Orthogonal Comparison of GC-MS and 1H NMR Spectroscopy for Short Chain Fatty Acid Quantitation

Jingwei Cai, Jingtao Zhang, Yuan Tian, Limin Zhang, Emmanuel Hatzakis, Kristopher W. Krausz, Philip B. Smith, Frank J. Gonzalez, Andrew David Patterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are important regulators of host physiology and metabolism and may contribute to obesity and associated metabolic diseases. Interest in SCFAs has increased in part due to the recognized importance of how production of SCFAs by the microbiota may signal to the host. Therefore, reliable, reproducible, and affordable methods for SCFA profiling are required for accurate identification and quantitation. In the current study, four different methods for SCFA (acetic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid) extraction and quantitation were compared using two independent platforms including gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Sensitivity, recovery, repeatability, matrix effect, and validation using mouse fecal samples were determined across all methods. The GC-MS propyl esterification method exhibited superior sensitivity for acetic acid and butyric acid measurement (LOD < 0.01 μg mL-1, LOQ < 0.1 μg mL-1) and recovery accuracy (99.4%-108.3% recovery rate for 100 μg mL-1 SCFA mixed standard spike in and 97.8%-101.8% recovery rate for 250 μg mL-1 SCFAs mixed standard spike in). NMR methods by either quantitation relative to an internal standard or quantitation using a calibration curve yielded better repeatability and minimal matrix effects compared to GC-MS methods. All methods generated good calibration curve linearity (R2 > 0.99) and comparable measurement of fecal SCFA concentration. Lastly, these methods were used to quantitate fecal SCFAs obtained from conventionally raised (CONV-R) and germ free (GF) mice. Results from global metabolomic analysis of feces generated by 1H NMR and bomb calorimetry were used to further validate these approaches.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7900-7906
Number of pages7
JournalAnalytical Chemistry
Volume89
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Volatile Fatty Acids
Gas chromatography
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Mass spectrometry
Butyric Acid
Acetic Acid
Physiology
Esterification
Calorimetry
Metabolism
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Recovery

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Analytical Chemistry

Cite this

Cai, Jingwei ; Zhang, Jingtao ; Tian, Yuan ; Zhang, Limin ; Hatzakis, Emmanuel ; Krausz, Kristopher W. ; Smith, Philip B. ; Gonzalez, Frank J. ; Patterson, Andrew David. / Orthogonal Comparison of GC-MS and 1H NMR Spectroscopy for Short Chain Fatty Acid Quantitation. In: Analytical Chemistry. 2017 ; Vol. 89, No. 15. pp. 7900-7906.
@article{ec23da4dcfa148428f63542a6f88f04f,
title = "Orthogonal Comparison of GC-MS and 1H NMR Spectroscopy for Short Chain Fatty Acid Quantitation",
abstract = "Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are important regulators of host physiology and metabolism and may contribute to obesity and associated metabolic diseases. Interest in SCFAs has increased in part due to the recognized importance of how production of SCFAs by the microbiota may signal to the host. Therefore, reliable, reproducible, and affordable methods for SCFA profiling are required for accurate identification and quantitation. In the current study, four different methods for SCFA (acetic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid) extraction and quantitation were compared using two independent platforms including gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Sensitivity, recovery, repeatability, matrix effect, and validation using mouse fecal samples were determined across all methods. The GC-MS propyl esterification method exhibited superior sensitivity for acetic acid and butyric acid measurement (LOD < 0.01 μg mL-1, LOQ < 0.1 μg mL-1) and recovery accuracy (99.4{\%}-108.3{\%} recovery rate for 100 μg mL-1 SCFA mixed standard spike in and 97.8{\%}-101.8{\%} recovery rate for 250 μg mL-1 SCFAs mixed standard spike in). NMR methods by either quantitation relative to an internal standard or quantitation using a calibration curve yielded better repeatability and minimal matrix effects compared to GC-MS methods. All methods generated good calibration curve linearity (R2 > 0.99) and comparable measurement of fecal SCFA concentration. Lastly, these methods were used to quantitate fecal SCFAs obtained from conventionally raised (CONV-R) and germ free (GF) mice. Results from global metabolomic analysis of feces generated by 1H NMR and bomb calorimetry were used to further validate these approaches.",
author = "Jingwei Cai and Jingtao Zhang and Yuan Tian and Limin Zhang and Emmanuel Hatzakis and Krausz, {Kristopher W.} and Smith, {Philip B.} and Gonzalez, {Frank J.} and Patterson, {Andrew David}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00848",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "7900--7906",
journal = "Analytical Chemistry",
issn = "0003-2700",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "15",

}

Orthogonal Comparison of GC-MS and 1H NMR Spectroscopy for Short Chain Fatty Acid Quantitation. / Cai, Jingwei; Zhang, Jingtao; Tian, Yuan; Zhang, Limin; Hatzakis, Emmanuel; Krausz, Kristopher W.; Smith, Philip B.; Gonzalez, Frank J.; Patterson, Andrew David.

In: Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 89, No. 15, 01.08.2017, p. 7900-7906.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Orthogonal Comparison of GC-MS and 1H NMR Spectroscopy for Short Chain Fatty Acid Quantitation

AU - Cai, Jingwei

AU - Zhang, Jingtao

AU - Tian, Yuan

AU - Zhang, Limin

AU - Hatzakis, Emmanuel

AU - Krausz, Kristopher W.

AU - Smith, Philip B.

AU - Gonzalez, Frank J.

AU - Patterson, Andrew David

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are important regulators of host physiology and metabolism and may contribute to obesity and associated metabolic diseases. Interest in SCFAs has increased in part due to the recognized importance of how production of SCFAs by the microbiota may signal to the host. Therefore, reliable, reproducible, and affordable methods for SCFA profiling are required for accurate identification and quantitation. In the current study, four different methods for SCFA (acetic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid) extraction and quantitation were compared using two independent platforms including gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Sensitivity, recovery, repeatability, matrix effect, and validation using mouse fecal samples were determined across all methods. The GC-MS propyl esterification method exhibited superior sensitivity for acetic acid and butyric acid measurement (LOD < 0.01 μg mL-1, LOQ < 0.1 μg mL-1) and recovery accuracy (99.4%-108.3% recovery rate for 100 μg mL-1 SCFA mixed standard spike in and 97.8%-101.8% recovery rate for 250 μg mL-1 SCFAs mixed standard spike in). NMR methods by either quantitation relative to an internal standard or quantitation using a calibration curve yielded better repeatability and minimal matrix effects compared to GC-MS methods. All methods generated good calibration curve linearity (R2 > 0.99) and comparable measurement of fecal SCFA concentration. Lastly, these methods were used to quantitate fecal SCFAs obtained from conventionally raised (CONV-R) and germ free (GF) mice. Results from global metabolomic analysis of feces generated by 1H NMR and bomb calorimetry were used to further validate these approaches.

AB - Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are important regulators of host physiology and metabolism and may contribute to obesity and associated metabolic diseases. Interest in SCFAs has increased in part due to the recognized importance of how production of SCFAs by the microbiota may signal to the host. Therefore, reliable, reproducible, and affordable methods for SCFA profiling are required for accurate identification and quantitation. In the current study, four different methods for SCFA (acetic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid) extraction and quantitation were compared using two independent platforms including gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Sensitivity, recovery, repeatability, matrix effect, and validation using mouse fecal samples were determined across all methods. The GC-MS propyl esterification method exhibited superior sensitivity for acetic acid and butyric acid measurement (LOD < 0.01 μg mL-1, LOQ < 0.1 μg mL-1) and recovery accuracy (99.4%-108.3% recovery rate for 100 μg mL-1 SCFA mixed standard spike in and 97.8%-101.8% recovery rate for 250 μg mL-1 SCFAs mixed standard spike in). NMR methods by either quantitation relative to an internal standard or quantitation using a calibration curve yielded better repeatability and minimal matrix effects compared to GC-MS methods. All methods generated good calibration curve linearity (R2 > 0.99) and comparable measurement of fecal SCFA concentration. Lastly, these methods were used to quantitate fecal SCFAs obtained from conventionally raised (CONV-R) and germ free (GF) mice. Results from global metabolomic analysis of feces generated by 1H NMR and bomb calorimetry were used to further validate these approaches.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026660784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026660784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00848

DO - 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00848

M3 - Article

C2 - 28650151

AN - SCOPUS:85026660784

VL - 89

SP - 7900

EP - 7906

JO - Analytical Chemistry

JF - Analytical Chemistry

SN - 0003-2700

IS - 15

ER -