One size fits all? Applying theoretical predictions about age and emotional experience to people with functional disabilities

Jennifer R. Piazza, Susan T. Charles, Gloria Luong, David M. Almeida

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current study examined whether commonly observed age differences in affective experience among community samples of healthy adults would generalize to a group of adults who live with significant functional disability. Age differences in daily affect and affective reactivity to daily stressors among a sample of participants with spinal cord injury (SCI) were compared with a noninjured sample. Results revealed that patterns of affective experience varied by sample. Among noninjured adults, older age was associated with lower levels of daily negative affect, higher levels of daily positive affect, and less negative affective reactivity in response to daily stressors. In contrast, among the sample with SCI, no age differences emerged. Findings, which support the model of Strength and Vulnerability Integration, underscore the importance of taking life context into account when predicting age differences in affective well-being.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)930-939
Number of pages10
JournalPsychology and aging
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 31 2015

Fingerprint

Disabled Persons
Spinal Cord Injuries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Aging
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

@article{b009a2c9e1684a31a5ada7b48f31b0f6,
title = "One size fits all? Applying theoretical predictions about age and emotional experience to people with functional disabilities",
abstract = "The current study examined whether commonly observed age differences in affective experience among community samples of healthy adults would generalize to a group of adults who live with significant functional disability. Age differences in daily affect and affective reactivity to daily stressors among a sample of participants with spinal cord injury (SCI) were compared with a noninjured sample. Results revealed that patterns of affective experience varied by sample. Among noninjured adults, older age was associated with lower levels of daily negative affect, higher levels of daily positive affect, and less negative affective reactivity in response to daily stressors. In contrast, among the sample with SCI, no age differences emerged. Findings, which support the model of Strength and Vulnerability Integration, underscore the importance of taking life context into account when predicting age differences in affective well-being.",
author = "Piazza, {Jennifer R.} and Charles, {Susan T.} and Gloria Luong and Almeida, {David M.}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1037/pag0000045",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "930--939",
journal = "Psychology and Aging",
issn = "0882-7974",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

One size fits all? Applying theoretical predictions about age and emotional experience to people with functional disabilities. / Piazza, Jennifer R.; Charles, Susan T.; Luong, Gloria; Almeida, David M.

In: Psychology and aging, Vol. 30, No. 4, 31.08.2015, p. 930-939.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - One size fits all? Applying theoretical predictions about age and emotional experience to people with functional disabilities

AU - Piazza, Jennifer R.

AU - Charles, Susan T.

AU - Luong, Gloria

AU - Almeida, David M.

PY - 2015/8/31

Y1 - 2015/8/31

N2 - The current study examined whether commonly observed age differences in affective experience among community samples of healthy adults would generalize to a group of adults who live with significant functional disability. Age differences in daily affect and affective reactivity to daily stressors among a sample of participants with spinal cord injury (SCI) were compared with a noninjured sample. Results revealed that patterns of affective experience varied by sample. Among noninjured adults, older age was associated with lower levels of daily negative affect, higher levels of daily positive affect, and less negative affective reactivity in response to daily stressors. In contrast, among the sample with SCI, no age differences emerged. Findings, which support the model of Strength and Vulnerability Integration, underscore the importance of taking life context into account when predicting age differences in affective well-being.

AB - The current study examined whether commonly observed age differences in affective experience among community samples of healthy adults would generalize to a group of adults who live with significant functional disability. Age differences in daily affect and affective reactivity to daily stressors among a sample of participants with spinal cord injury (SCI) were compared with a noninjured sample. Results revealed that patterns of affective experience varied by sample. Among noninjured adults, older age was associated with lower levels of daily negative affect, higher levels of daily positive affect, and less negative affective reactivity in response to daily stressors. In contrast, among the sample with SCI, no age differences emerged. Findings, which support the model of Strength and Vulnerability Integration, underscore the importance of taking life context into account when predicting age differences in affective well-being.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940553670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940553670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/pag0000045

DO - 10.1037/pag0000045

M3 - Article

C2 - 26322552

AN - SCOPUS:84940553670

VL - 30

SP - 930

EP - 939

JO - Psychology and Aging

JF - Psychology and Aging

SN - 0882-7974

IS - 4

ER -