On the Use and Interpretation of the Emotional Empathy Scale, the Self-Consciousness Scales, and the Self-Monitoring Scale

James Dillard, John E. Hunter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Uncertainty reduction theory argues that certain trait variables influence the process of information gathering. This article examines the validity of scales designed to tap three such trait variables. First- and second-order confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to assess the psychometric adequacy of the Emotional Empathy Scale (Mehrabian & Epstein, 1972), the Self-Consciousness Scales (Fenigstein, Scheier, & Buss, 1975), and the Self-Monitoring Scale (Snyder, 1974). The Emotional Empathy Scale was shown to be construct invalid in that it was multidimensional at both the first- and second-order factor levels. The subscales may be useful, but the composite score is meaningless. The data also showed that the two Self-Consciousness Scales could be reduced to a single second-order factor. This raises some questions about how the scales should be treated, but does not pose any problems for interpreting earlier research. Finally, the Self-Monitoring Scale yielded four primary factors and two second-order factors. Consistent with earlier investigations, this study shows that the scale exhibits very little correspondence to the self-monitoring construct. Its continued use is strongly discouraged. Recommendations for the use and interpretation of research that has employed the scales are offered, and the implications for past and present communication theory are examined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)104-129
Number of pages26
JournalCommunication Research
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1989

Fingerprint

empathy
consciousness
monitoring
interpretation
Monitoring
communication theory
Information theory
psychometrics
uncertainty
present
Composite materials
Self-consciousness
Empathy
Self-monitoring
Emotion

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Communication
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{ac81468ede504ff5aa721507c5a35674,
title = "On the Use and Interpretation of the Emotional Empathy Scale, the Self-Consciousness Scales, and the Self-Monitoring Scale",
abstract = "Uncertainty reduction theory argues that certain trait variables influence the process of information gathering. This article examines the validity of scales designed to tap three such trait variables. First- and second-order confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to assess the psychometric adequacy of the Emotional Empathy Scale (Mehrabian & Epstein, 1972), the Self-Consciousness Scales (Fenigstein, Scheier, & Buss, 1975), and the Self-Monitoring Scale (Snyder, 1974). The Emotional Empathy Scale was shown to be construct invalid in that it was multidimensional at both the first- and second-order factor levels. The subscales may be useful, but the composite score is meaningless. The data also showed that the two Self-Consciousness Scales could be reduced to a single second-order factor. This raises some questions about how the scales should be treated, but does not pose any problems for interpreting earlier research. Finally, the Self-Monitoring Scale yielded four primary factors and two second-order factors. Consistent with earlier investigations, this study shows that the scale exhibits very little correspondence to the self-monitoring construct. Its continued use is strongly discouraged. Recommendations for the use and interpretation of research that has employed the scales are offered, and the implications for past and present communication theory are examined.",
author = "James Dillard and Hunter, {John E.}",
year = "1989",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/009365089016001005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "104--129",
journal = "Communication Research",
issn = "0093-6502",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

On the Use and Interpretation of the Emotional Empathy Scale, the Self-Consciousness Scales, and the Self-Monitoring Scale. / Dillard, James; Hunter, John E.

In: Communication Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.01.1989, p. 104-129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the Use and Interpretation of the Emotional Empathy Scale, the Self-Consciousness Scales, and the Self-Monitoring Scale

AU - Dillard, James

AU - Hunter, John E.

PY - 1989/1/1

Y1 - 1989/1/1

N2 - Uncertainty reduction theory argues that certain trait variables influence the process of information gathering. This article examines the validity of scales designed to tap three such trait variables. First- and second-order confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to assess the psychometric adequacy of the Emotional Empathy Scale (Mehrabian & Epstein, 1972), the Self-Consciousness Scales (Fenigstein, Scheier, & Buss, 1975), and the Self-Monitoring Scale (Snyder, 1974). The Emotional Empathy Scale was shown to be construct invalid in that it was multidimensional at both the first- and second-order factor levels. The subscales may be useful, but the composite score is meaningless. The data also showed that the two Self-Consciousness Scales could be reduced to a single second-order factor. This raises some questions about how the scales should be treated, but does not pose any problems for interpreting earlier research. Finally, the Self-Monitoring Scale yielded four primary factors and two second-order factors. Consistent with earlier investigations, this study shows that the scale exhibits very little correspondence to the self-monitoring construct. Its continued use is strongly discouraged. Recommendations for the use and interpretation of research that has employed the scales are offered, and the implications for past and present communication theory are examined.

AB - Uncertainty reduction theory argues that certain trait variables influence the process of information gathering. This article examines the validity of scales designed to tap three such trait variables. First- and second-order confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to assess the psychometric adequacy of the Emotional Empathy Scale (Mehrabian & Epstein, 1972), the Self-Consciousness Scales (Fenigstein, Scheier, & Buss, 1975), and the Self-Monitoring Scale (Snyder, 1974). The Emotional Empathy Scale was shown to be construct invalid in that it was multidimensional at both the first- and second-order factor levels. The subscales may be useful, but the composite score is meaningless. The data also showed that the two Self-Consciousness Scales could be reduced to a single second-order factor. This raises some questions about how the scales should be treated, but does not pose any problems for interpreting earlier research. Finally, the Self-Monitoring Scale yielded four primary factors and two second-order factors. Consistent with earlier investigations, this study shows that the scale exhibits very little correspondence to the self-monitoring construct. Its continued use is strongly discouraged. Recommendations for the use and interpretation of research that has employed the scales are offered, and the implications for past and present communication theory are examined.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973742093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973742093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/009365089016001005

DO - 10.1177/009365089016001005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84973742093

VL - 16

SP - 104

EP - 129

JO - Communication Research

JF - Communication Research

SN - 0093-6502

IS - 1

ER -