Options for assessing PPO quality

Accreditation and profiling as accountability strategies

Dennis Patrick Scanlon, Michael Chernew, Hilary E. Doty, Dean G. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines and discusses various alternatives for measuring the quality of care and services provided by preferred provider organizations (PPOs). The topic is approached from both a conceptual and a practical perspective, outlining key assumptions that underlie the desire to measure the quality of PPOs, while considering the current limitations and difficulties associated with existing PPO arrangements. Although the article does not provide normative judgments about which approach is best, it attempts to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of possible approaches in an unbiased manner. Significant attention is given to accreditation and profiling as possible methods for assessing the quality of care in PPOs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)70-100
Number of pages31
JournalMedical Care Research and Review
Volume58
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 24 2001

Fingerprint

Preferred Provider Organizations
Accreditation
Social Responsibility
Quality of Health Care

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Scanlon, Dennis Patrick ; Chernew, Michael ; Doty, Hilary E. ; Smith, Dean G. / Options for assessing PPO quality : Accreditation and profiling as accountability strategies. In: Medical Care Research and Review. 2001 ; Vol. 58, No. SUPPL. 1. pp. 70-100.
@article{8af3a3634e66438b84d80a20b2b89f7c,
title = "Options for assessing PPO quality: Accreditation and profiling as accountability strategies",
abstract = "This article examines and discusses various alternatives for measuring the quality of care and services provided by preferred provider organizations (PPOs). The topic is approached from both a conceptual and a practical perspective, outlining key assumptions that underlie the desire to measure the quality of PPOs, while considering the current limitations and difficulties associated with existing PPO arrangements. Although the article does not provide normative judgments about which approach is best, it attempts to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of possible approaches in an unbiased manner. Significant attention is given to accreditation and profiling as possible methods for assessing the quality of care in PPOs.",
author = "Scanlon, {Dennis Patrick} and Michael Chernew and Doty, {Hilary E.} and Smith, {Dean G.}",
year = "2001",
month = "11",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1177/107755801773743519",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "70--100",
journal = "Medical Care Research and Review",
issn = "1077-5587",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

Options for assessing PPO quality : Accreditation and profiling as accountability strategies. / Scanlon, Dennis Patrick; Chernew, Michael; Doty, Hilary E.; Smith, Dean G.

In: Medical Care Research and Review, Vol. 58, No. SUPPL. 1, 24.11.2001, p. 70-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Options for assessing PPO quality

T2 - Accreditation and profiling as accountability strategies

AU - Scanlon, Dennis Patrick

AU - Chernew, Michael

AU - Doty, Hilary E.

AU - Smith, Dean G.

PY - 2001/11/24

Y1 - 2001/11/24

N2 - This article examines and discusses various alternatives for measuring the quality of care and services provided by preferred provider organizations (PPOs). The topic is approached from both a conceptual and a practical perspective, outlining key assumptions that underlie the desire to measure the quality of PPOs, while considering the current limitations and difficulties associated with existing PPO arrangements. Although the article does not provide normative judgments about which approach is best, it attempts to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of possible approaches in an unbiased manner. Significant attention is given to accreditation and profiling as possible methods for assessing the quality of care in PPOs.

AB - This article examines and discusses various alternatives for measuring the quality of care and services provided by preferred provider organizations (PPOs). The topic is approached from both a conceptual and a practical perspective, outlining key assumptions that underlie the desire to measure the quality of PPOs, while considering the current limitations and difficulties associated with existing PPO arrangements. Although the article does not provide normative judgments about which approach is best, it attempts to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of possible approaches in an unbiased manner. Significant attention is given to accreditation and profiling as possible methods for assessing the quality of care in PPOs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035168572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035168572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/107755801773743519

DO - 10.1177/107755801773743519

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 70

EP - 100

JO - Medical Care Research and Review

JF - Medical Care Research and Review

SN - 1077-5587

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -