On the very idea of a philosophical culture

Or, the American evasion of politics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Carlin Romano has set himself the task of rebranding both the United States and philosophy. His United States is a distinctly philosophical enterprise, and philosophy in this United States is much more democratic and diverse than a mostly white, mostly male, elite-aspirant academic discipline. I endorse a great deal of the argument that supports Romano’s story. I admire his determination to re-read the history and sociology of philosophy, to treat philosophy as a possibility for ordinary people in the grip of the right modes of loquaciousness and inquisitiveness, and to credit contributions from the discipline’s and the country’s underrepresented populations. But to get to his views on these things, I have to bracket one inescapable fact: I do not share his faith in the ideas that provide the cornerstones of his book – the ideas of America and of a philosophical culture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)366-372
Number of pages7
JournalTransactions of the Charles S Peirce Society
Volume52
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

Evasion
Philosophical Culture
Philosophy
Sociology of philosophy
Academic Discipline
History of philosophy
Enterprise
Credit
Elites
Faith

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Cite this

@article{fa1680a4547f4afdad8191403833ce38,
title = "On the very idea of a philosophical culture: Or, the American evasion of politics",
abstract = "Carlin Romano has set himself the task of rebranding both the United States and philosophy. His United States is a distinctly philosophical enterprise, and philosophy in this United States is much more democratic and diverse than a mostly white, mostly male, elite-aspirant academic discipline. I endorse a great deal of the argument that supports Romano’s story. I admire his determination to re-read the history and sociology of philosophy, to treat philosophy as a possibility for ordinary people in the grip of the right modes of loquaciousness and inquisitiveness, and to credit contributions from the discipline’s and the country’s underrepresented populations. But to get to his views on these things, I have to bracket one inescapable fact: I do not share his faith in the ideas that provide the cornerstones of his book – the ideas of America and of a philosophical culture.",
author = "Taylor, {Paul C.}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.52.3.04",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "366--372",
journal = "Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society",
issn = "0009-1774",
publisher = "Indiana University Press",
number = "3",

}

On the very idea of a philosophical culture : Or, the American evasion of politics. / Taylor, Paul C.

In: Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society, Vol. 52, No. 3, 01.06.2016, p. 366-372.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the very idea of a philosophical culture

T2 - Or, the American evasion of politics

AU - Taylor, Paul C.

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Carlin Romano has set himself the task of rebranding both the United States and philosophy. His United States is a distinctly philosophical enterprise, and philosophy in this United States is much more democratic and diverse than a mostly white, mostly male, elite-aspirant academic discipline. I endorse a great deal of the argument that supports Romano’s story. I admire his determination to re-read the history and sociology of philosophy, to treat philosophy as a possibility for ordinary people in the grip of the right modes of loquaciousness and inquisitiveness, and to credit contributions from the discipline’s and the country’s underrepresented populations. But to get to his views on these things, I have to bracket one inescapable fact: I do not share his faith in the ideas that provide the cornerstones of his book – the ideas of America and of a philosophical culture.

AB - Carlin Romano has set himself the task of rebranding both the United States and philosophy. His United States is a distinctly philosophical enterprise, and philosophy in this United States is much more democratic and diverse than a mostly white, mostly male, elite-aspirant academic discipline. I endorse a great deal of the argument that supports Romano’s story. I admire his determination to re-read the history and sociology of philosophy, to treat philosophy as a possibility for ordinary people in the grip of the right modes of loquaciousness and inquisitiveness, and to credit contributions from the discipline’s and the country’s underrepresented populations. But to get to his views on these things, I have to bracket one inescapable fact: I do not share his faith in the ideas that provide the cornerstones of his book – the ideas of America and of a philosophical culture.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007464322&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007464322&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.52.3.04

DO - 10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.52.3.04

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 366

EP - 372

JO - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society

JF - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society

SN - 0009-1774

IS - 3

ER -