Nutrient management planners' feedback on New York and Pennsylvania phosphorus indices

S. Cela, Q. M. Ketterings, K. J. Czymmek, Jennifer Weld, Douglas Brian Beegle, Peter J A Kleinman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

State phosphorus indices (PIs) are being evaluated across the United States due to variability in phosphorus (P) management recommendations and questions about the lack of water quality improvement in some watersheds. Nutrient management planners in New York (NY) and Pennsylvania (PA) were surveyed via two separate but related questionnaires to document perspectives on the current NY-PI and PA-PI and to obtain recommendations for improvements. Many planners were content with the current versions of the PIs but felt improvements could be made to more strongly discourage application of manure under conditions of high P loss potential and better promote certain best management practices. The NY planners felt that the NY-PI should discourage manure application during winter and to fields near streams, and should more strongly promote manure incorporation or injection, establishment of cover crops, ground coverage with crop residues, and implementation of setbacks and vegetated buffers. Similarly, the PA planners felt that the PA-PI should more strongly discourage manure application to fields with insufficient ground cover, near subsurface drainage and surface inlets, and during winter. In addition, the PA planners said the PA-PI should more strongly encourage soil conservation practices such as no-till, use of cover crops, and vegetated buffers. Results of the survey suggest common experiences and viewpoints among planners in NY and PA, resulting in a valuable on-the-ground assessment of the PIs as a nutrient management planning tool in both states, and the potential for development of a single, physiographic region PI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)281-288
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Soil and Water Conservation
Volume71
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

nutrient management
phosphorus
nutrient
manure
cover crop
cover crops
buffers
index
subsurface drainage
conservation practices
winter
best management practices
ground cover
best management practice
crop residue
soil conservation
crop residues
vegetation cover
no-tillage
questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Soil Science
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Cela, S. ; Ketterings, Q. M. ; Czymmek, K. J. ; Weld, Jennifer ; Beegle, Douglas Brian ; Kleinman, Peter J A. / Nutrient management planners' feedback on New York and Pennsylvania phosphorus indices. In: Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 2016 ; Vol. 71, No. 4. pp. 281-288.
@article{48965ea4ec064556825b4eef6790e1bc,
title = "Nutrient management planners' feedback on New York and Pennsylvania phosphorus indices",
abstract = "State phosphorus indices (PIs) are being evaluated across the United States due to variability in phosphorus (P) management recommendations and questions about the lack of water quality improvement in some watersheds. Nutrient management planners in New York (NY) and Pennsylvania (PA) were surveyed via two separate but related questionnaires to document perspectives on the current NY-PI and PA-PI and to obtain recommendations for improvements. Many planners were content with the current versions of the PIs but felt improvements could be made to more strongly discourage application of manure under conditions of high P loss potential and better promote certain best management practices. The NY planners felt that the NY-PI should discourage manure application during winter and to fields near streams, and should more strongly promote manure incorporation or injection, establishment of cover crops, ground coverage with crop residues, and implementation of setbacks and vegetated buffers. Similarly, the PA planners felt that the PA-PI should more strongly discourage manure application to fields with insufficient ground cover, near subsurface drainage and surface inlets, and during winter. In addition, the PA planners said the PA-PI should more strongly encourage soil conservation practices such as no-till, use of cover crops, and vegetated buffers. Results of the survey suggest common experiences and viewpoints among planners in NY and PA, resulting in a valuable on-the-ground assessment of the PIs as a nutrient management planning tool in both states, and the potential for development of a single, physiographic region PI.",
author = "S. Cela and Ketterings, {Q. M.} and Czymmek, {K. J.} and Jennifer Weld and Beegle, {Douglas Brian} and Kleinman, {Peter J A}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2489/jswc.71.4.281",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "281--288",
journal = "Journal of Soils and Water Conservation",
issn = "0022-4561",
publisher = "Soil Conservation Society of America",
number = "4",

}

Nutrient management planners' feedback on New York and Pennsylvania phosphorus indices. / Cela, S.; Ketterings, Q. M.; Czymmek, K. J.; Weld, Jennifer; Beegle, Douglas Brian; Kleinman, Peter J A.

In: Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 71, No. 4, 01.07.2016, p. 281-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nutrient management planners' feedback on New York and Pennsylvania phosphorus indices

AU - Cela, S.

AU - Ketterings, Q. M.

AU - Czymmek, K. J.

AU - Weld, Jennifer

AU - Beegle, Douglas Brian

AU - Kleinman, Peter J A

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - State phosphorus indices (PIs) are being evaluated across the United States due to variability in phosphorus (P) management recommendations and questions about the lack of water quality improvement in some watersheds. Nutrient management planners in New York (NY) and Pennsylvania (PA) were surveyed via two separate but related questionnaires to document perspectives on the current NY-PI and PA-PI and to obtain recommendations for improvements. Many planners were content with the current versions of the PIs but felt improvements could be made to more strongly discourage application of manure under conditions of high P loss potential and better promote certain best management practices. The NY planners felt that the NY-PI should discourage manure application during winter and to fields near streams, and should more strongly promote manure incorporation or injection, establishment of cover crops, ground coverage with crop residues, and implementation of setbacks and vegetated buffers. Similarly, the PA planners felt that the PA-PI should more strongly discourage manure application to fields with insufficient ground cover, near subsurface drainage and surface inlets, and during winter. In addition, the PA planners said the PA-PI should more strongly encourage soil conservation practices such as no-till, use of cover crops, and vegetated buffers. Results of the survey suggest common experiences and viewpoints among planners in NY and PA, resulting in a valuable on-the-ground assessment of the PIs as a nutrient management planning tool in both states, and the potential for development of a single, physiographic region PI.

AB - State phosphorus indices (PIs) are being evaluated across the United States due to variability in phosphorus (P) management recommendations and questions about the lack of water quality improvement in some watersheds. Nutrient management planners in New York (NY) and Pennsylvania (PA) were surveyed via two separate but related questionnaires to document perspectives on the current NY-PI and PA-PI and to obtain recommendations for improvements. Many planners were content with the current versions of the PIs but felt improvements could be made to more strongly discourage application of manure under conditions of high P loss potential and better promote certain best management practices. The NY planners felt that the NY-PI should discourage manure application during winter and to fields near streams, and should more strongly promote manure incorporation or injection, establishment of cover crops, ground coverage with crop residues, and implementation of setbacks and vegetated buffers. Similarly, the PA planners felt that the PA-PI should more strongly discourage manure application to fields with insufficient ground cover, near subsurface drainage and surface inlets, and during winter. In addition, the PA planners said the PA-PI should more strongly encourage soil conservation practices such as no-till, use of cover crops, and vegetated buffers. Results of the survey suggest common experiences and viewpoints among planners in NY and PA, resulting in a valuable on-the-ground assessment of the PIs as a nutrient management planning tool in both states, and the potential for development of a single, physiographic region PI.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978971210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978971210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2489/jswc.71.4.281

DO - 10.2489/jswc.71.4.281

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84978971210

VL - 71

SP - 281

EP - 288

JO - Journal of Soils and Water Conservation

JF - Journal of Soils and Water Conservation

SN - 0022-4561

IS - 4

ER -