One or many? A brief history of culture and cultures in the evolution of "physical culture"

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

At the heart of contemporary kinesiology resides a long history of promoting "physical culture" as a homogenizing and unifying force, linking all of humanity together with a common bond. We routinely prescribe the universal power of physical activity to improve health and well-being across social boundaries and beyond national boundaries. We frame problems and offer solutions that seem to affect all people, in all places, at all times. At the same time, multicultural issues, understood in a broad sense, have captivated students of human movement and shaped the development of the field. The field itself emerged from multiple cultures-academic, intellectual, vocational, and national. The dialectics of culture and the clash of universal and plural perspectives have played an important role in the quest to define the meaning of human movement. Embracing rather than resolving these tensions offers the best strategy for charting creative current and future directions for research and policy in kinesiology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)180-192
Number of pages13
JournalKinesiology Review
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Exercise
Students
Health
Research
Direction compound

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{c11097f7d5c548e4b864209b097c44ff,
title = "One or many? A brief history of culture and cultures in the evolution of {"}physical culture{"}",
abstract = "At the heart of contemporary kinesiology resides a long history of promoting {"}physical culture{"} as a homogenizing and unifying force, linking all of humanity together with a common bond. We routinely prescribe the universal power of physical activity to improve health and well-being across social boundaries and beyond national boundaries. We frame problems and offer solutions that seem to affect all people, in all places, at all times. At the same time, multicultural issues, understood in a broad sense, have captivated students of human movement and shaped the development of the field. The field itself emerged from multiple cultures-academic, intellectual, vocational, and national. The dialectics of culture and the clash of universal and plural perspectives have played an important role in the quest to define the meaning of human movement. Embracing rather than resolving these tensions offers the best strategy for charting creative current and future directions for research and policy in kinesiology.",
author = "Mark Dyreson",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1123/kr.2018-0008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "180--192",
journal = "Kinesiology Review",
issn = "2163-0453",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "2",

}

One or many? A brief history of culture and cultures in the evolution of "physical culture". / Dyreson, Mark.

In: Kinesiology Review, Vol. 7, No. 2, 01.05.2018, p. 180-192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - One or many? A brief history of culture and cultures in the evolution of "physical culture"

AU - Dyreson, Mark

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - At the heart of contemporary kinesiology resides a long history of promoting "physical culture" as a homogenizing and unifying force, linking all of humanity together with a common bond. We routinely prescribe the universal power of physical activity to improve health and well-being across social boundaries and beyond national boundaries. We frame problems and offer solutions that seem to affect all people, in all places, at all times. At the same time, multicultural issues, understood in a broad sense, have captivated students of human movement and shaped the development of the field. The field itself emerged from multiple cultures-academic, intellectual, vocational, and national. The dialectics of culture and the clash of universal and plural perspectives have played an important role in the quest to define the meaning of human movement. Embracing rather than resolving these tensions offers the best strategy for charting creative current and future directions for research and policy in kinesiology.

AB - At the heart of contemporary kinesiology resides a long history of promoting "physical culture" as a homogenizing and unifying force, linking all of humanity together with a common bond. We routinely prescribe the universal power of physical activity to improve health and well-being across social boundaries and beyond national boundaries. We frame problems and offer solutions that seem to affect all people, in all places, at all times. At the same time, multicultural issues, understood in a broad sense, have captivated students of human movement and shaped the development of the field. The field itself emerged from multiple cultures-academic, intellectual, vocational, and national. The dialectics of culture and the clash of universal and plural perspectives have played an important role in the quest to define the meaning of human movement. Embracing rather than resolving these tensions offers the best strategy for charting creative current and future directions for research and policy in kinesiology.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048309554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048309554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1123/kr.2018-0008

DO - 10.1123/kr.2018-0008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048309554

VL - 7

SP - 180

EP - 192

JO - Kinesiology Review

JF - Kinesiology Review

SN - 2163-0453

IS - 2

ER -