Organic and conventional Washington State farmers' opinions on GM crops and marketing strategies

Leland Luther Glenna, Raymond A. Jussaume

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A 1999 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) policy on organic certification excluded the use of genetically modified (GM) crops. The decision remains controversial because it provokes debate over the fundamental meaning of organic agriculture. Some scholars, farmers and activists claim that organic agriculture represents a value orientation that is opposed to trends in industrial agriculture, of which GM crops are the latest product. Because organic farmers are a significant constituency in this debate, we examined their values and practices related to marketing, environment and GM crops. From a survey of 1181 Washington State farmers, we created a sub-sample of 598 crop farmers (fruits, vegetables and grains), of which 109 described themselves as organic (certified organic, moving towards organic certification and non-certified organic), and we analyzed organic and conventional farmer responses to a number of issues to discern comparative commitment to self-seeking economic interests. Results reveal differences among conventional and organic farmers on GM crops and several marketing and environmental values and practices, suggesting that there is some validity to portraying organic agriculture as an alternative vision to industrial agriculture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)118-124
Number of pages7
JournalRenewable Agriculture and Food Systems
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2007

Fingerprint

farmers' attitudes
marketing strategies
Marketing
Organic Agriculture
farmers
crops
organic certification
organic production
Certification
Agriculture
marketing
activists
agriculture
Social Values
United States Department of Agriculture
ecological value
USDA
Vegetables
Farmers
Fruit

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Food Science

Cite this

@article{1d9ad11f617a4d1da5f3dfaf9a256ccc,
title = "Organic and conventional Washington State farmers' opinions on GM crops and marketing strategies",
abstract = "A 1999 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) policy on organic certification excluded the use of genetically modified (GM) crops. The decision remains controversial because it provokes debate over the fundamental meaning of organic agriculture. Some scholars, farmers and activists claim that organic agriculture represents a value orientation that is opposed to trends in industrial agriculture, of which GM crops are the latest product. Because organic farmers are a significant constituency in this debate, we examined their values and practices related to marketing, environment and GM crops. From a survey of 1181 Washington State farmers, we created a sub-sample of 598 crop farmers (fruits, vegetables and grains), of which 109 described themselves as organic (certified organic, moving towards organic certification and non-certified organic), and we analyzed organic and conventional farmer responses to a number of issues to discern comparative commitment to self-seeking economic interests. Results reveal differences among conventional and organic farmers on GM crops and several marketing and environmental values and practices, suggesting that there is some validity to portraying organic agriculture as an alternative vision to industrial agriculture.",
author = "Glenna, {Leland Luther} and Jussaume, {Raymond A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1742170507001603",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "118--124",
journal = "Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems",
issn = "1742-1705",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

Organic and conventional Washington State farmers' opinions on GM crops and marketing strategies. / Glenna, Leland Luther; Jussaume, Raymond A.

In: Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, Vol. 22, No. 2, 01.06.2007, p. 118-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organic and conventional Washington State farmers' opinions on GM crops and marketing strategies

AU - Glenna, Leland Luther

AU - Jussaume, Raymond A.

PY - 2007/6/1

Y1 - 2007/6/1

N2 - A 1999 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) policy on organic certification excluded the use of genetically modified (GM) crops. The decision remains controversial because it provokes debate over the fundamental meaning of organic agriculture. Some scholars, farmers and activists claim that organic agriculture represents a value orientation that is opposed to trends in industrial agriculture, of which GM crops are the latest product. Because organic farmers are a significant constituency in this debate, we examined their values and practices related to marketing, environment and GM crops. From a survey of 1181 Washington State farmers, we created a sub-sample of 598 crop farmers (fruits, vegetables and grains), of which 109 described themselves as organic (certified organic, moving towards organic certification and non-certified organic), and we analyzed organic and conventional farmer responses to a number of issues to discern comparative commitment to self-seeking economic interests. Results reveal differences among conventional and organic farmers on GM crops and several marketing and environmental values and practices, suggesting that there is some validity to portraying organic agriculture as an alternative vision to industrial agriculture.

AB - A 1999 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) policy on organic certification excluded the use of genetically modified (GM) crops. The decision remains controversial because it provokes debate over the fundamental meaning of organic agriculture. Some scholars, farmers and activists claim that organic agriculture represents a value orientation that is opposed to trends in industrial agriculture, of which GM crops are the latest product. Because organic farmers are a significant constituency in this debate, we examined their values and practices related to marketing, environment and GM crops. From a survey of 1181 Washington State farmers, we created a sub-sample of 598 crop farmers (fruits, vegetables and grains), of which 109 described themselves as organic (certified organic, moving towards organic certification and non-certified organic), and we analyzed organic and conventional farmer responses to a number of issues to discern comparative commitment to self-seeking economic interests. Results reveal differences among conventional and organic farmers on GM crops and several marketing and environmental values and practices, suggesting that there is some validity to portraying organic agriculture as an alternative vision to industrial agriculture.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547433198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547433198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1742170507001603

DO - 10.1017/S1742170507001603

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 118

EP - 124

JO - Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

JF - Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

SN - 1742-1705

IS - 2

ER -