Nurses and nursing assistants decision-making regarding use of safe patient handling and mobility technology: A qualitative study

Mary Lou Kanaskie, Cynthia Snyder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim This study explored decision-making regarding use of safe patient handling and mobility (SPHM) technology among registered nurses (RN) and nursing assistants (NA). Background Lifting injuries are common among healthcare workers. Despite development of standards for SPHM, the introduction of regulation for monitoring access to SPHM technology, and implementation of education programs and process improvements, threat of injury remains a concern. Although access to SPHM equipment is associated with decreased workplace injuries, access alone does not guarantee use. Questions remain concerning how healthcare workers make decisions to use SPHM equipment, and how they weigh decisions against personal safety. Methods A qualitative descriptive study was conducted. Data collection consisted of four 60 min focus groups. Two focus groups consisted of all RNs (n = 14) and two consisted of all NAs (n = 11). Each focus group was audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were coded, repeating concepts identified, and codes collapsed into themes and subthemes. Results Qualitative analysis revealed three major themes: barriers to use, perceived risk, and coordination of care. Barriers to use include subthemes of physical barriers, knowledge and skill, and unit culture. Perceived risk includes patient risk and perceived risk to self. Coordination of care includes patient factors and characteristics, assessment of patient needs and abilities, and interprofessional collaboration. Conclusions These findings provide new knowledge about the complexity of decision making among care providers in the use of SPHM technology. Interprofessional team approaches to patient assessment and care are important components of confident decision making in use of SPHM technology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)141-147
Number of pages7
JournalApplied Nursing Research
Volume39
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

Moving and Lifting Patients
Decision Making
Nursing
Nurses
Technology
Focus Groups
Patient Care
Wounds and Injuries
Delivery of Health Care
Equipment and Supplies
Architectural Accessibility
Aptitude
Needs Assessment
Workplace
Safety
Education

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

@article{323183f3d68442c2a85b80c690f0da8b,
title = "Nurses and nursing assistants decision-making regarding use of safe patient handling and mobility technology: A qualitative study",
abstract = "Aim This study explored decision-making regarding use of safe patient handling and mobility (SPHM) technology among registered nurses (RN) and nursing assistants (NA). Background Lifting injuries are common among healthcare workers. Despite development of standards for SPHM, the introduction of regulation for monitoring access to SPHM technology, and implementation of education programs and process improvements, threat of injury remains a concern. Although access to SPHM equipment is associated with decreased workplace injuries, access alone does not guarantee use. Questions remain concerning how healthcare workers make decisions to use SPHM equipment, and how they weigh decisions against personal safety. Methods A qualitative descriptive study was conducted. Data collection consisted of four 60 min focus groups. Two focus groups consisted of all RNs (n = 14) and two consisted of all NAs (n = 11). Each focus group was audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were coded, repeating concepts identified, and codes collapsed into themes and subthemes. Results Qualitative analysis revealed three major themes: barriers to use, perceived risk, and coordination of care. Barriers to use include subthemes of physical barriers, knowledge and skill, and unit culture. Perceived risk includes patient risk and perceived risk to self. Coordination of care includes patient factors and characteristics, assessment of patient needs and abilities, and interprofessional collaboration. Conclusions These findings provide new knowledge about the complexity of decision making among care providers in the use of SPHM technology. Interprofessional team approaches to patient assessment and care are important components of confident decision making in use of SPHM technology.",
author = "Kanaskie, {Mary Lou} and Cynthia Snyder",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.apnr.2017.11.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "141--147",
journal = "Applied Nursing Research",
issn = "0897-1897",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nurses and nursing assistants decision-making regarding use of safe patient handling and mobility technology

T2 - A qualitative study

AU - Kanaskie, Mary Lou

AU - Snyder, Cynthia

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Aim This study explored decision-making regarding use of safe patient handling and mobility (SPHM) technology among registered nurses (RN) and nursing assistants (NA). Background Lifting injuries are common among healthcare workers. Despite development of standards for SPHM, the introduction of regulation for monitoring access to SPHM technology, and implementation of education programs and process improvements, threat of injury remains a concern. Although access to SPHM equipment is associated with decreased workplace injuries, access alone does not guarantee use. Questions remain concerning how healthcare workers make decisions to use SPHM equipment, and how they weigh decisions against personal safety. Methods A qualitative descriptive study was conducted. Data collection consisted of four 60 min focus groups. Two focus groups consisted of all RNs (n = 14) and two consisted of all NAs (n = 11). Each focus group was audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were coded, repeating concepts identified, and codes collapsed into themes and subthemes. Results Qualitative analysis revealed three major themes: barriers to use, perceived risk, and coordination of care. Barriers to use include subthemes of physical barriers, knowledge and skill, and unit culture. Perceived risk includes patient risk and perceived risk to self. Coordination of care includes patient factors and characteristics, assessment of patient needs and abilities, and interprofessional collaboration. Conclusions These findings provide new knowledge about the complexity of decision making among care providers in the use of SPHM technology. Interprofessional team approaches to patient assessment and care are important components of confident decision making in use of SPHM technology.

AB - Aim This study explored decision-making regarding use of safe patient handling and mobility (SPHM) technology among registered nurses (RN) and nursing assistants (NA). Background Lifting injuries are common among healthcare workers. Despite development of standards for SPHM, the introduction of regulation for monitoring access to SPHM technology, and implementation of education programs and process improvements, threat of injury remains a concern. Although access to SPHM equipment is associated with decreased workplace injuries, access alone does not guarantee use. Questions remain concerning how healthcare workers make decisions to use SPHM equipment, and how they weigh decisions against personal safety. Methods A qualitative descriptive study was conducted. Data collection consisted of four 60 min focus groups. Two focus groups consisted of all RNs (n = 14) and two consisted of all NAs (n = 11). Each focus group was audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were coded, repeating concepts identified, and codes collapsed into themes and subthemes. Results Qualitative analysis revealed three major themes: barriers to use, perceived risk, and coordination of care. Barriers to use include subthemes of physical barriers, knowledge and skill, and unit culture. Perceived risk includes patient risk and perceived risk to self. Coordination of care includes patient factors and characteristics, assessment of patient needs and abilities, and interprofessional collaboration. Conclusions These findings provide new knowledge about the complexity of decision making among care providers in the use of SPHM technology. Interprofessional team approaches to patient assessment and care are important components of confident decision making in use of SPHM technology.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033386657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033386657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apnr.2017.11.006

DO - 10.1016/j.apnr.2017.11.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 29422149

AN - SCOPUS:85033386657

VL - 39

SP - 141

EP - 147

JO - Applied Nursing Research

JF - Applied Nursing Research

SN - 0897-1897

ER -