Nuclear deterrence in a multipolar world: The U.S., Russia and security challenges

Research output: Book/ReportBook

Abstract

Nuclear weapons survived the end of the Cold War and the demise of the Soviet Union, but their role in the post-Cold War and twenty-first century worlds will be markedly different from the twentieth century experience. The Cold War, despite some dangerous episodes in U.S.-Soviet relations, was for the most part conducted under two important restraints. The first restraint was the strategic nuclear bipolarity that dominated the international system. The United States (plus NATO) and the Soviet Union dominated the development of military-strategic thinking related to the use of nuclear weapons for deterrence. They also led the way in developing and deploying nuclear technology for military purposes. As a result, the U.S. and the Soviet Union cast shadows over other powers, including other nuclear weapons states, that inhibited nuclear adventurism and irresponsible nuclear saber rattling. Other nuclear weapons states and nuclear aspiring countries knew that, if push came to shove, the United States and the Soviet Union had "escalation dominance" within their respective regions and spheres of influence. The Suez crisis of 1956 drove home this point, about nuclear-strategic bipolarity as a reality of the Cold War international system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
PublisherTaylor and Francis Inc.
Number of pages235
ISBN (Electronic)9781317086505
ISBN (Print)9781472480910
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 5 2017

Fingerprint

nuclear weapon
deterrence
cold war
USSR
Russia
international system
Military
escalation
NATO
twenty-first century
twentieth century
experience

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

@book{2533d3d1f8a04ba3a13b619e43770643,
title = "Nuclear deterrence in a multipolar world: The U.S., Russia and security challenges",
abstract = "Nuclear weapons survived the end of the Cold War and the demise of the Soviet Union, but their role in the post-Cold War and twenty-first century worlds will be markedly different from the twentieth century experience. The Cold War, despite some dangerous episodes in U.S.-Soviet relations, was for the most part conducted under two important restraints. The first restraint was the strategic nuclear bipolarity that dominated the international system. The United States (plus NATO) and the Soviet Union dominated the development of military-strategic thinking related to the use of nuclear weapons for deterrence. They also led the way in developing and deploying nuclear technology for military purposes. As a result, the U.S. and the Soviet Union cast shadows over other powers, including other nuclear weapons states, that inhibited nuclear adventurism and irresponsible nuclear saber rattling. Other nuclear weapons states and nuclear aspiring countries knew that, if push came to shove, the United States and the Soviet Union had {"}escalation dominance{"} within their respective regions and spheres of influence. The Suez crisis of 1956 drove home this point, about nuclear-strategic bipolarity as a reality of the Cold War international system.",
author = "Stephen Cimbala",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "5",
doi = "10.4324/9781315598611",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781472480910",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Inc.",

}

Nuclear deterrence in a multipolar world : The U.S., Russia and security challenges. / Cimbala, Stephen.

Taylor and Francis Inc., 2017. 235 p.

Research output: Book/ReportBook

TY - BOOK

T1 - Nuclear deterrence in a multipolar world

T2 - The U.S., Russia and security challenges

AU - Cimbala, Stephen

PY - 2017/7/5

Y1 - 2017/7/5

N2 - Nuclear weapons survived the end of the Cold War and the demise of the Soviet Union, but their role in the post-Cold War and twenty-first century worlds will be markedly different from the twentieth century experience. The Cold War, despite some dangerous episodes in U.S.-Soviet relations, was for the most part conducted under two important restraints. The first restraint was the strategic nuclear bipolarity that dominated the international system. The United States (plus NATO) and the Soviet Union dominated the development of military-strategic thinking related to the use of nuclear weapons for deterrence. They also led the way in developing and deploying nuclear technology for military purposes. As a result, the U.S. and the Soviet Union cast shadows over other powers, including other nuclear weapons states, that inhibited nuclear adventurism and irresponsible nuclear saber rattling. Other nuclear weapons states and nuclear aspiring countries knew that, if push came to shove, the United States and the Soviet Union had "escalation dominance" within their respective regions and spheres of influence. The Suez crisis of 1956 drove home this point, about nuclear-strategic bipolarity as a reality of the Cold War international system.

AB - Nuclear weapons survived the end of the Cold War and the demise of the Soviet Union, but their role in the post-Cold War and twenty-first century worlds will be markedly different from the twentieth century experience. The Cold War, despite some dangerous episodes in U.S.-Soviet relations, was for the most part conducted under two important restraints. The first restraint was the strategic nuclear bipolarity that dominated the international system. The United States (plus NATO) and the Soviet Union dominated the development of military-strategic thinking related to the use of nuclear weapons for deterrence. They also led the way in developing and deploying nuclear technology for military purposes. As a result, the U.S. and the Soviet Union cast shadows over other powers, including other nuclear weapons states, that inhibited nuclear adventurism and irresponsible nuclear saber rattling. Other nuclear weapons states and nuclear aspiring countries knew that, if push came to shove, the United States and the Soviet Union had "escalation dominance" within their respective regions and spheres of influence. The Suez crisis of 1956 drove home this point, about nuclear-strategic bipolarity as a reality of the Cold War international system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031856786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031856786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315598611

DO - 10.4324/9781315598611

M3 - Book

AN - SCOPUS:85031856786

SN - 9781472480910

BT - Nuclear deterrence in a multipolar world

PB - Taylor and Francis Inc.

ER -