Oregon design professionals views on structural building products in green buildings: Implications for wood

Chris Knowles, Christine Theodoropoulos, Corey Griffin, Jennifer Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Buildings have been shown to have impacts on the environment. Consequently, green building rating systems have become a tool to help reduce these impacts. The objectives of this study were to identify gaps in information and access to green building materials as viewed by Oregon design professionals. The scope was limited to the major structural materials: concrete, steel, and wood. This article focuses on the results unique to wood products. Information was collected through group interviews. Each group was composed of professionals representing different aspects of material selection and construction of different scales. The results showed that structural material selection is driven by building code, cost, and building performance requirements. The environmental performance of the material was not considered. However, once the material was selected, designers tried to maximize environmental performance. The results showed that green building rating systems do not influence structural material selection, and interviewees noted that there is room for improvement in this area. Respondents had a positive view of wood and a strong desire to use more wood, particularly Forest Stewardship Council certified wood. Wood was viewed as the most sustainable structural material available. However, there were some concerns about wood products, with formaldehyde emissions being the most significant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)390-400
Number of pages11
JournalCanadian Journal of Forest Research
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

wood products
green building
product
material
formaldehyde
steel
interviews
cost
environmental performance
wood product

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Forestry
  • Ecology

Cite this

Knowles, Chris ; Theodoropoulos, Christine ; Griffin, Corey ; Allen, Jennifer. / Oregon design professionals views on structural building products in green buildings : Implications for wood. In: Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 2011 ; Vol. 41, No. 2. pp. 390-400.
@article{2808d8f7ca6946db87670cefb0dd8d45,
title = "Oregon design professionals views on structural building products in green buildings: Implications for wood",
abstract = "Buildings have been shown to have impacts on the environment. Consequently, green building rating systems have become a tool to help reduce these impacts. The objectives of this study were to identify gaps in information and access to green building materials as viewed by Oregon design professionals. The scope was limited to the major structural materials: concrete, steel, and wood. This article focuses on the results unique to wood products. Information was collected through group interviews. Each group was composed of professionals representing different aspects of material selection and construction of different scales. The results showed that structural material selection is driven by building code, cost, and building performance requirements. The environmental performance of the material was not considered. However, once the material was selected, designers tried to maximize environmental performance. The results showed that green building rating systems do not influence structural material selection, and interviewees noted that there is room for improvement in this area. Respondents had a positive view of wood and a strong desire to use more wood, particularly Forest Stewardship Council certified wood. Wood was viewed as the most sustainable structural material available. However, there were some concerns about wood products, with formaldehyde emissions being the most significant.",
author = "Chris Knowles and Christine Theodoropoulos and Corey Griffin and Jennifer Allen",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1139/X10-209",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "390--400",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Forest Research",
issn = "0045-5067",
publisher = "National Research Council of Canada",
number = "2",

}

Oregon design professionals views on structural building products in green buildings : Implications for wood. / Knowles, Chris; Theodoropoulos, Christine; Griffin, Corey; Allen, Jennifer.

In: Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 41, No. 2, 01.01.2011, p. 390-400.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Oregon design professionals views on structural building products in green buildings

T2 - Implications for wood

AU - Knowles, Chris

AU - Theodoropoulos, Christine

AU - Griffin, Corey

AU - Allen, Jennifer

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Buildings have been shown to have impacts on the environment. Consequently, green building rating systems have become a tool to help reduce these impacts. The objectives of this study were to identify gaps in information and access to green building materials as viewed by Oregon design professionals. The scope was limited to the major structural materials: concrete, steel, and wood. This article focuses on the results unique to wood products. Information was collected through group interviews. Each group was composed of professionals representing different aspects of material selection and construction of different scales. The results showed that structural material selection is driven by building code, cost, and building performance requirements. The environmental performance of the material was not considered. However, once the material was selected, designers tried to maximize environmental performance. The results showed that green building rating systems do not influence structural material selection, and interviewees noted that there is room for improvement in this area. Respondents had a positive view of wood and a strong desire to use more wood, particularly Forest Stewardship Council certified wood. Wood was viewed as the most sustainable structural material available. However, there were some concerns about wood products, with formaldehyde emissions being the most significant.

AB - Buildings have been shown to have impacts on the environment. Consequently, green building rating systems have become a tool to help reduce these impacts. The objectives of this study were to identify gaps in information and access to green building materials as viewed by Oregon design professionals. The scope was limited to the major structural materials: concrete, steel, and wood. This article focuses on the results unique to wood products. Information was collected through group interviews. Each group was composed of professionals representing different aspects of material selection and construction of different scales. The results showed that structural material selection is driven by building code, cost, and building performance requirements. The environmental performance of the material was not considered. However, once the material was selected, designers tried to maximize environmental performance. The results showed that green building rating systems do not influence structural material selection, and interviewees noted that there is room for improvement in this area. Respondents had a positive view of wood and a strong desire to use more wood, particularly Forest Stewardship Council certified wood. Wood was viewed as the most sustainable structural material available. However, there were some concerns about wood products, with formaldehyde emissions being the most significant.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78951485571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78951485571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1139/X10-209

DO - 10.1139/X10-209

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78951485571

VL - 41

SP - 390

EP - 400

JO - Canadian Journal of Forest Research

JF - Canadian Journal of Forest Research

SN - 0045-5067

IS - 2

ER -