On the validity of an isometric biomechanical model of worker strengths

Don B. Chaffin, Andris Freivalds, Susan M. Evans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the last 18 years the Center for Ergonomics at The University of Michigan has worked to develop a computerized, biomechanically based model to predict worker muscle strengths in various tasks. During the last few years new input strength data has been acquired from published works of others. Worker isometric strength testing also has been performed by the Center in various industries to determine gross lifting, pushing and pulling capabilities of a heterogeneous group of men and women. These data, acquired from 1577 men and women are compared to the strength predictions of the biomechanically based model. For prediction of mean strength capabilities of both men and women performing varied types of symmetric sagittal plane exertions, the model results were relatively unbiased and were well correlated with r2 between 0.85 and 0.88 with the population data. The results were not as good for predicting the mean strengths of two-handed assymetric exertions (r2 between 0.54 and 0.74), and for onehanded, sagittal plane exertions (r2 = 0.50). The utility and limitations of such a modelling approach to human strength prediction are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)280-288
Number of pages9
JournalIIE Transactions (Institute of Industrial Engineers)
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 1987

Fingerprint

Ergonomics
Muscle
Testing
Industry

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

@article{5531a9856d134f0c8af479952afc3c6e,
title = "On the validity of an isometric biomechanical model of worker strengths",
abstract = "Over the last 18 years the Center for Ergonomics at The University of Michigan has worked to develop a computerized, biomechanically based model to predict worker muscle strengths in various tasks. During the last few years new input strength data has been acquired from published works of others. Worker isometric strength testing also has been performed by the Center in various industries to determine gross lifting, pushing and pulling capabilities of a heterogeneous group of men and women. These data, acquired from 1577 men and women are compared to the strength predictions of the biomechanically based model. For prediction of mean strength capabilities of both men and women performing varied types of symmetric sagittal plane exertions, the model results were relatively unbiased and were well correlated with r2 between 0.85 and 0.88 with the population data. The results were not as good for predicting the mean strengths of two-handed assymetric exertions (r2 between 0.54 and 0.74), and for onehanded, sagittal plane exertions (r2 = 0.50). The utility and limitations of such a modelling approach to human strength prediction are discussed.",
author = "Chaffin, {Don B.} and Andris Freivalds and Evans, {Susan M.}",
year = "1987",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/07408178708975397",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "280--288",
journal = "IISE Transactions",
issn = "2472-5854",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

On the validity of an isometric biomechanical model of worker strengths. / Chaffin, Don B.; Freivalds, Andris; Evans, Susan M.

In: IIE Transactions (Institute of Industrial Engineers), Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.09.1987, p. 280-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the validity of an isometric biomechanical model of worker strengths

AU - Chaffin, Don B.

AU - Freivalds, Andris

AU - Evans, Susan M.

PY - 1987/9/1

Y1 - 1987/9/1

N2 - Over the last 18 years the Center for Ergonomics at The University of Michigan has worked to develop a computerized, biomechanically based model to predict worker muscle strengths in various tasks. During the last few years new input strength data has been acquired from published works of others. Worker isometric strength testing also has been performed by the Center in various industries to determine gross lifting, pushing and pulling capabilities of a heterogeneous group of men and women. These data, acquired from 1577 men and women are compared to the strength predictions of the biomechanically based model. For prediction of mean strength capabilities of both men and women performing varied types of symmetric sagittal plane exertions, the model results were relatively unbiased and were well correlated with r2 between 0.85 and 0.88 with the population data. The results were not as good for predicting the mean strengths of two-handed assymetric exertions (r2 between 0.54 and 0.74), and for onehanded, sagittal plane exertions (r2 = 0.50). The utility and limitations of such a modelling approach to human strength prediction are discussed.

AB - Over the last 18 years the Center for Ergonomics at The University of Michigan has worked to develop a computerized, biomechanically based model to predict worker muscle strengths in various tasks. During the last few years new input strength data has been acquired from published works of others. Worker isometric strength testing also has been performed by the Center in various industries to determine gross lifting, pushing and pulling capabilities of a heterogeneous group of men and women. These data, acquired from 1577 men and women are compared to the strength predictions of the biomechanically based model. For prediction of mean strength capabilities of both men and women performing varied types of symmetric sagittal plane exertions, the model results were relatively unbiased and were well correlated with r2 between 0.85 and 0.88 with the population data. The results were not as good for predicting the mean strengths of two-handed assymetric exertions (r2 between 0.54 and 0.74), and for onehanded, sagittal plane exertions (r2 = 0.50). The utility and limitations of such a modelling approach to human strength prediction are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023419195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023419195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07408178708975397

DO - 10.1080/07408178708975397

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 280

EP - 288

JO - IISE Transactions

JF - IISE Transactions

SN - 2472-5854

IS - 3

ER -