Pair of techniques for effective interface evaluation

Cognitive walkthroughs and think-aloud evaluations

Tyra Beer, Tatyana Anodenko, Andrew L. Sears

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Developing effective user interfaces is an iterative process. Early evaluations tend to focus on finding severe problems that need to be fixed as early as possible. As the design evolves, attention shifts toward smaller details so less severe problems are also of interest. To succeed, it is important to apply the most effective evaluation techniques at each stage. In this paper, we explain why cognitive walkthrough and think-aloud evaluations complement each other and report the results of a study that compares these techniques for use late in the development process. Our study shows that cognitive walkthroughs find the most severe usability problems along with desirable new features and functionality, while think-aloud evaluations find all types of usability problems. This paper adds to our understanding of interface evaluation techniques and provides practical advice for developers searching for techniques that are effective throughout the development process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)380-384
Number of pages5
JournalProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Volume1
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

User interfaces
evaluation
user interface
functionality

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

@article{dc3b9f1cfecb48aeac39f3a803d1314e,
title = "Pair of techniques for effective interface evaluation: Cognitive walkthroughs and think-aloud evaluations",
abstract = "Developing effective user interfaces is an iterative process. Early evaluations tend to focus on finding severe problems that need to be fixed as early as possible. As the design evolves, attention shifts toward smaller details so less severe problems are also of interest. To succeed, it is important to apply the most effective evaluation techniques at each stage. In this paper, we explain why cognitive walkthrough and think-aloud evaluations complement each other and report the results of a study that compares these techniques for use late in the development process. Our study shows that cognitive walkthroughs find the most severe usability problems along with desirable new features and functionality, while think-aloud evaluations find all types of usability problems. This paper adds to our understanding of interface evaluation techniques and provides practical advice for developers searching for techniques that are effective throughout the development process.",
author = "Tyra Beer and Tatyana Anodenko and Sears, {Andrew L.}",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "380--384",
journal = "Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society",
issn = "1071-1813",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pair of techniques for effective interface evaluation

T2 - Cognitive walkthroughs and think-aloud evaluations

AU - Beer, Tyra

AU - Anodenko, Tatyana

AU - Sears, Andrew L.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Developing effective user interfaces is an iterative process. Early evaluations tend to focus on finding severe problems that need to be fixed as early as possible. As the design evolves, attention shifts toward smaller details so less severe problems are also of interest. To succeed, it is important to apply the most effective evaluation techniques at each stage. In this paper, we explain why cognitive walkthrough and think-aloud evaluations complement each other and report the results of a study that compares these techniques for use late in the development process. Our study shows that cognitive walkthroughs find the most severe usability problems along with desirable new features and functionality, while think-aloud evaluations find all types of usability problems. This paper adds to our understanding of interface evaluation techniques and provides practical advice for developers searching for techniques that are effective throughout the development process.

AB - Developing effective user interfaces is an iterative process. Early evaluations tend to focus on finding severe problems that need to be fixed as early as possible. As the design evolves, attention shifts toward smaller details so less severe problems are also of interest. To succeed, it is important to apply the most effective evaluation techniques at each stage. In this paper, we explain why cognitive walkthrough and think-aloud evaluations complement each other and report the results of a study that compares these techniques for use late in the development process. Our study shows that cognitive walkthroughs find the most severe usability problems along with desirable new features and functionality, while think-aloud evaluations find all types of usability problems. This paper adds to our understanding of interface evaluation techniques and provides practical advice for developers searching for techniques that are effective throughout the development process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031338771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031338771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 380

EP - 384

JO - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

JF - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

SN - 1071-1813

ER -