TY - JOUR
T1 - On the relevance of turbulent structures resolution for cross-flow in a helical-coil tube bundle
AU - Feng, Jinyong
AU - Acton, Michael
AU - Baglietto, Emilio
AU - Kraus, Adam R.
AU - Merzari, Elia
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded under the auspices of the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation ( NEAMS ) program of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy. We also appreciate the support from the Argonne Leadership Computing Facility ( ALCF ) at Argonne National Laboratory which makes the reference LES simulation possible. Appendix A
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/6/1
Y1 - 2020/6/1
N2 - Helical-coil steam generators are being adopted in a number of advanced nuclear reactor designs because of their increased heat transfer efficiency and compactness. Due to the limited operational experience and the expected high cost of dedicated experiments, it is imperative to demonstrate the modeling capability. Computational fluid dynamics is ideally suited for this problem, due to its high resolution and accuracy. However, traditional low-cost URANS turbulence models have shown limited applicability for cross-flow in helical tube bundles. On the other hand, LES methods provide high-accuracy and high-fidelity data with prohibitively high computational cost for design use. In this work, the recently proposed hybrid second-generation model STRUCT is compared to classic URANS turbulence formulations against high-fidelity LES simulations. The STRUCT model produces accurate predictions for all relevant quantities, demonstrating high potential for reproducing helical-coil tube bundle flow phenomena accurately, at an affordable computational cost.
AB - Helical-coil steam generators are being adopted in a number of advanced nuclear reactor designs because of their increased heat transfer efficiency and compactness. Due to the limited operational experience and the expected high cost of dedicated experiments, it is imperative to demonstrate the modeling capability. Computational fluid dynamics is ideally suited for this problem, due to its high resolution and accuracy. However, traditional low-cost URANS turbulence models have shown limited applicability for cross-flow in helical tube bundles. On the other hand, LES methods provide high-accuracy and high-fidelity data with prohibitively high computational cost for design use. In this work, the recently proposed hybrid second-generation model STRUCT is compared to classic URANS turbulence formulations against high-fidelity LES simulations. The STRUCT model produces accurate predictions for all relevant quantities, demonstrating high potential for reproducing helical-coil tube bundle flow phenomena accurately, at an affordable computational cost.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077513775&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077513775&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.anucene.2019.107298
DO - 10.1016/j.anucene.2019.107298
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85077513775
SN - 0306-4549
VL - 140
JO - Annals of Nuclear Energy
JF - Annals of Nuclear Energy
M1 - 107298
ER -