Occurrence of pod rot pathogens in peanuts grown in North Carolina

J. E. Hollowell, B. B. Shew, M. K. Beute, Z. G. Abad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pod rot diseases historically caused significant losses in peanut production in North Carolina. Advances in the understanding of pod rot diseases and changes in cultural practices minimized losses in the years since 1979. By the early 1990s, however, some peanut growers began to observe pod rot that apparently was not associated with infection by common soilborne pathogens. Incidence of pod rot also was high in research plots used to study conservation tillage methods. Selected farms were surveyed in the fall of 1994, 1995, and 1996 to identify the fungi associated with pod rot symptoms in North Carolina. Over the three years of the study, more than 6,000 symptomatic pods from 125 peanut fields were assayed for Rhizoctonia spp., Pythium spp., Cylindrocladium parasiticum, Sclerotium rolfsii, and Sclerotinia minor. All five pathogens were isolated during the field survey, with Pythium spp. and Rhizoctonia spp. isolated most frequently. Rhizoctonia spp. were the dominant pathogen in the majority of fields in 1994, whereas Pythium spp. predominated in 1995 and 1996. Combinations of pathogens were identified from 12 to 15% of pods; Rhizoctonia spp. + Pythium spp. and Pythium spp. + C. parasiticum were the most frequent combinations. The mean estimated incidence of pod rot was 6.6% in 1995 and 5.9% in 1996. The effects of cover crops and tillage on pod rot incidence were studied in microplots in 1995 and 1996. In 1995, winter cover crops (wheat, oat, rye, and fallow soil) did not affect pod rot incidence, but incidence was greater in no-till treatments compared to plots with conventional tillage. Pod rot incidence did not differ among infestation treatments and no interactions among pathogen, cover crop, or tillage treatments were significant. In contrast, significant (P = 0.04) interactions among winter cover crops and tillage occurred in 1996. Tillage did not affect pod rot incidence following wheat or oats, but incidence following rye was much greater in no-till than in tilled plots.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1345-1349
Number of pages5
JournalPlant disease
Volume82
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1998

Fingerprint

peanuts
pods
pathogens
Pythium
incidence
Rhizoctonia
cover crops
tillage
rye
no-tillage
oats
Cylindrocladium
Sclerotinia minor
Athelia rolfsii
wheat
winter
conservation tillage
plant cultural practices
conventional tillage
fallow

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Hollowell, J. E., Shew, B. B., Beute, M. K., & Abad, Z. G. (1998). Occurrence of pod rot pathogens in peanuts grown in North Carolina. Plant disease, 82(12), 1345-1349. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.12.1345
Hollowell, J. E. ; Shew, B. B. ; Beute, M. K. ; Abad, Z. G. / Occurrence of pod rot pathogens in peanuts grown in North Carolina. In: Plant disease. 1998 ; Vol. 82, No. 12. pp. 1345-1349.
@article{554e01dbc523499da3d6d8b992280469,
title = "Occurrence of pod rot pathogens in peanuts grown in North Carolina",
abstract = "Pod rot diseases historically caused significant losses in peanut production in North Carolina. Advances in the understanding of pod rot diseases and changes in cultural practices minimized losses in the years since 1979. By the early 1990s, however, some peanut growers began to observe pod rot that apparently was not associated with infection by common soilborne pathogens. Incidence of pod rot also was high in research plots used to study conservation tillage methods. Selected farms were surveyed in the fall of 1994, 1995, and 1996 to identify the fungi associated with pod rot symptoms in North Carolina. Over the three years of the study, more than 6,000 symptomatic pods from 125 peanut fields were assayed for Rhizoctonia spp., Pythium spp., Cylindrocladium parasiticum, Sclerotium rolfsii, and Sclerotinia minor. All five pathogens were isolated during the field survey, with Pythium spp. and Rhizoctonia spp. isolated most frequently. Rhizoctonia spp. were the dominant pathogen in the majority of fields in 1994, whereas Pythium spp. predominated in 1995 and 1996. Combinations of pathogens were identified from 12 to 15{\%} of pods; Rhizoctonia spp. + Pythium spp. and Pythium spp. + C. parasiticum were the most frequent combinations. The mean estimated incidence of pod rot was 6.6{\%} in 1995 and 5.9{\%} in 1996. The effects of cover crops and tillage on pod rot incidence were studied in microplots in 1995 and 1996. In 1995, winter cover crops (wheat, oat, rye, and fallow soil) did not affect pod rot incidence, but incidence was greater in no-till treatments compared to plots with conventional tillage. Pod rot incidence did not differ among infestation treatments and no interactions among pathogen, cover crop, or tillage treatments were significant. In contrast, significant (P = 0.04) interactions among winter cover crops and tillage occurred in 1996. Tillage did not affect pod rot incidence following wheat or oats, but incidence following rye was much greater in no-till than in tilled plots.",
author = "Hollowell, {J. E.} and Shew, {B. B.} and Beute, {M. K.} and Abad, {Z. G.}",
year = "1998",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.12.1345",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "1345--1349",
journal = "Plant Disease",
issn = "0191-2917",
publisher = "American Phytopathological Society",
number = "12",

}

Hollowell, JE, Shew, BB, Beute, MK & Abad, ZG 1998, 'Occurrence of pod rot pathogens in peanuts grown in North Carolina', Plant disease, vol. 82, no. 12, pp. 1345-1349. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.12.1345

Occurrence of pod rot pathogens in peanuts grown in North Carolina. / Hollowell, J. E.; Shew, B. B.; Beute, M. K.; Abad, Z. G.

In: Plant disease, Vol. 82, No. 12, 12.1998, p. 1345-1349.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Occurrence of pod rot pathogens in peanuts grown in North Carolina

AU - Hollowell, J. E.

AU - Shew, B. B.

AU - Beute, M. K.

AU - Abad, Z. G.

PY - 1998/12

Y1 - 1998/12

N2 - Pod rot diseases historically caused significant losses in peanut production in North Carolina. Advances in the understanding of pod rot diseases and changes in cultural practices minimized losses in the years since 1979. By the early 1990s, however, some peanut growers began to observe pod rot that apparently was not associated with infection by common soilborne pathogens. Incidence of pod rot also was high in research plots used to study conservation tillage methods. Selected farms were surveyed in the fall of 1994, 1995, and 1996 to identify the fungi associated with pod rot symptoms in North Carolina. Over the three years of the study, more than 6,000 symptomatic pods from 125 peanut fields were assayed for Rhizoctonia spp., Pythium spp., Cylindrocladium parasiticum, Sclerotium rolfsii, and Sclerotinia minor. All five pathogens were isolated during the field survey, with Pythium spp. and Rhizoctonia spp. isolated most frequently. Rhizoctonia spp. were the dominant pathogen in the majority of fields in 1994, whereas Pythium spp. predominated in 1995 and 1996. Combinations of pathogens were identified from 12 to 15% of pods; Rhizoctonia spp. + Pythium spp. and Pythium spp. + C. parasiticum were the most frequent combinations. The mean estimated incidence of pod rot was 6.6% in 1995 and 5.9% in 1996. The effects of cover crops and tillage on pod rot incidence were studied in microplots in 1995 and 1996. In 1995, winter cover crops (wheat, oat, rye, and fallow soil) did not affect pod rot incidence, but incidence was greater in no-till treatments compared to plots with conventional tillage. Pod rot incidence did not differ among infestation treatments and no interactions among pathogen, cover crop, or tillage treatments were significant. In contrast, significant (P = 0.04) interactions among winter cover crops and tillage occurred in 1996. Tillage did not affect pod rot incidence following wheat or oats, but incidence following rye was much greater in no-till than in tilled plots.

AB - Pod rot diseases historically caused significant losses in peanut production in North Carolina. Advances in the understanding of pod rot diseases and changes in cultural practices minimized losses in the years since 1979. By the early 1990s, however, some peanut growers began to observe pod rot that apparently was not associated with infection by common soilborne pathogens. Incidence of pod rot also was high in research plots used to study conservation tillage methods. Selected farms were surveyed in the fall of 1994, 1995, and 1996 to identify the fungi associated with pod rot symptoms in North Carolina. Over the three years of the study, more than 6,000 symptomatic pods from 125 peanut fields were assayed for Rhizoctonia spp., Pythium spp., Cylindrocladium parasiticum, Sclerotium rolfsii, and Sclerotinia minor. All five pathogens were isolated during the field survey, with Pythium spp. and Rhizoctonia spp. isolated most frequently. Rhizoctonia spp. were the dominant pathogen in the majority of fields in 1994, whereas Pythium spp. predominated in 1995 and 1996. Combinations of pathogens were identified from 12 to 15% of pods; Rhizoctonia spp. + Pythium spp. and Pythium spp. + C. parasiticum were the most frequent combinations. The mean estimated incidence of pod rot was 6.6% in 1995 and 5.9% in 1996. The effects of cover crops and tillage on pod rot incidence were studied in microplots in 1995 and 1996. In 1995, winter cover crops (wheat, oat, rye, and fallow soil) did not affect pod rot incidence, but incidence was greater in no-till treatments compared to plots with conventional tillage. Pod rot incidence did not differ among infestation treatments and no interactions among pathogen, cover crop, or tillage treatments were significant. In contrast, significant (P = 0.04) interactions among winter cover crops and tillage occurred in 1996. Tillage did not affect pod rot incidence following wheat or oats, but incidence following rye was much greater in no-till than in tilled plots.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031786282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031786282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.12.1345

DO - 10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.12.1345

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031786282

VL - 82

SP - 1345

EP - 1349

JO - Plant Disease

JF - Plant Disease

SN - 0191-2917

IS - 12

ER -