Overconfident competing newsvendors

Meng Li, Nicholas C. Petruzzi, Jun Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Overconfidence is one of the most consistent, powerful, and widespread cognitive biases affecting decision making in situations characterized by random outcomes. In this paper, we study the effects and implications of overconfidence in a competitive newsvendor setting. In this context, overconfidence is defined as a cognitive bias in which decision makers behave as though the outcome of an uncertain event is less risky than it really is. This bias unequivocally leads to a lower expected profit for a newsvendor that does not compete on inventory availability. Nevertheless, it can be a positive force for competing newsvendors. Indeed, we find that when the product's profit margin is high, overconfidence can lead to a first-best outcome. In a similar vein, we also show that the more biased of two competing newsvendors is not necessarily destined to a smaller expected profit than its less biased competitor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2637-2646
Number of pages10
JournalManagement Science
Volume63
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Newsvendor
Overconfidence
Profit
Cognitive bias
Competitors
Decision maker
Decision making
Profit margin

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

Li, Meng ; Petruzzi, Nicholas C. ; Zhang, Jun. / Overconfident competing newsvendors. In: Management Science. 2017 ; Vol. 63, No. 8. pp. 2637-2646.
@article{e8850be8bd084366b0f2de1b6d13fba5,
title = "Overconfident competing newsvendors",
abstract = "Overconfidence is one of the most consistent, powerful, and widespread cognitive biases affecting decision making in situations characterized by random outcomes. In this paper, we study the effects and implications of overconfidence in a competitive newsvendor setting. In this context, overconfidence is defined as a cognitive bias in which decision makers behave as though the outcome of an uncertain event is less risky than it really is. This bias unequivocally leads to a lower expected profit for a newsvendor that does not compete on inventory availability. Nevertheless, it can be a positive force for competing newsvendors. Indeed, we find that when the product's profit margin is high, overconfidence can lead to a first-best outcome. In a similar vein, we also show that the more biased of two competing newsvendors is not necessarily destined to a smaller expected profit than its less biased competitor.",
author = "Meng Li and Petruzzi, {Nicholas C.} and Jun Zhang",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1287/mnsc.2016.2469",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "2637--2646",
journal = "Management Science",
issn = "0025-1909",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "8",

}

Overconfident competing newsvendors. / Li, Meng; Petruzzi, Nicholas C.; Zhang, Jun.

In: Management Science, Vol. 63, No. 8, 01.08.2017, p. 2637-2646.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Overconfident competing newsvendors

AU - Li, Meng

AU - Petruzzi, Nicholas C.

AU - Zhang, Jun

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Overconfidence is one of the most consistent, powerful, and widespread cognitive biases affecting decision making in situations characterized by random outcomes. In this paper, we study the effects and implications of overconfidence in a competitive newsvendor setting. In this context, overconfidence is defined as a cognitive bias in which decision makers behave as though the outcome of an uncertain event is less risky than it really is. This bias unequivocally leads to a lower expected profit for a newsvendor that does not compete on inventory availability. Nevertheless, it can be a positive force for competing newsvendors. Indeed, we find that when the product's profit margin is high, overconfidence can lead to a first-best outcome. In a similar vein, we also show that the more biased of two competing newsvendors is not necessarily destined to a smaller expected profit than its less biased competitor.

AB - Overconfidence is one of the most consistent, powerful, and widespread cognitive biases affecting decision making in situations characterized by random outcomes. In this paper, we study the effects and implications of overconfidence in a competitive newsvendor setting. In this context, overconfidence is defined as a cognitive bias in which decision makers behave as though the outcome of an uncertain event is less risky than it really is. This bias unequivocally leads to a lower expected profit for a newsvendor that does not compete on inventory availability. Nevertheless, it can be a positive force for competing newsvendors. Indeed, we find that when the product's profit margin is high, overconfidence can lead to a first-best outcome. In a similar vein, we also show that the more biased of two competing newsvendors is not necessarily destined to a smaller expected profit than its less biased competitor.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027321739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027321739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2469

DO - 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2469

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 2637

EP - 2646

JO - Management Science

JF - Management Science

SN - 0025-1909

IS - 8

ER -