Operationalizing relational turbulence theory

Measurement and construct validation

Denise Haunani Solomon, Kellie St Cyr Brisini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study assessed measures operationalizing concepts in relational turbulence theory (Solomon, Knobloch, Theiss, & McLaren, 2016). Studies of relational turbulence in marriage have used measures developed in research on dating couples; therefore, one goal was evaluating these variables in a general population sample of married individuals (N = 1,469). A second goal addressed problems in measures of relational uncertainty by assessing alternative scales. Third, associations between relational turbulence theory variables and measures of cognitive, emotional, and communicative phenomena were estimated. Fourth, the distinctiveness of relational turbulence measures relative to measures of other relational qualities was assessed. The conclusions advance new, Likert relational uncertainty scales and highlight the validity of relational turbulence constructs as distinctive predictors of cognitions, emotions, and communication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)768-789
Number of pages22
JournalPersonal Relationships
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

measurement theory
Uncertainty
uncertainty
Marriage
Cognition
cognition
Emotions
emotion
marriage
Communication
communication
Research
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Anthropology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

@article{68ec926a4f9141be92840c34954ba2c8,
title = "Operationalizing relational turbulence theory: Measurement and construct validation",
abstract = "This study assessed measures operationalizing concepts in relational turbulence theory (Solomon, Knobloch, Theiss, & McLaren, 2016). Studies of relational turbulence in marriage have used measures developed in research on dating couples; therefore, one goal was evaluating these variables in a general population sample of married individuals (N = 1,469). A second goal addressed problems in measures of relational uncertainty by assessing alternative scales. Third, associations between relational turbulence theory variables and measures of cognitive, emotional, and communicative phenomena were estimated. Fourth, the distinctiveness of relational turbulence measures relative to measures of other relational qualities was assessed. The conclusions advance new, Likert relational uncertainty scales and highlight the validity of relational turbulence constructs as distinctive predictors of cognitions, emotions, and communication.",
author = "Solomon, {Denise Haunani} and Brisini, {Kellie St Cyr}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/pere.12212",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "768--789",
journal = "Personal Relationships",
issn = "1350-4126",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Operationalizing relational turbulence theory : Measurement and construct validation. / Solomon, Denise Haunani; Brisini, Kellie St Cyr.

In: Personal Relationships, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.12.2017, p. 768-789.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Operationalizing relational turbulence theory

T2 - Measurement and construct validation

AU - Solomon, Denise Haunani

AU - Brisini, Kellie St Cyr

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - This study assessed measures operationalizing concepts in relational turbulence theory (Solomon, Knobloch, Theiss, & McLaren, 2016). Studies of relational turbulence in marriage have used measures developed in research on dating couples; therefore, one goal was evaluating these variables in a general population sample of married individuals (N = 1,469). A second goal addressed problems in measures of relational uncertainty by assessing alternative scales. Third, associations between relational turbulence theory variables and measures of cognitive, emotional, and communicative phenomena were estimated. Fourth, the distinctiveness of relational turbulence measures relative to measures of other relational qualities was assessed. The conclusions advance new, Likert relational uncertainty scales and highlight the validity of relational turbulence constructs as distinctive predictors of cognitions, emotions, and communication.

AB - This study assessed measures operationalizing concepts in relational turbulence theory (Solomon, Knobloch, Theiss, & McLaren, 2016). Studies of relational turbulence in marriage have used measures developed in research on dating couples; therefore, one goal was evaluating these variables in a general population sample of married individuals (N = 1,469). A second goal addressed problems in measures of relational uncertainty by assessing alternative scales. Third, associations between relational turbulence theory variables and measures of cognitive, emotional, and communicative phenomena were estimated. Fourth, the distinctiveness of relational turbulence measures relative to measures of other relational qualities was assessed. The conclusions advance new, Likert relational uncertainty scales and highlight the validity of relational turbulence constructs as distinctive predictors of cognitions, emotions, and communication.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031677691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031677691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pere.12212

DO - 10.1111/pere.12212

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 768

EP - 789

JO - Personal Relationships

JF - Personal Relationships

SN - 1350-4126

IS - 4

ER -