On fair attribution of costs under peak-based pricing to cloud tenants

Neda Nasiriani, Cheng Wang, George Kesidis, Bhuvan Urgaonkar, Lydia Y. Chen, Robert Birke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The costs incurred by cloud providers towards operating their data centers are often determined in large part by their peak demands. The pricing schemes currently used by cloud providers to recoup these costs from their tenants, however, do not distinguish tenants based on their contributions to the cloud's overall peak demand. Using the concrete example of peak-based pricing as employed by many electric utility companies, we show that this “gap” may lead to unfair attribution of costs to the tenants. Simple enhancements of existing cloud pricing (e.g., analogous to the coincident peak pricing (CPP) used by some electric utilities) do not adequately address these shortcomings and suffer from short-term unfairness and undesirable oscillatory price-vs.demand relationships offered to tenants. To overcome these shortcomings, we define an alternative pricing scheme to more fairly distribute a cloud's costs among its tenants. We demonstrate the efficacy of our scheme under price-sensitive tenant demand response using a combination of (i) extensive empirical evaluation with recent workloads from commercial data centers operated by IBM and (ii) analytical [modeling] through non-cooperative game theory for a special case of tenant demand model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number3
JournalACM Transactions on Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Computing Systems
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2016

Fingerprint

Costs
Electric utilities
Game theory
Industry

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Science (miscellaneous)
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Information Systems
  • Software
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Media Technology

Cite this

@article{d3ec21c029724062a2c7fad782b7e38c,
title = "On fair attribution of costs under peak-based pricing to cloud tenants",
abstract = "The costs incurred by cloud providers towards operating their data centers are often determined in large part by their peak demands. The pricing schemes currently used by cloud providers to recoup these costs from their tenants, however, do not distinguish tenants based on their contributions to the cloud's overall peak demand. Using the concrete example of peak-based pricing as employed by many electric utility companies, we show that this “gap” may lead to unfair attribution of costs to the tenants. Simple enhancements of existing cloud pricing (e.g., analogous to the coincident peak pricing (CPP) used by some electric utilities) do not adequately address these shortcomings and suffer from short-term unfairness and undesirable oscillatory price-vs.demand relationships offered to tenants. To overcome these shortcomings, we define an alternative pricing scheme to more fairly distribute a cloud's costs among its tenants. We demonstrate the efficacy of our scheme under price-sensitive tenant demand response using a combination of (i) extensive empirical evaluation with recent workloads from commercial data centers operated by IBM and (ii) analytical [modeling] through non-cooperative game theory for a special case of tenant demand model.",
author = "Neda Nasiriani and Cheng Wang and George Kesidis and Bhuvan Urgaonkar and Chen, {Lydia Y.} and Robert Birke",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1145/2970815",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
journal = "ACM Transactions on Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Computing Systems",
issn = "2376-3639",
number = "1",

}

On fair attribution of costs under peak-based pricing to cloud tenants. / Nasiriani, Neda; Wang, Cheng; Kesidis, George; Urgaonkar, Bhuvan; Chen, Lydia Y.; Birke, Robert.

In: ACM Transactions on Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Computing Systems, Vol. 2, No. 1, 3, 11.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On fair attribution of costs under peak-based pricing to cloud tenants

AU - Nasiriani, Neda

AU - Wang, Cheng

AU - Kesidis, George

AU - Urgaonkar, Bhuvan

AU - Chen, Lydia Y.

AU - Birke, Robert

PY - 2016/11

Y1 - 2016/11

N2 - The costs incurred by cloud providers towards operating their data centers are often determined in large part by their peak demands. The pricing schemes currently used by cloud providers to recoup these costs from their tenants, however, do not distinguish tenants based on their contributions to the cloud's overall peak demand. Using the concrete example of peak-based pricing as employed by many electric utility companies, we show that this “gap” may lead to unfair attribution of costs to the tenants. Simple enhancements of existing cloud pricing (e.g., analogous to the coincident peak pricing (CPP) used by some electric utilities) do not adequately address these shortcomings and suffer from short-term unfairness and undesirable oscillatory price-vs.demand relationships offered to tenants. To overcome these shortcomings, we define an alternative pricing scheme to more fairly distribute a cloud's costs among its tenants. We demonstrate the efficacy of our scheme under price-sensitive tenant demand response using a combination of (i) extensive empirical evaluation with recent workloads from commercial data centers operated by IBM and (ii) analytical [modeling] through non-cooperative game theory for a special case of tenant demand model.

AB - The costs incurred by cloud providers towards operating their data centers are often determined in large part by their peak demands. The pricing schemes currently used by cloud providers to recoup these costs from their tenants, however, do not distinguish tenants based on their contributions to the cloud's overall peak demand. Using the concrete example of peak-based pricing as employed by many electric utility companies, we show that this “gap” may lead to unfair attribution of costs to the tenants. Simple enhancements of existing cloud pricing (e.g., analogous to the coincident peak pricing (CPP) used by some electric utilities) do not adequately address these shortcomings and suffer from short-term unfairness and undesirable oscillatory price-vs.demand relationships offered to tenants. To overcome these shortcomings, we define an alternative pricing scheme to more fairly distribute a cloud's costs among its tenants. We demonstrate the efficacy of our scheme under price-sensitive tenant demand response using a combination of (i) extensive empirical evaluation with recent workloads from commercial data centers operated by IBM and (ii) analytical [modeling] through non-cooperative game theory for a special case of tenant demand model.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040514329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040514329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/2970815

DO - 10.1145/2970815

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85040514329

VL - 2

JO - ACM Transactions on Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Computing Systems

JF - ACM Transactions on Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Computing Systems

SN - 2376-3639

IS - 1

M1 - 3

ER -