Origins and effects of legal significs

Jan M. Broekman, Larry Cata Backer

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Legal semiotics in the guise of legal significs was for the first time exposed in the PhD dissertation of De Haan in Amsterdam, 1916. That publication can in hindsight be seen as the first work on legal semiotics, and the same year the first inaugural lecture took place at the University of Amsterdam, as translated in this volume. De Haan underlines that a better language of law contributes to a better law. Legal language is at its best when it articulates the relevant situation in its best legal terms, but there is no such articulation of language if it is not psychologically well founded. De Haan's signific ideal is that law fits to reality in a one-to-one meaning relation between life facts and legal facts. Significs as developed in the beginning of the 20th century differs from semiotics because the first had to fight seriously for the recognition of the concept of meaning and in particular, as de Haan reports literally, for accepting the question pertaining to the meaning of meaning—long before Ogden Richards’ 1923 The Meaning of Meaning, which was conceived as a study of the influence of language upon thought, and by no means to significs or to semiotics. We do not know anymore how Lady Welby and the Amsterdam Circle had to fight for the recognition of the meaning issue—in our days it seems not only evident but is also very fashionable in sciences and philosophy. It all pertains to the birthplace of semiotics!

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSigns in Law - A Source Book
Subtitle of host publicationThe Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages27-30
Number of pages4
ISBN (Electronic)9783319098371
ISBN (Print)9783319098364
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

semiotics
Language
language
Law
Publications
earning a doctorate
know how
science
Amsterdam

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Broekman, J. M., & Backer, L. C. (2015). Origins and effects of legal significs. In Signs in Law - A Source Book: The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III (pp. 27-30). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09837-1_3
Broekman, Jan M. ; Backer, Larry Cata. / Origins and effects of legal significs. Signs in Law - A Source Book: The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III. Springer International Publishing, 2015. pp. 27-30
@inbook{54462d642fac43afad3916031d0123c1,
title = "Origins and effects of legal significs",
abstract = "Legal semiotics in the guise of legal significs was for the first time exposed in the PhD dissertation of De Haan in Amsterdam, 1916. That publication can in hindsight be seen as the first work on legal semiotics, and the same year the first inaugural lecture took place at the University of Amsterdam, as translated in this volume. De Haan underlines that a better language of law contributes to a better law. Legal language is at its best when it articulates the relevant situation in its best legal terms, but there is no such articulation of language if it is not psychologically well founded. De Haan's signific ideal is that law fits to reality in a one-to-one meaning relation between life facts and legal facts. Significs as developed in the beginning of the 20th century differs from semiotics because the first had to fight seriously for the recognition of the concept of meaning and in particular, as de Haan reports literally, for accepting the question pertaining to the meaning of meaning—long before Ogden Richards’ 1923 The Meaning of Meaning, which was conceived as a study of the influence of language upon thought, and by no means to significs or to semiotics. We do not know anymore how Lady Welby and the Amsterdam Circle had to fight for the recognition of the meaning issue—in our days it seems not only evident but is also very fashionable in sciences and philosophy. It all pertains to the birthplace of semiotics!",
author = "Broekman, {Jan M.} and Backer, {Larry Cata}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-09837-1_3",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783319098364",
pages = "27--30",
booktitle = "Signs in Law - A Source Book",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

Broekman, JM & Backer, LC 2015, Origins and effects of legal significs. in Signs in Law - A Source Book: The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III. Springer International Publishing, pp. 27-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09837-1_3

Origins and effects of legal significs. / Broekman, Jan M.; Backer, Larry Cata.

Signs in Law - A Source Book: The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III. Springer International Publishing, 2015. p. 27-30.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Origins and effects of legal significs

AU - Broekman, Jan M.

AU - Backer, Larry Cata

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Legal semiotics in the guise of legal significs was for the first time exposed in the PhD dissertation of De Haan in Amsterdam, 1916. That publication can in hindsight be seen as the first work on legal semiotics, and the same year the first inaugural lecture took place at the University of Amsterdam, as translated in this volume. De Haan underlines that a better language of law contributes to a better law. Legal language is at its best when it articulates the relevant situation in its best legal terms, but there is no such articulation of language if it is not psychologically well founded. De Haan's signific ideal is that law fits to reality in a one-to-one meaning relation between life facts and legal facts. Significs as developed in the beginning of the 20th century differs from semiotics because the first had to fight seriously for the recognition of the concept of meaning and in particular, as de Haan reports literally, for accepting the question pertaining to the meaning of meaning—long before Ogden Richards’ 1923 The Meaning of Meaning, which was conceived as a study of the influence of language upon thought, and by no means to significs or to semiotics. We do not know anymore how Lady Welby and the Amsterdam Circle had to fight for the recognition of the meaning issue—in our days it seems not only evident but is also very fashionable in sciences and philosophy. It all pertains to the birthplace of semiotics!

AB - Legal semiotics in the guise of legal significs was for the first time exposed in the PhD dissertation of De Haan in Amsterdam, 1916. That publication can in hindsight be seen as the first work on legal semiotics, and the same year the first inaugural lecture took place at the University of Amsterdam, as translated in this volume. De Haan underlines that a better language of law contributes to a better law. Legal language is at its best when it articulates the relevant situation in its best legal terms, but there is no such articulation of language if it is not psychologically well founded. De Haan's signific ideal is that law fits to reality in a one-to-one meaning relation between life facts and legal facts. Significs as developed in the beginning of the 20th century differs from semiotics because the first had to fight seriously for the recognition of the concept of meaning and in particular, as de Haan reports literally, for accepting the question pertaining to the meaning of meaning—long before Ogden Richards’ 1923 The Meaning of Meaning, which was conceived as a study of the influence of language upon thought, and by no means to significs or to semiotics. We do not know anymore how Lady Welby and the Amsterdam Circle had to fight for the recognition of the meaning issue—in our days it seems not only evident but is also very fashionable in sciences and philosophy. It all pertains to the birthplace of semiotics!

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955407857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955407857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-09837-1_3

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-09837-1_3

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84955407857

SN - 9783319098364

SP - 27

EP - 30

BT - Signs in Law - A Source Book

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -

Broekman JM, Backer LC. Origins and effects of legal significs. In Signs in Law - A Source Book: The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III. Springer International Publishing. 2015. p. 27-30 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09837-1_3