Numerical validation of the squire-young formula for profile-drag prediction

James G. Coder, Mark David Maughmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Squire-Young formula is widely used to calculate profile drag in two-dimensional airfoil analyses. Although experience shows that the formula provides reasonable and accurate predictions, full Navier-Stokes computational fluid dynamics allows for a numerical validation of the formula. A method is presented for evaluating the Squire-Young formula from a computational fluid dynamics solution, and demonstrated for several airfoils. The agreement between profile-drag coefficients determined using the Squire-Young formula and those calculated directly from the computational fluid dynamics solution using surface integration is typically within 2-3% in the low-drag range, with error increasing at higher lift coefficients. The applicability of the underlying assumptions is discussed, and the validityof the assumed variationof shape factor and edge velocity in the wakeis investigated for asymmetric airfoil at zero lift. The formula is also demonstrated as being insensitive to spurious drag that may occur due to far-field boundary conditions. Finally, a derivation of the Squire-Young formula is included to further aid in understanding the influence of its assumptions on its predictions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)948-955
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Aircraft
Volume52
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Airfoils
Drag
Computational fluid dynamics
Drag coefficient
Boundary conditions

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Aerospace Engineering

Cite this

@article{c43b8092a9ec41aa8bad8b3e406d7523,
title = "Numerical validation of the squire-young formula for profile-drag prediction",
abstract = "The Squire-Young formula is widely used to calculate profile drag in two-dimensional airfoil analyses. Although experience shows that the formula provides reasonable and accurate predictions, full Navier-Stokes computational fluid dynamics allows for a numerical validation of the formula. A method is presented for evaluating the Squire-Young formula from a computational fluid dynamics solution, and demonstrated for several airfoils. The agreement between profile-drag coefficients determined using the Squire-Young formula and those calculated directly from the computational fluid dynamics solution using surface integration is typically within 2-3{\%} in the low-drag range, with error increasing at higher lift coefficients. The applicability of the underlying assumptions is discussed, and the validityof the assumed variationof shape factor and edge velocity in the wakeis investigated for asymmetric airfoil at zero lift. The formula is also demonstrated as being insensitive to spurious drag that may occur due to far-field boundary conditions. Finally, a derivation of the Squire-Young formula is included to further aid in understanding the influence of its assumptions on its predictions.",
author = "Coder, {James G.} and Maughmer, {Mark David}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2514/1.C033021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "948--955",
journal = "Journal of Aircraft",
issn = "0021-8669",
publisher = "American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (AIAA)",
number = "3",

}

Numerical validation of the squire-young formula for profile-drag prediction. / Coder, James G.; Maughmer, Mark David.

In: Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 52, No. 3, 01.01.2015, p. 948-955.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Numerical validation of the squire-young formula for profile-drag prediction

AU - Coder, James G.

AU - Maughmer, Mark David

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The Squire-Young formula is widely used to calculate profile drag in two-dimensional airfoil analyses. Although experience shows that the formula provides reasonable and accurate predictions, full Navier-Stokes computational fluid dynamics allows for a numerical validation of the formula. A method is presented for evaluating the Squire-Young formula from a computational fluid dynamics solution, and demonstrated for several airfoils. The agreement between profile-drag coefficients determined using the Squire-Young formula and those calculated directly from the computational fluid dynamics solution using surface integration is typically within 2-3% in the low-drag range, with error increasing at higher lift coefficients. The applicability of the underlying assumptions is discussed, and the validityof the assumed variationof shape factor and edge velocity in the wakeis investigated for asymmetric airfoil at zero lift. The formula is also demonstrated as being insensitive to spurious drag that may occur due to far-field boundary conditions. Finally, a derivation of the Squire-Young formula is included to further aid in understanding the influence of its assumptions on its predictions.

AB - The Squire-Young formula is widely used to calculate profile drag in two-dimensional airfoil analyses. Although experience shows that the formula provides reasonable and accurate predictions, full Navier-Stokes computational fluid dynamics allows for a numerical validation of the formula. A method is presented for evaluating the Squire-Young formula from a computational fluid dynamics solution, and demonstrated for several airfoils. The agreement between profile-drag coefficients determined using the Squire-Young formula and those calculated directly from the computational fluid dynamics solution using surface integration is typically within 2-3% in the low-drag range, with error increasing at higher lift coefficients. The applicability of the underlying assumptions is discussed, and the validityof the assumed variationof shape factor and edge velocity in the wakeis investigated for asymmetric airfoil at zero lift. The formula is also demonstrated as being insensitive to spurious drag that may occur due to far-field boundary conditions. Finally, a derivation of the Squire-Young formula is included to further aid in understanding the influence of its assumptions on its predictions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964887547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964887547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2514/1.C033021

DO - 10.2514/1.C033021

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 948

EP - 955

JO - Journal of Aircraft

JF - Journal of Aircraft

SN - 0021-8669

IS - 3

ER -