Opinions among mandated reporters toward child maltreatment reporting policies

Steven Delaronde, Gary King, Robert Bendel, Robert Reece

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study investigates the opinions of social workers, pediatricians, and physician assistants in their support for the existing child maltreatment mandated reporting policy and an alternative reporting policy. Differences in professional training, age, gender, reporting behavior, attitudes towards reporting, and level of certainty needed to report were considered in determining which group of mandated reporters was most likely to support either the existing or an alternative policy. Method: A total of 382 social workers, pediatricians, and physician assistants in Connecticut and Massachusetts completed a self-report questionnaire. This sample represented an overall adjusted response rate of 76%. Results: There was slightly more support for the existing reporting policy compared to the alternative policy. After controlling for age, attitudinal variables, and reporting behavior, social workers were significantly more likely to favor an alternative child maltreatment reporting policy than pediatricians or physician assistants. Also, those mandated reporters who had not consistently reported all suspected cases of maltreatment were significantly more likely to favor the alternative policy than consistent reporters. Conclusions: Because the majority of mandated reporters do not consistently report all suspected cases of maltreatment and support for an alternative reporting policy varies among different groups, consideration of alternative strategies and policies that address the concerns of different types of professionals may be appropriate. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)901-910
Number of pages10
JournalChild Abuse and Neglect
Volume24
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2000

Fingerprint

Child Abuse
Physician Assistants
Age Factors
Self Report

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Delaronde, Steven ; King, Gary ; Bendel, Robert ; Reece, Robert. / Opinions among mandated reporters toward child maltreatment reporting policies. In: Child Abuse and Neglect. 2000 ; Vol. 24, No. 7. pp. 901-910.
@article{b34ae4eaaba64dc894d98d249554420c,
title = "Opinions among mandated reporters toward child maltreatment reporting policies",
abstract = "Objective: This study investigates the opinions of social workers, pediatricians, and physician assistants in their support for the existing child maltreatment mandated reporting policy and an alternative reporting policy. Differences in professional training, age, gender, reporting behavior, attitudes towards reporting, and level of certainty needed to report were considered in determining which group of mandated reporters was most likely to support either the existing or an alternative policy. Method: A total of 382 social workers, pediatricians, and physician assistants in Connecticut and Massachusetts completed a self-report questionnaire. This sample represented an overall adjusted response rate of 76{\%}. Results: There was slightly more support for the existing reporting policy compared to the alternative policy. After controlling for age, attitudinal variables, and reporting behavior, social workers were significantly more likely to favor an alternative child maltreatment reporting policy than pediatricians or physician assistants. Also, those mandated reporters who had not consistently reported all suspected cases of maltreatment were significantly more likely to favor the alternative policy than consistent reporters. Conclusions: Because the majority of mandated reporters do not consistently report all suspected cases of maltreatment and support for an alternative reporting policy varies among different groups, consideration of alternative strategies and policies that address the concerns of different types of professionals may be appropriate. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.",
author = "Steven Delaronde and Gary King and Robert Bendel and Robert Reece",
year = "2000",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00151-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "901--910",
journal = "Child Abuse and Neglect",
issn = "0145-2134",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "7",

}

Opinions among mandated reporters toward child maltreatment reporting policies. / Delaronde, Steven; King, Gary; Bendel, Robert; Reece, Robert.

In: Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 24, No. 7, 01.07.2000, p. 901-910.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Opinions among mandated reporters toward child maltreatment reporting policies

AU - Delaronde, Steven

AU - King, Gary

AU - Bendel, Robert

AU - Reece, Robert

PY - 2000/7/1

Y1 - 2000/7/1

N2 - Objective: This study investigates the opinions of social workers, pediatricians, and physician assistants in their support for the existing child maltreatment mandated reporting policy and an alternative reporting policy. Differences in professional training, age, gender, reporting behavior, attitudes towards reporting, and level of certainty needed to report were considered in determining which group of mandated reporters was most likely to support either the existing or an alternative policy. Method: A total of 382 social workers, pediatricians, and physician assistants in Connecticut and Massachusetts completed a self-report questionnaire. This sample represented an overall adjusted response rate of 76%. Results: There was slightly more support for the existing reporting policy compared to the alternative policy. After controlling for age, attitudinal variables, and reporting behavior, social workers were significantly more likely to favor an alternative child maltreatment reporting policy than pediatricians or physician assistants. Also, those mandated reporters who had not consistently reported all suspected cases of maltreatment were significantly more likely to favor the alternative policy than consistent reporters. Conclusions: Because the majority of mandated reporters do not consistently report all suspected cases of maltreatment and support for an alternative reporting policy varies among different groups, consideration of alternative strategies and policies that address the concerns of different types of professionals may be appropriate. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.

AB - Objective: This study investigates the opinions of social workers, pediatricians, and physician assistants in their support for the existing child maltreatment mandated reporting policy and an alternative reporting policy. Differences in professional training, age, gender, reporting behavior, attitudes towards reporting, and level of certainty needed to report were considered in determining which group of mandated reporters was most likely to support either the existing or an alternative policy. Method: A total of 382 social workers, pediatricians, and physician assistants in Connecticut and Massachusetts completed a self-report questionnaire. This sample represented an overall adjusted response rate of 76%. Results: There was slightly more support for the existing reporting policy compared to the alternative policy. After controlling for age, attitudinal variables, and reporting behavior, social workers were significantly more likely to favor an alternative child maltreatment reporting policy than pediatricians or physician assistants. Also, those mandated reporters who had not consistently reported all suspected cases of maltreatment were significantly more likely to favor the alternative policy than consistent reporters. Conclusions: Because the majority of mandated reporters do not consistently report all suspected cases of maltreatment and support for an alternative reporting policy varies among different groups, consideration of alternative strategies and policies that address the concerns of different types of professionals may be appropriate. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034031555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034031555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00151-4

DO - 10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00151-4

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 901

EP - 910

JO - Child Abuse and Neglect

JF - Child Abuse and Neglect

SN - 0145-2134

IS - 7

ER -