Outcomes and Anticoagulation Use After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

James V. Freeman, Peter Shrader, Karen S. Pieper, Larry A. Allen, Paul S. Chan, Gregg C. Fonarow, Bernard J. Gersh, Peter R. Kowey, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, Gerald Naccarelli, James A. Reiffel, Daniel E. Singer, Alan S. Go, Elaine M. Hylek, Benjamin A. Steinberg, Eric D. Peterson, Jonathan P. Piccini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Studies evaluating the effects of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic therapy on outcomes have shown mixed results. In addition, guidelines recommend continuing oral anticoagulation (OAC) after ablation for those at risk of stroke, but real-world data are lacking. Methods: We evaluated outcomes including death, myocardial infarction, stroke or systemic embolism, intracranial bleeding, major bleeding, and hospitalization in patients undergoing AF ablation compared with a propensity score matched cohort of patients treated with anti-arrhythmic medications only in the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation registries. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to evaluate the association between AF ablation and outcomes. We then evaluated patterns of treatment with OAC among AF ablation patients. Results: Among 21 595 patients, 1190 (6%) underwent de novo AF ablation. Our propensity score-matched cohort included 1087 patients who underwent AF ablation matched 1:1 with 1087 patients treated with antiarrhythmic medications only. There were no significant differences in the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death, and most other major adverse cardiovascular and neurological events. AF catheter ablation was associated with an increased risk of all-cause hospitalization during follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.05-1.46]), particularly in the first 3 months (the standard blanking period) after the procedure. Among those who underwent AF ablation with a CHA2DS2 VASc score ≥2 for men and ≥3 for women, 23% had OAC discontinued after ablation. Among those who discontinued OAC, the median time to discontinuation was 6.2 months. Conclusions: In this large US national registry, we found no difference in adjusted rates of cardiovascular or all-cause death between patients treated with AF catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic medications only. Notably, discontinuation of OAC after ablation remains relatively common despite guideline recommendations for continued stroke prevention therapy in patients at risk of stroke.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere007612
JournalCirculation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Volume12
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2019

    Fingerprint

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Freeman, J. V., Shrader, P., Pieper, K. S., Allen, L. A., Chan, P. S., Fonarow, G. C., ... Piccini, J. P. (2019). Outcomes and Anticoagulation Use After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 12(12), [e007612]. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007612