged when assessing differences in self/other distinctions. Participants relied on cognitive factors when assessing their own risk, while relying more heavily on self-esteem when assessing the relative risk of others. Liking and trust of the media was the only shared correlate of self/other distinctions in third-person perception.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642366161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642366161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08824090009388779

DO - 10.1080/08824090009388779

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:1642366161

VL - 17

SP - 320

EP - 330

JO - Communication Research Reports

JF - Communication Research Reports

SN - 0882-4096

IS - 3

ER -