On the selection of localization radius in ensemble filtering for multiscale quasigeostrophic dynamics

Yue Ying, Fuqing Zhang, Jeffrey L. Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Covariance localization remedies sampling errors due to limited ensemble size in ensemble data assimilation. Previous studies suggest that the optimal localization radius depends on ensemble size, observation density and accuracy, as well as the correlation length scale determined by model dynamics. A comprehensive localization theory for multiscale dynamical systems with varying observation density remains an active area of research. Using a two-layer quasigeostrophic (QG) model, this study systematically evaluates the sensitivity of the best Gaspari-Cohn localization radius to changes in model resolution, ensemble size, and observing networks. Numerical experiment results show that the best localization radius is smaller for smaller-scale components of a QG flow, indicating its scale dependency. The best localization radius is rather insensitive to changes in model resolution, as long as the key dynamical processes are reasonably well represented by the low-resolution model with inflation methods that account for representation errors. As ensemble size decreases, the best localization radius shifts to smaller values. However, for nonlocal correlations between an observation and state variables that peak at a certain distance, decreasing localization radii further within this distance does not reduce analysis errors. Increasing the density of an observing network has two effects that both reduce the best localization radius. First, the reduced observation error spectral variance further constrains prior ensembles at large scales. Less large-scale contribution results in a shorter overall correlation length, which favors a smaller localization radius. Second, a denser network provides more independent pieces of information, thus a smaller localization radius still allows the same number of observations to constrain each state variable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)543-560
Number of pages18
JournalMonthly Weather Review
Volume146
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

error analysis
inflation
data assimilation
sampling
experiment
method
effect

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Ying, Yue ; Zhang, Fuqing ; Anderson, Jeffrey L. / On the selection of localization radius in ensemble filtering for multiscale quasigeostrophic dynamics. In: Monthly Weather Review. 2018 ; Vol. 146, No. 2. pp. 543-560.
@article{dfdbed2872c5430d9a1906d10740f357,
title = "On the selection of localization radius in ensemble filtering for multiscale quasigeostrophic dynamics",
abstract = "Covariance localization remedies sampling errors due to limited ensemble size in ensemble data assimilation. Previous studies suggest that the optimal localization radius depends on ensemble size, observation density and accuracy, as well as the correlation length scale determined by model dynamics. A comprehensive localization theory for multiscale dynamical systems with varying observation density remains an active area of research. Using a two-layer quasigeostrophic (QG) model, this study systematically evaluates the sensitivity of the best Gaspari-Cohn localization radius to changes in model resolution, ensemble size, and observing networks. Numerical experiment results show that the best localization radius is smaller for smaller-scale components of a QG flow, indicating its scale dependency. The best localization radius is rather insensitive to changes in model resolution, as long as the key dynamical processes are reasonably well represented by the low-resolution model with inflation methods that account for representation errors. As ensemble size decreases, the best localization radius shifts to smaller values. However, for nonlocal correlations between an observation and state variables that peak at a certain distance, decreasing localization radii further within this distance does not reduce analysis errors. Increasing the density of an observing network has two effects that both reduce the best localization radius. First, the reduced observation error spectral variance further constrains prior ensembles at large scales. Less large-scale contribution results in a shorter overall correlation length, which favors a smaller localization radius. Second, a denser network provides more independent pieces of information, thus a smaller localization radius still allows the same number of observations to constrain each state variable.",
author = "Yue Ying and Fuqing Zhang and Anderson, {Jeffrey L.}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1175/MWR-D-17-0336.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "146",
pages = "543--560",
journal = "Monthly Weather Review",
issn = "0027-0644",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "2",

}

On the selection of localization radius in ensemble filtering for multiscale quasigeostrophic dynamics. / Ying, Yue; Zhang, Fuqing; Anderson, Jeffrey L.

In: Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 146, No. 2, 01.02.2018, p. 543-560.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the selection of localization radius in ensemble filtering for multiscale quasigeostrophic dynamics

AU - Ying, Yue

AU - Zhang, Fuqing

AU - Anderson, Jeffrey L.

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Covariance localization remedies sampling errors due to limited ensemble size in ensemble data assimilation. Previous studies suggest that the optimal localization radius depends on ensemble size, observation density and accuracy, as well as the correlation length scale determined by model dynamics. A comprehensive localization theory for multiscale dynamical systems with varying observation density remains an active area of research. Using a two-layer quasigeostrophic (QG) model, this study systematically evaluates the sensitivity of the best Gaspari-Cohn localization radius to changes in model resolution, ensemble size, and observing networks. Numerical experiment results show that the best localization radius is smaller for smaller-scale components of a QG flow, indicating its scale dependency. The best localization radius is rather insensitive to changes in model resolution, as long as the key dynamical processes are reasonably well represented by the low-resolution model with inflation methods that account for representation errors. As ensemble size decreases, the best localization radius shifts to smaller values. However, for nonlocal correlations between an observation and state variables that peak at a certain distance, decreasing localization radii further within this distance does not reduce analysis errors. Increasing the density of an observing network has two effects that both reduce the best localization radius. First, the reduced observation error spectral variance further constrains prior ensembles at large scales. Less large-scale contribution results in a shorter overall correlation length, which favors a smaller localization radius. Second, a denser network provides more independent pieces of information, thus a smaller localization radius still allows the same number of observations to constrain each state variable.

AB - Covariance localization remedies sampling errors due to limited ensemble size in ensemble data assimilation. Previous studies suggest that the optimal localization radius depends on ensemble size, observation density and accuracy, as well as the correlation length scale determined by model dynamics. A comprehensive localization theory for multiscale dynamical systems with varying observation density remains an active area of research. Using a two-layer quasigeostrophic (QG) model, this study systematically evaluates the sensitivity of the best Gaspari-Cohn localization radius to changes in model resolution, ensemble size, and observing networks. Numerical experiment results show that the best localization radius is smaller for smaller-scale components of a QG flow, indicating its scale dependency. The best localization radius is rather insensitive to changes in model resolution, as long as the key dynamical processes are reasonably well represented by the low-resolution model with inflation methods that account for representation errors. As ensemble size decreases, the best localization radius shifts to smaller values. However, for nonlocal correlations between an observation and state variables that peak at a certain distance, decreasing localization radii further within this distance does not reduce analysis errors. Increasing the density of an observing network has two effects that both reduce the best localization radius. First, the reduced observation error spectral variance further constrains prior ensembles at large scales. Less large-scale contribution results in a shorter overall correlation length, which favors a smaller localization radius. Second, a denser network provides more independent pieces of information, thus a smaller localization radius still allows the same number of observations to constrain each state variable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042404055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042404055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/MWR-D-17-0336.1

DO - 10.1175/MWR-D-17-0336.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042404055

VL - 146

SP - 543

EP - 560

JO - Monthly Weather Review

JF - Monthly Weather Review

SN - 0027-0644

IS - 2

ER -