Optical Solutions: Reception of an NSF-Funded Science Comic Book on the Biology of the Eye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article traces the reception of a “science comic book” by various audiences including readers and reviewers after publication as well as grant application review committees vetting the proposed project in its conceptual stage. Specifically, the work is a biology textbook containing comics-style visual explanations couched in the form of an imaginative story interwoven with and supplementing traditional text-based explanations of the same ideas. The analysis uses Genette’s concept of “paratexts” (i.e., a class of speech genres comprising those supplementary texts that contextualize and inform readers’ interpretations of the primary text that they accompany) to examine the rhetoric of the visual in the discourse of science education. This analysis observes that the stigmatization of comics as a medium played some role in how readers, critics, and reviewers responded to the text. The implications of this stigma for cultural conceptions of science and their relationships to other knowledge domains, including the arts and humanities, raise a concern for the mediation of public impressions of science as an institution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)101-115
Number of pages15
JournalTechnical Communication Quarterly
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 3 2017

Fingerprint

Textbooks
biology
Education
science
stigmatization
mediation
textbook
grant
critic
genre
rhetoric
art
interpretation
discourse
knowledge
education

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Communication

Cite this

@article{d4989a5cba0d4ec18c28d0a40a400889,
title = "Optical Solutions: Reception of an NSF-Funded Science Comic Book on the Biology of the Eye",
abstract = "This article traces the reception of a “science comic book” by various audiences including readers and reviewers after publication as well as grant application review committees vetting the proposed project in its conceptual stage. Specifically, the work is a biology textbook containing comics-style visual explanations couched in the form of an imaginative story interwoven with and supplementing traditional text-based explanations of the same ideas. The analysis uses Genette’s concept of “paratexts” (i.e., a class of speech genres comprising those supplementary texts that contextualize and inform readers’ interpretations of the primary text that they accompany) to examine the rhetoric of the visual in the discourse of science education. This analysis observes that the stigmatization of comics as a medium played some role in how readers, critics, and reviewers responded to the text. The implications of this stigma for cultural conceptions of science and their relationships to other knowledge domains, including the arts and humanities, raise a concern for the mediation of public impressions of science as an institution.",
author = "White, {William Joseph}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/10572252.2017.1285962",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "101--115",
journal = "Technical Communication Quarterly",
issn = "1057-2252",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Optical Solutions : Reception of an NSF-Funded Science Comic Book on the Biology of the Eye. / White, William Joseph.

In: Technical Communication Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 2, 03.04.2017, p. 101-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optical Solutions

T2 - Reception of an NSF-Funded Science Comic Book on the Biology of the Eye

AU - White, William Joseph

PY - 2017/4/3

Y1 - 2017/4/3

N2 - This article traces the reception of a “science comic book” by various audiences including readers and reviewers after publication as well as grant application review committees vetting the proposed project in its conceptual stage. Specifically, the work is a biology textbook containing comics-style visual explanations couched in the form of an imaginative story interwoven with and supplementing traditional text-based explanations of the same ideas. The analysis uses Genette’s concept of “paratexts” (i.e., a class of speech genres comprising those supplementary texts that contextualize and inform readers’ interpretations of the primary text that they accompany) to examine the rhetoric of the visual in the discourse of science education. This analysis observes that the stigmatization of comics as a medium played some role in how readers, critics, and reviewers responded to the text. The implications of this stigma for cultural conceptions of science and their relationships to other knowledge domains, including the arts and humanities, raise a concern for the mediation of public impressions of science as an institution.

AB - This article traces the reception of a “science comic book” by various audiences including readers and reviewers after publication as well as grant application review committees vetting the proposed project in its conceptual stage. Specifically, the work is a biology textbook containing comics-style visual explanations couched in the form of an imaginative story interwoven with and supplementing traditional text-based explanations of the same ideas. The analysis uses Genette’s concept of “paratexts” (i.e., a class of speech genres comprising those supplementary texts that contextualize and inform readers’ interpretations of the primary text that they accompany) to examine the rhetoric of the visual in the discourse of science education. This analysis observes that the stigmatization of comics as a medium played some role in how readers, critics, and reviewers responded to the text. The implications of this stigma for cultural conceptions of science and their relationships to other knowledge domains, including the arts and humanities, raise a concern for the mediation of public impressions of science as an institution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016269553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016269553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10572252.2017.1285962

DO - 10.1080/10572252.2017.1285962

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85016269553

VL - 26

SP - 101

EP - 115

JO - Technical Communication Quarterly

JF - Technical Communication Quarterly

SN - 1057-2252

IS - 2

ER -