Paleoecology of Fort Ternan reconsidered

Patty Lee Shipman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Middle Miocene site of Fort Ternan is of unusual interest to paleoanthropologists because the fauna includes hominoid species and because the assemblage is an excellent subject for paleoecological reconstruction. Despite this, recent researchers (Andrews & Nesbit Evans, Pickford, and Shipman) have reached widely different conclusions about the habitat(s) sampled by the Fort Ternan fauna; their reconstructions run the gamut from open to closed habitats. These recent studies are here reviewed: their methodologies are evaluated and possible sources of error identified. It is concluded that the most probable interpretation is that the Fort Ternan paleoenvironment was predominantly open country, with a forested area nearby but at sufficient distance to be poorly represented in the fauna.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)193-204
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Human Evolution
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1986

Fingerprint

paleoecology
habitat
reconstruction
fauna
Hominidae
habitats
paleoenvironment
interpretation
methodology
researchers
Miocene
Palaeoecology
Fauna
Habitat

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Anthropology

Cite this

Shipman, Patty Lee. / Paleoecology of Fort Ternan reconsidered. In: Journal of Human Evolution. 1986 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 193-204.
@article{32b5b77d04184dea82868ce62a9c1b9a,
title = "Paleoecology of Fort Ternan reconsidered",
abstract = "The Middle Miocene site of Fort Ternan is of unusual interest to paleoanthropologists because the fauna includes hominoid species and because the assemblage is an excellent subject for paleoecological reconstruction. Despite this, recent researchers (Andrews & Nesbit Evans, Pickford, and Shipman) have reached widely different conclusions about the habitat(s) sampled by the Fort Ternan fauna; their reconstructions run the gamut from open to closed habitats. These recent studies are here reviewed: their methodologies are evaluated and possible sources of error identified. It is concluded that the most probable interpretation is that the Fort Ternan paleoenvironment was predominantly open country, with a forested area nearby but at sufficient distance to be poorly represented in the fauna.",
author = "Shipman, {Patty Lee}",
year = "1986",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0047-2484(86)80045-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "193--204",
journal = "Journal of Human Evolution",
issn = "0047-2484",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Paleoecology of Fort Ternan reconsidered. / Shipman, Patty Lee.

In: Journal of Human Evolution, Vol. 15, No. 3, 01.01.1986, p. 193-204.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paleoecology of Fort Ternan reconsidered

AU - Shipman, Patty Lee

PY - 1986/1/1

Y1 - 1986/1/1

N2 - The Middle Miocene site of Fort Ternan is of unusual interest to paleoanthropologists because the fauna includes hominoid species and because the assemblage is an excellent subject for paleoecological reconstruction. Despite this, recent researchers (Andrews & Nesbit Evans, Pickford, and Shipman) have reached widely different conclusions about the habitat(s) sampled by the Fort Ternan fauna; their reconstructions run the gamut from open to closed habitats. These recent studies are here reviewed: their methodologies are evaluated and possible sources of error identified. It is concluded that the most probable interpretation is that the Fort Ternan paleoenvironment was predominantly open country, with a forested area nearby but at sufficient distance to be poorly represented in the fauna.

AB - The Middle Miocene site of Fort Ternan is of unusual interest to paleoanthropologists because the fauna includes hominoid species and because the assemblage is an excellent subject for paleoecological reconstruction. Despite this, recent researchers (Andrews & Nesbit Evans, Pickford, and Shipman) have reached widely different conclusions about the habitat(s) sampled by the Fort Ternan fauna; their reconstructions run the gamut from open to closed habitats. These recent studies are here reviewed: their methodologies are evaluated and possible sources of error identified. It is concluded that the most probable interpretation is that the Fort Ternan paleoenvironment was predominantly open country, with a forested area nearby but at sufficient distance to be poorly represented in the fauna.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000631485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000631485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0047-2484(86)80045-8

DO - 10.1016/S0047-2484(86)80045-8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0000631485

VL - 15

SP - 193

EP - 204

JO - Journal of Human Evolution

JF - Journal of Human Evolution

SN - 0047-2484

IS - 3

ER -