On the structural and reactivity differences between biomass- and coal-derived chars

Fernando Vallejos-Burgos, Nicolás Díaz-Pérez, Álvaro Silva-Villalobos, Romel Jiménez, Ximena García, Ljubisa R. Radovic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rapidly growing research on biomass reactivity has not benefited enough from the very abundant knowledge acquired on coal-derived materials. Literature comparisons using similar methods are scant and inconclusive. To clarify differences (or similarities) between coal- and biomass-derived chars, we performed a systematic study using three different carbon-based solids at different stages of coalification. Two biomass materials and a low-rank coal were demineralized and heat-treated between 550 and 1450 °C. Even after heat treatment, biomass-derived chars remained less structurally ordered, more microporous, and more reactive towards oxygen than their coal-derived counterparts. Through computational chemistry, we compared the thermodynamic driving forces and kinetic barriers for biomass-like and coal-like representative graphene clusters. The oxidation pathway to CO was the same for both clusters, but different for CO2 formation. We predict that the energy barrier of CO desorption is higher for coal-derived chars, whereas that of CO2 desorption is higher for biomass-derived chars; this is consistent with the dominant formation of CO2 at the relatively low reaction temperatures used in our study. We demonstrate also that in a kinetically controlled reaction regime, in the absence of catalytically active minerals, the reactivity differences can be explained on the basis of differences in char surface chemistry.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)253-263
Number of pages11
JournalCarbon
Volume109
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Coal
Biomass
Carbon Monoxide
Desorption
Computational chemistry
Graphite
Energy barriers
Surface chemistry
Graphene
Minerals
Carbon
Heat treatment
Thermodynamics
Oxygen
Oxidation
Kinetics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Materials Science(all)

Cite this

Vallejos-Burgos, F., Díaz-Pérez, N., Silva-Villalobos, Á., Jiménez, R., García, X., & Radovic, L. R. (2016). On the structural and reactivity differences between biomass- and coal-derived chars. Carbon, 109, 253-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.012
Vallejos-Burgos, Fernando ; Díaz-Pérez, Nicolás ; Silva-Villalobos, Álvaro ; Jiménez, Romel ; García, Ximena ; Radovic, Ljubisa R. / On the structural and reactivity differences between biomass- and coal-derived chars. In: Carbon. 2016 ; Vol. 109. pp. 253-263.
@article{48c6acd2a852458cb80279a7e00a341a,
title = "On the structural and reactivity differences between biomass- and coal-derived chars",
abstract = "Rapidly growing research on biomass reactivity has not benefited enough from the very abundant knowledge acquired on coal-derived materials. Literature comparisons using similar methods are scant and inconclusive. To clarify differences (or similarities) between coal- and biomass-derived chars, we performed a systematic study using three different carbon-based solids at different stages of coalification. Two biomass materials and a low-rank coal were demineralized and heat-treated between 550 and 1450 °C. Even after heat treatment, biomass-derived chars remained less structurally ordered, more microporous, and more reactive towards oxygen than their coal-derived counterparts. Through computational chemistry, we compared the thermodynamic driving forces and kinetic barriers for biomass-like and coal-like representative graphene clusters. The oxidation pathway to CO was the same for both clusters, but different for CO2 formation. We predict that the energy barrier of CO desorption is higher for coal-derived chars, whereas that of CO2 desorption is higher for biomass-derived chars; this is consistent with the dominant formation of CO2 at the relatively low reaction temperatures used in our study. We demonstrate also that in a kinetically controlled reaction regime, in the absence of catalytically active minerals, the reactivity differences can be explained on the basis of differences in char surface chemistry.",
author = "Fernando Vallejos-Burgos and Nicol{\'a}s D{\'i}az-P{\'e}rez and {\'A}lvaro Silva-Villalobos and Romel Jim{\'e}nez and Ximena Garc{\'i}a and Radovic, {Ljubisa R.}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "109",
pages = "253--263",
journal = "Carbon",
issn = "0008-6223",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Vallejos-Burgos, F, Díaz-Pérez, N, Silva-Villalobos, Á, Jiménez, R, García, X & Radovic, LR 2016, 'On the structural and reactivity differences between biomass- and coal-derived chars', Carbon, vol. 109, pp. 253-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.012

On the structural and reactivity differences between biomass- and coal-derived chars. / Vallejos-Burgos, Fernando; Díaz-Pérez, Nicolás; Silva-Villalobos, Álvaro; Jiménez, Romel; García, Ximena; Radovic, Ljubisa R.

In: Carbon, Vol. 109, 01.11.2016, p. 253-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the structural and reactivity differences between biomass- and coal-derived chars

AU - Vallejos-Burgos, Fernando

AU - Díaz-Pérez, Nicolás

AU - Silva-Villalobos, Álvaro

AU - Jiménez, Romel

AU - García, Ximena

AU - Radovic, Ljubisa R.

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Rapidly growing research on biomass reactivity has not benefited enough from the very abundant knowledge acquired on coal-derived materials. Literature comparisons using similar methods are scant and inconclusive. To clarify differences (or similarities) between coal- and biomass-derived chars, we performed a systematic study using three different carbon-based solids at different stages of coalification. Two biomass materials and a low-rank coal were demineralized and heat-treated between 550 and 1450 °C. Even after heat treatment, biomass-derived chars remained less structurally ordered, more microporous, and more reactive towards oxygen than their coal-derived counterparts. Through computational chemistry, we compared the thermodynamic driving forces and kinetic barriers for biomass-like and coal-like representative graphene clusters. The oxidation pathway to CO was the same for both clusters, but different for CO2 formation. We predict that the energy barrier of CO desorption is higher for coal-derived chars, whereas that of CO2 desorption is higher for biomass-derived chars; this is consistent with the dominant formation of CO2 at the relatively low reaction temperatures used in our study. We demonstrate also that in a kinetically controlled reaction regime, in the absence of catalytically active minerals, the reactivity differences can be explained on the basis of differences in char surface chemistry.

AB - Rapidly growing research on biomass reactivity has not benefited enough from the very abundant knowledge acquired on coal-derived materials. Literature comparisons using similar methods are scant and inconclusive. To clarify differences (or similarities) between coal- and biomass-derived chars, we performed a systematic study using three different carbon-based solids at different stages of coalification. Two biomass materials and a low-rank coal were demineralized and heat-treated between 550 and 1450 °C. Even after heat treatment, biomass-derived chars remained less structurally ordered, more microporous, and more reactive towards oxygen than their coal-derived counterparts. Through computational chemistry, we compared the thermodynamic driving forces and kinetic barriers for biomass-like and coal-like representative graphene clusters. The oxidation pathway to CO was the same for both clusters, but different for CO2 formation. We predict that the energy barrier of CO desorption is higher for coal-derived chars, whereas that of CO2 desorption is higher for biomass-derived chars; this is consistent with the dominant formation of CO2 at the relatively low reaction temperatures used in our study. We demonstrate also that in a kinetically controlled reaction regime, in the absence of catalytically active minerals, the reactivity differences can be explained on the basis of differences in char surface chemistry.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981710243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981710243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.012

DO - 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.012

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84981710243

VL - 109

SP - 253

EP - 263

JO - Carbon

JF - Carbon

SN - 0008-6223

ER -

Vallejos-Burgos F, Díaz-Pérez N, Silva-Villalobos Á, Jiménez R, García X, Radovic LR. On the structural and reactivity differences between biomass- and coal-derived chars. Carbon. 2016 Nov 1;109:253-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.012