Overt attempts to change hand preference: a study of group and individual characteristics.

Clare Kathleen Porac, T. Buller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous work by Porac, Coren, and Searleman (1986) looked at overt attempts to change hand preference from the left to the right side. We extended this research by studying individuals who shifted their handedness from the left to the right side as well as a group who attempted a shift in the opposite direction (right to left). Comparisons of the two shift attempts revealed that the timing, method, and agent of change differed significantly for right versus left shifts. More right than left shifts were successful. Overall, most shift attempts were rated as unsuccessful because they did not result in a handedness classification consistent with the direction of the shift. Individuals classified as successful shifters, whether in the right or left direction, displayed a more ambihanded behavioural pattern than either unsuccessful shifters or the no shift control group. Evidence suggested that left-shift attempts were promoted by original ambihanded tendencies but that ambihandedness in successful right shifts stemmed from the partial success of the switch attempt.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)512-521
Number of pages10
JournalCanadian journal of psychology
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1990

Fingerprint

Functional Laterality
Hand
Control Groups
Research
Direction compound

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{eb62c7aa5de546d4916115b505facc40,
title = "Overt attempts to change hand preference: a study of group and individual characteristics.",
abstract = "Previous work by Porac, Coren, and Searleman (1986) looked at overt attempts to change hand preference from the left to the right side. We extended this research by studying individuals who shifted their handedness from the left to the right side as well as a group who attempted a shift in the opposite direction (right to left). Comparisons of the two shift attempts revealed that the timing, method, and agent of change differed significantly for right versus left shifts. More right than left shifts were successful. Overall, most shift attempts were rated as unsuccessful because they did not result in a handedness classification consistent with the direction of the shift. Individuals classified as successful shifters, whether in the right or left direction, displayed a more ambihanded behavioural pattern than either unsuccessful shifters or the no shift control group. Evidence suggested that left-shift attempts were promoted by original ambihanded tendencies but that ambihandedness in successful right shifts stemmed from the partial success of the switch attempt.",
author = "Porac, {Clare Kathleen} and T. Buller",
year = "1990",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/h0084268",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "512--521",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology",
issn = "1196-1961",
publisher = "Canadian Psychological Association",
number = "4",

}

Overt attempts to change hand preference : a study of group and individual characteristics. / Porac, Clare Kathleen; Buller, T.

In: Canadian journal of psychology, Vol. 44, No. 4, 01.01.1990, p. 512-521.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Overt attempts to change hand preference

T2 - a study of group and individual characteristics.

AU - Porac, Clare Kathleen

AU - Buller, T.

PY - 1990/1/1

Y1 - 1990/1/1

N2 - Previous work by Porac, Coren, and Searleman (1986) looked at overt attempts to change hand preference from the left to the right side. We extended this research by studying individuals who shifted their handedness from the left to the right side as well as a group who attempted a shift in the opposite direction (right to left). Comparisons of the two shift attempts revealed that the timing, method, and agent of change differed significantly for right versus left shifts. More right than left shifts were successful. Overall, most shift attempts were rated as unsuccessful because they did not result in a handedness classification consistent with the direction of the shift. Individuals classified as successful shifters, whether in the right or left direction, displayed a more ambihanded behavioural pattern than either unsuccessful shifters or the no shift control group. Evidence suggested that left-shift attempts were promoted by original ambihanded tendencies but that ambihandedness in successful right shifts stemmed from the partial success of the switch attempt.

AB - Previous work by Porac, Coren, and Searleman (1986) looked at overt attempts to change hand preference from the left to the right side. We extended this research by studying individuals who shifted their handedness from the left to the right side as well as a group who attempted a shift in the opposite direction (right to left). Comparisons of the two shift attempts revealed that the timing, method, and agent of change differed significantly for right versus left shifts. More right than left shifts were successful. Overall, most shift attempts were rated as unsuccessful because they did not result in a handedness classification consistent with the direction of the shift. Individuals classified as successful shifters, whether in the right or left direction, displayed a more ambihanded behavioural pattern than either unsuccessful shifters or the no shift control group. Evidence suggested that left-shift attempts were promoted by original ambihanded tendencies but that ambihandedness in successful right shifts stemmed from the partial success of the switch attempt.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025616870&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025616870&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/h0084268

DO - 10.1037/h0084268

M3 - Article

C2 - 2292088

AN - SCOPUS:0025616870

VL - 44

SP - 512

EP - 521

JO - Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

JF - Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

SN - 1196-1961

IS - 4

ER -