Overcompensating for severe service failure: Perceived fairness and effect on negative word-of-mouth intent

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to examine the perceived fairness of overcompensation for severe service failures. The mediating effect of perceived fairness in the overcompensation-negative word-of-mouth (NWOM) intent relationship is also explored. Design/methodology/approach: An experimental design approach was utilized to test the study's hypotheses. Overcompensation amount was manipulated at three levels (50 percent, 100 percent, 200 percent of purchase price), with two forms of overcompensation (cash or credit) tested. Findings: Cash-based overcompensation yielded higher perceptions of distributive justice than full compensation, with no significant difference in distributive justice perceptions across cash amounts. Credit-based overcompensation was perceived as no fairer than full compensation. Perceived distributive justice fully mediates the overcompensation-NWOM intent relationship. Research limitations/implications: The study's findings are based on a single service context. Further research across different service environments is needed to confirm the robustness of the results. The results are based on scenarios rather than real events. A longitudinal field study that examines consumer reaction at the point of service recovery and tracks actual subsequent behaviors is merited. Practical implications: The study's findings suggest that, when a severe service failure occurs, service firms should consider going beyond full compensation, offering the consumer an additional cash amount. However, more is not necessarily better - a small additional cash amount may induce similar perceptions of fairness to larger amounts. Originality/value: This study yields insights into the perceptions of distributive justice associated with different amounts and forms of overcompensation for severe service failure, and demonstrates the mediating effect of perceived distributive justice in the overcompensation-NWOM intent relationship.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)342-351
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Services Marketing
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2012

Fingerprint

Perceived fairness
Service failure
Distributive justice
Negative word-of-mouth
Cash
Mediating effect
Credit
Experimental design
Scenarios
Robustness
Design methodology
Field study
Service recovery
Fairness
Service firms
Purchase

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{44b24de552c944b6a64c37d9da78de50,
title = "Overcompensating for severe service failure: Perceived fairness and effect on negative word-of-mouth intent",
abstract = "Purpose: This study aims to examine the perceived fairness of overcompensation for severe service failures. The mediating effect of perceived fairness in the overcompensation-negative word-of-mouth (NWOM) intent relationship is also explored. Design/methodology/approach: An experimental design approach was utilized to test the study's hypotheses. Overcompensation amount was manipulated at three levels (50 percent, 100 percent, 200 percent of purchase price), with two forms of overcompensation (cash or credit) tested. Findings: Cash-based overcompensation yielded higher perceptions of distributive justice than full compensation, with no significant difference in distributive justice perceptions across cash amounts. Credit-based overcompensation was perceived as no fairer than full compensation. Perceived distributive justice fully mediates the overcompensation-NWOM intent relationship. Research limitations/implications: The study's findings are based on a single service context. Further research across different service environments is needed to confirm the robustness of the results. The results are based on scenarios rather than real events. A longitudinal field study that examines consumer reaction at the point of service recovery and tracks actual subsequent behaviors is merited. Practical implications: The study's findings suggest that, when a severe service failure occurs, service firms should consider going beyond full compensation, offering the consumer an additional cash amount. However, more is not necessarily better - a small additional cash amount may induce similar perceptions of fairness to larger amounts. Originality/value: This study yields insights into the perceptions of distributive justice associated with different amounts and forms of overcompensation for severe service failure, and demonstrates the mediating effect of perceived distributive justice in the overcompensation-NWOM intent relationship.",
author = "Noone, {Breffni M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/08876041211245254",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "342--351",
journal = "Journal of Services Marketing",
issn = "0887-6045",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Overcompensating for severe service failure

T2 - Perceived fairness and effect on negative word-of-mouth intent

AU - Noone, Breffni M.

PY - 2012/7/1

Y1 - 2012/7/1

N2 - Purpose: This study aims to examine the perceived fairness of overcompensation for severe service failures. The mediating effect of perceived fairness in the overcompensation-negative word-of-mouth (NWOM) intent relationship is also explored. Design/methodology/approach: An experimental design approach was utilized to test the study's hypotheses. Overcompensation amount was manipulated at three levels (50 percent, 100 percent, 200 percent of purchase price), with two forms of overcompensation (cash or credit) tested. Findings: Cash-based overcompensation yielded higher perceptions of distributive justice than full compensation, with no significant difference in distributive justice perceptions across cash amounts. Credit-based overcompensation was perceived as no fairer than full compensation. Perceived distributive justice fully mediates the overcompensation-NWOM intent relationship. Research limitations/implications: The study's findings are based on a single service context. Further research across different service environments is needed to confirm the robustness of the results. The results are based on scenarios rather than real events. A longitudinal field study that examines consumer reaction at the point of service recovery and tracks actual subsequent behaviors is merited. Practical implications: The study's findings suggest that, when a severe service failure occurs, service firms should consider going beyond full compensation, offering the consumer an additional cash amount. However, more is not necessarily better - a small additional cash amount may induce similar perceptions of fairness to larger amounts. Originality/value: This study yields insights into the perceptions of distributive justice associated with different amounts and forms of overcompensation for severe service failure, and demonstrates the mediating effect of perceived distributive justice in the overcompensation-NWOM intent relationship.

AB - Purpose: This study aims to examine the perceived fairness of overcompensation for severe service failures. The mediating effect of perceived fairness in the overcompensation-negative word-of-mouth (NWOM) intent relationship is also explored. Design/methodology/approach: An experimental design approach was utilized to test the study's hypotheses. Overcompensation amount was manipulated at three levels (50 percent, 100 percent, 200 percent of purchase price), with two forms of overcompensation (cash or credit) tested. Findings: Cash-based overcompensation yielded higher perceptions of distributive justice than full compensation, with no significant difference in distributive justice perceptions across cash amounts. Credit-based overcompensation was perceived as no fairer than full compensation. Perceived distributive justice fully mediates the overcompensation-NWOM intent relationship. Research limitations/implications: The study's findings are based on a single service context. Further research across different service environments is needed to confirm the robustness of the results. The results are based on scenarios rather than real events. A longitudinal field study that examines consumer reaction at the point of service recovery and tracks actual subsequent behaviors is merited. Practical implications: The study's findings suggest that, when a severe service failure occurs, service firms should consider going beyond full compensation, offering the consumer an additional cash amount. However, more is not necessarily better - a small additional cash amount may induce similar perceptions of fairness to larger amounts. Originality/value: This study yields insights into the perceptions of distributive justice associated with different amounts and forms of overcompensation for severe service failure, and demonstrates the mediating effect of perceived distributive justice in the overcompensation-NWOM intent relationship.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864449050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864449050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/08876041211245254

DO - 10.1108/08876041211245254

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84864449050

VL - 26

SP - 342

EP - 351

JO - Journal of Services Marketing

JF - Journal of Services Marketing

SN - 0887-6045

IS - 5

ER -