On the inaccuracy of breath-by-breath metabolic gas exchange systems

Andrew Huszczuk, Philippe Haouzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This technical note is presenting and discussing a severe limitation of the breath-by-breath (BBB) determination of pulmonary gas exchange routinely used as a surrogate for the metabolic gas exchange rate at rest and during exercise. We are presenting the view that continuous airway gas sampling at the mouth used for the determination of O2 and CO2 content is inaccurate in the range of a low-to-medium expiratory flows, due to the discrepancy between the cross section surfaces of the sampling line and the expiratory tube (mask or mouth piece). This difference results in the sampling of a mixed exhaled gas at low expiratory flow, for which any temporal relationship between the instantaneous expired CO2 and O2 signals and instantaneous expiratory flow is lost. Further analysis of this mechanism points to the difference between the exhalation (ve) and sampling (vs) gas velocities, where the ratio of ve/vs must be equal or higher than 1 to enable proper analysis of the respiratory gas concentrations during exhalation. Moreover, the above requirement is particularly crucial in monitoring the tidal concentration of the respiratory gases in experiments with small animals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14-16
Number of pages3
JournalRespiratory Physiology and Neurobiology
Volume233
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Gases
Exhalation
Mouth
Pulmonary Gas Exchange
Masks

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Physiology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

@article{b431c1bf52e04deea040c37b76f4fc13,
title = "On the inaccuracy of breath-by-breath metabolic gas exchange systems",
abstract = "This technical note is presenting and discussing a severe limitation of the breath-by-breath (BBB) determination of pulmonary gas exchange routinely used as a surrogate for the metabolic gas exchange rate at rest and during exercise. We are presenting the view that continuous airway gas sampling at the mouth used for the determination of O2 and CO2 content is inaccurate in the range of a low-to-medium expiratory flows, due to the discrepancy between the cross section surfaces of the sampling line and the expiratory tube (mask or mouth piece). This difference results in the sampling of a mixed exhaled gas at low expiratory flow, for which any temporal relationship between the instantaneous expired CO2 and O2 signals and instantaneous expiratory flow is lost. Further analysis of this mechanism points to the difference between the exhalation (ve) and sampling (vs) gas velocities, where the ratio of ve/vs must be equal or higher than 1 to enable proper analysis of the respiratory gas concentrations during exhalation. Moreover, the above requirement is particularly crucial in monitoring the tidal concentration of the respiratory gases in experiments with small animals.",
author = "Andrew Huszczuk and Philippe Haouzi",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.resp.2016.07.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "233",
pages = "14--16",
journal = "Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology",
issn = "1569-9048",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

On the inaccuracy of breath-by-breath metabolic gas exchange systems. / Huszczuk, Andrew; Haouzi, Philippe.

In: Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology, Vol. 233, 01.11.2016, p. 14-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the inaccuracy of breath-by-breath metabolic gas exchange systems

AU - Huszczuk, Andrew

AU - Haouzi, Philippe

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - This technical note is presenting and discussing a severe limitation of the breath-by-breath (BBB) determination of pulmonary gas exchange routinely used as a surrogate for the metabolic gas exchange rate at rest and during exercise. We are presenting the view that continuous airway gas sampling at the mouth used for the determination of O2 and CO2 content is inaccurate in the range of a low-to-medium expiratory flows, due to the discrepancy between the cross section surfaces of the sampling line and the expiratory tube (mask or mouth piece). This difference results in the sampling of a mixed exhaled gas at low expiratory flow, for which any temporal relationship between the instantaneous expired CO2 and O2 signals and instantaneous expiratory flow is lost. Further analysis of this mechanism points to the difference between the exhalation (ve) and sampling (vs) gas velocities, where the ratio of ve/vs must be equal or higher than 1 to enable proper analysis of the respiratory gas concentrations during exhalation. Moreover, the above requirement is particularly crucial in monitoring the tidal concentration of the respiratory gases in experiments with small animals.

AB - This technical note is presenting and discussing a severe limitation of the breath-by-breath (BBB) determination of pulmonary gas exchange routinely used as a surrogate for the metabolic gas exchange rate at rest and during exercise. We are presenting the view that continuous airway gas sampling at the mouth used for the determination of O2 and CO2 content is inaccurate in the range of a low-to-medium expiratory flows, due to the discrepancy between the cross section surfaces of the sampling line and the expiratory tube (mask or mouth piece). This difference results in the sampling of a mixed exhaled gas at low expiratory flow, for which any temporal relationship between the instantaneous expired CO2 and O2 signals and instantaneous expiratory flow is lost. Further analysis of this mechanism points to the difference between the exhalation (ve) and sampling (vs) gas velocities, where the ratio of ve/vs must be equal or higher than 1 to enable proper analysis of the respiratory gas concentrations during exhalation. Moreover, the above requirement is particularly crucial in monitoring the tidal concentration of the respiratory gases in experiments with small animals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979946078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979946078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.resp.2016.07.007

DO - 10.1016/j.resp.2016.07.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 27476004

AN - SCOPUS:84979946078

VL - 233

SP - 14

EP - 16

JO - Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology

JF - Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology

SN - 1569-9048

ER -