Opportunity for Seatbelt Usage by ALS Providers

Richard T. Cook, Steven A. Meador, Barry D. Buckingham, Lee V. Groff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Prehospital care providers commonly indicate that they cannot wear seat belts owing to their need to be unrestrained while delivering care to the patient in the back of the ambulance. Each year, providers are injured in situations in which seat belts have been shown to be protective. Are ALS providers able to wear a seat belt and provide care in an ambulance? Methods: The ALS providers were asked to complete a form following calls during which they rode with a patient in the back of an ambulance. They indicated the amount of time which they felt they would have needed to have been unrestrained by seat belts and the reasons. There were no attempts to regulate or quantify seat belt usage. Additional information was gathered from the trip report. Results: The percentage of the time of each trip during which they felt they needed to be unrestrained was calculated for each trip. The mean was 41%. The mean transport time was 14.7 minutes. Sub-groupings by protocol type, showed that for cardiac arrest patients, providers felt they needed to be unrestrained for 82% of the duration of transport, for patients with “chest pain or cardiac dysrhythmia” 63%, for “shortness of breath” 38%, and for trauma patients 41%. Excluding cardiac arrest patients, the nine patients were assigned by the providers to have the most critical level of case severity required unrestrained time of 72%. Those nine patients with the lowest severity level requires that the provider by unrestrained only 18% of the time. Management of intravenous line and patient assessments most frequently were cited as reasons for needing to be unrestrained. Conclusion: Perceived need of ALS providers to be unrestrained varied with respect to the type of call, with cardiac arrest patient transports having the greatest need to be unrestrained. However, on the average, providers felt they needed to be unrestrained only 41% of the time; markedly less on some types of calls. The ALS providers should be able to wear seat belts for at least part of the time, on most ALS calls.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)469-471
Number of pages3
JournalPrehospital and Disaster Medicine
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991

Fingerprint

Seat Belts
Ambulances
Heart Arrest
Chest Pain
Dyspnea
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Patient Care
Wounds and Injuries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Emergency

Cite this

Cook, R. T., Meador, S. A., Buckingham, B. D., & Groff, L. V. (1991). Opportunity for Seatbelt Usage by ALS Providers. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 6(4), 469-471. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00038991
Cook, Richard T. ; Meador, Steven A. ; Buckingham, Barry D. ; Groff, Lee V. / Opportunity for Seatbelt Usage by ALS Providers. In: Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. 1991 ; Vol. 6, No. 4. pp. 469-471.
@article{244da4a5346a4e28ab1487c126699254,
title = "Opportunity for Seatbelt Usage by ALS Providers",
abstract = "Purpose: Prehospital care providers commonly indicate that they cannot wear seat belts owing to their need to be unrestrained while delivering care to the patient in the back of the ambulance. Each year, providers are injured in situations in which seat belts have been shown to be protective. Are ALS providers able to wear a seat belt and provide care in an ambulance? Methods: The ALS providers were asked to complete a form following calls during which they rode with a patient in the back of an ambulance. They indicated the amount of time which they felt they would have needed to have been unrestrained by seat belts and the reasons. There were no attempts to regulate or quantify seat belt usage. Additional information was gathered from the trip report. Results: The percentage of the time of each trip during which they felt they needed to be unrestrained was calculated for each trip. The mean was 41{\%}. The mean transport time was 14.7 minutes. Sub-groupings by protocol type, showed that for cardiac arrest patients, providers felt they needed to be unrestrained for 82{\%} of the duration of transport, for patients with “chest pain or cardiac dysrhythmia” 63{\%}, for “shortness of breath” 38{\%}, and for trauma patients 41{\%}. Excluding cardiac arrest patients, the nine patients were assigned by the providers to have the most critical level of case severity required unrestrained time of 72{\%}. Those nine patients with the lowest severity level requires that the provider by unrestrained only 18{\%} of the time. Management of intravenous line and patient assessments most frequently were cited as reasons for needing to be unrestrained. Conclusion: Perceived need of ALS providers to be unrestrained varied with respect to the type of call, with cardiac arrest patient transports having the greatest need to be unrestrained. However, on the average, providers felt they needed to be unrestrained only 41{\%} of the time; markedly less on some types of calls. The ALS providers should be able to wear seat belts for at least part of the time, on most ALS calls.",
author = "Cook, {Richard T.} and Meador, {Steven A.} and Buckingham, {Barry D.} and Groff, {Lee V.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1049023X00038991",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "469--471",
journal = "Prehospital and Disaster Medicine",
issn = "1049-023X",
publisher = "World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine",
number = "4",

}

Cook, RT, Meador, SA, Buckingham, BD & Groff, LV 1991, 'Opportunity for Seatbelt Usage by ALS Providers', Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 469-471. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00038991

Opportunity for Seatbelt Usage by ALS Providers. / Cook, Richard T.; Meador, Steven A.; Buckingham, Barry D.; Groff, Lee V.

In: Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, Vol. 6, No. 4, 01.01.1991, p. 469-471.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Opportunity for Seatbelt Usage by ALS Providers

AU - Cook, Richard T.

AU - Meador, Steven A.

AU - Buckingham, Barry D.

AU - Groff, Lee V.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Prehospital care providers commonly indicate that they cannot wear seat belts owing to their need to be unrestrained while delivering care to the patient in the back of the ambulance. Each year, providers are injured in situations in which seat belts have been shown to be protective. Are ALS providers able to wear a seat belt and provide care in an ambulance? Methods: The ALS providers were asked to complete a form following calls during which they rode with a patient in the back of an ambulance. They indicated the amount of time which they felt they would have needed to have been unrestrained by seat belts and the reasons. There were no attempts to regulate or quantify seat belt usage. Additional information was gathered from the trip report. Results: The percentage of the time of each trip during which they felt they needed to be unrestrained was calculated for each trip. The mean was 41%. The mean transport time was 14.7 minutes. Sub-groupings by protocol type, showed that for cardiac arrest patients, providers felt they needed to be unrestrained for 82% of the duration of transport, for patients with “chest pain or cardiac dysrhythmia” 63%, for “shortness of breath” 38%, and for trauma patients 41%. Excluding cardiac arrest patients, the nine patients were assigned by the providers to have the most critical level of case severity required unrestrained time of 72%. Those nine patients with the lowest severity level requires that the provider by unrestrained only 18% of the time. Management of intravenous line and patient assessments most frequently were cited as reasons for needing to be unrestrained. Conclusion: Perceived need of ALS providers to be unrestrained varied with respect to the type of call, with cardiac arrest patient transports having the greatest need to be unrestrained. However, on the average, providers felt they needed to be unrestrained only 41% of the time; markedly less on some types of calls. The ALS providers should be able to wear seat belts for at least part of the time, on most ALS calls.

AB - Purpose: Prehospital care providers commonly indicate that they cannot wear seat belts owing to their need to be unrestrained while delivering care to the patient in the back of the ambulance. Each year, providers are injured in situations in which seat belts have been shown to be protective. Are ALS providers able to wear a seat belt and provide care in an ambulance? Methods: The ALS providers were asked to complete a form following calls during which they rode with a patient in the back of an ambulance. They indicated the amount of time which they felt they would have needed to have been unrestrained by seat belts and the reasons. There were no attempts to regulate or quantify seat belt usage. Additional information was gathered from the trip report. Results: The percentage of the time of each trip during which they felt they needed to be unrestrained was calculated for each trip. The mean was 41%. The mean transport time was 14.7 minutes. Sub-groupings by protocol type, showed that for cardiac arrest patients, providers felt they needed to be unrestrained for 82% of the duration of transport, for patients with “chest pain or cardiac dysrhythmia” 63%, for “shortness of breath” 38%, and for trauma patients 41%. Excluding cardiac arrest patients, the nine patients were assigned by the providers to have the most critical level of case severity required unrestrained time of 72%. Those nine patients with the lowest severity level requires that the provider by unrestrained only 18% of the time. Management of intravenous line and patient assessments most frequently were cited as reasons for needing to be unrestrained. Conclusion: Perceived need of ALS providers to be unrestrained varied with respect to the type of call, with cardiac arrest patient transports having the greatest need to be unrestrained. However, on the average, providers felt they needed to be unrestrained only 41% of the time; markedly less on some types of calls. The ALS providers should be able to wear seat belts for at least part of the time, on most ALS calls.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84974200327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84974200327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1049023X00038991

DO - 10.1017/S1049023X00038991

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84974200327

VL - 6

SP - 469

EP - 471

JO - Prehospital and Disaster Medicine

JF - Prehospital and Disaster Medicine

SN - 1049-023X

IS - 4

ER -