Nurture net of nature

Re-evaluating the role of shared environments in academic achievement and verbal intelligence

Jonathan Kyle Daw, Guang Guo, Kathie Mullan Harris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prominent authors in the behavioral genetics tradition have long argued that shared environments do not meaningfully shape intelligence and academic achievement. However, we argue that these conclusions are erroneous due to large violations of the additivity assumption underlying behavioral genetics methods - that sources of genetic and shared and nonshared environmental variance are independent and non-interactive. This is compounded in some cases by the theoretical equation of the effective and objective environments, where the former is defined by whether siblings are made more or less similar, and the latter by whether siblings are equally subject to the environmental characteristic in question. Using monozygotic twin fixed effects models, which compare outcomes among genetically identical pairs, we show that many characteristics of objectively shared environments significantly moderate the effects of nonshared environments on adolescent academic achievement and verbal intelligence, violating the additivity assumption of behavioral genetic methods. Importantly, these effects would be categorized as nonshared environmental influences in standard twin models despite their roots in shared environments. These findings should encourage caution among those who claim that the frequently trivial variance attributed to shared environments in behavioral genetic models means that families, schools, and neighborhoods do not meaningfully influence these outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)422-439
Number of pages18
JournalSocial Science Research
Volume52
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

academic achievement
intelligence
adolescent
school

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{90f7ebdfceb2455db5a2ea5d67cb41ee,
title = "Nurture net of nature: Re-evaluating the role of shared environments in academic achievement and verbal intelligence",
abstract = "Prominent authors in the behavioral genetics tradition have long argued that shared environments do not meaningfully shape intelligence and academic achievement. However, we argue that these conclusions are erroneous due to large violations of the additivity assumption underlying behavioral genetics methods - that sources of genetic and shared and nonshared environmental variance are independent and non-interactive. This is compounded in some cases by the theoretical equation of the effective and objective environments, where the former is defined by whether siblings are made more or less similar, and the latter by whether siblings are equally subject to the environmental characteristic in question. Using monozygotic twin fixed effects models, which compare outcomes among genetically identical pairs, we show that many characteristics of objectively shared environments significantly moderate the effects of nonshared environments on adolescent academic achievement and verbal intelligence, violating the additivity assumption of behavioral genetic methods. Importantly, these effects would be categorized as nonshared environmental influences in standard twin models despite their roots in shared environments. These findings should encourage caution among those who claim that the frequently trivial variance attributed to shared environments in behavioral genetic models means that families, schools, and neighborhoods do not meaningfully influence these outcomes.",
author = "Daw, {Jonathan Kyle} and Guang Guo and Harris, {Kathie Mullan}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.02.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "422--439",
journal = "Social Science Research",
issn = "0049-089X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Nurture net of nature : Re-evaluating the role of shared environments in academic achievement and verbal intelligence. / Daw, Jonathan Kyle; Guo, Guang; Harris, Kathie Mullan.

In: Social Science Research, Vol. 52, 01.07.2015, p. 422-439.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nurture net of nature

T2 - Re-evaluating the role of shared environments in academic achievement and verbal intelligence

AU - Daw, Jonathan Kyle

AU - Guo, Guang

AU - Harris, Kathie Mullan

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Prominent authors in the behavioral genetics tradition have long argued that shared environments do not meaningfully shape intelligence and academic achievement. However, we argue that these conclusions are erroneous due to large violations of the additivity assumption underlying behavioral genetics methods - that sources of genetic and shared and nonshared environmental variance are independent and non-interactive. This is compounded in some cases by the theoretical equation of the effective and objective environments, where the former is defined by whether siblings are made more or less similar, and the latter by whether siblings are equally subject to the environmental characteristic in question. Using monozygotic twin fixed effects models, which compare outcomes among genetically identical pairs, we show that many characteristics of objectively shared environments significantly moderate the effects of nonshared environments on adolescent academic achievement and verbal intelligence, violating the additivity assumption of behavioral genetic methods. Importantly, these effects would be categorized as nonshared environmental influences in standard twin models despite their roots in shared environments. These findings should encourage caution among those who claim that the frequently trivial variance attributed to shared environments in behavioral genetic models means that families, schools, and neighborhoods do not meaningfully influence these outcomes.

AB - Prominent authors in the behavioral genetics tradition have long argued that shared environments do not meaningfully shape intelligence and academic achievement. However, we argue that these conclusions are erroneous due to large violations of the additivity assumption underlying behavioral genetics methods - that sources of genetic and shared and nonshared environmental variance are independent and non-interactive. This is compounded in some cases by the theoretical equation of the effective and objective environments, where the former is defined by whether siblings are made more or less similar, and the latter by whether siblings are equally subject to the environmental characteristic in question. Using monozygotic twin fixed effects models, which compare outcomes among genetically identical pairs, we show that many characteristics of objectively shared environments significantly moderate the effects of nonshared environments on adolescent academic achievement and verbal intelligence, violating the additivity assumption of behavioral genetic methods. Importantly, these effects would be categorized as nonshared environmental influences in standard twin models despite their roots in shared environments. These findings should encourage caution among those who claim that the frequently trivial variance attributed to shared environments in behavioral genetic models means that families, schools, and neighborhoods do not meaningfully influence these outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926329732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926329732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.02.011

DO - 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.02.011

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 422

EP - 439

JO - Social Science Research

JF - Social Science Research

SN - 0049-089X

ER -