Papers of note: Testing the fidelity of climate reconstruction methods

Michael Mann, S. Rutherford, E. Wahl, C. Ammann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Climate Field Reconstruction (CFR) method and the "compsite-plus-scale" (CPS) method were tested using a simulation of the climate of the past millenium (AD 850-1999) employing the NCAR Climate System Model 1.4 coupled ocean-atmosphere model driven by estimated long-term natural and anthropogenic radiative forcing histories. It was found that both methods are likely to provide a faithful estimate of actual long-term hemispheric temperature histories, within estimated uncertainties.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)166-167
Number of pages2
JournalBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Volume87
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1 2006

Fingerprint

climate
radiative forcing
history
atmosphere
ocean
simulation
method
temperature

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

@article{52bc70b08c314dd8a8ed6e4cd534b551,
title = "Papers of note: Testing the fidelity of climate reconstruction methods",
abstract = "The Climate Field Reconstruction (CFR) method and the {"}compsite-plus-scale{"} (CPS) method were tested using a simulation of the climate of the past millenium (AD 850-1999) employing the NCAR Climate System Model 1.4 coupled ocean-atmosphere model driven by estimated long-term natural and anthropogenic radiative forcing histories. It was found that both methods are likely to provide a faithful estimate of actual long-term hemispheric temperature histories, within estimated uncertainties.",
author = "Michael Mann and S. Rutherford and E. Wahl and C. Ammann",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "166--167",
journal = "Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society",
issn = "0003-0007",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "2",

}

Papers of note : Testing the fidelity of climate reconstruction methods. / Mann, Michael; Rutherford, S.; Wahl, E.; Ammann, C.

In: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 87, No. 2, 01.02.2006, p. 166-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Papers of note

T2 - Testing the fidelity of climate reconstruction methods

AU - Mann, Michael

AU - Rutherford, S.

AU - Wahl, E.

AU - Ammann, C.

PY - 2006/2/1

Y1 - 2006/2/1

N2 - The Climate Field Reconstruction (CFR) method and the "compsite-plus-scale" (CPS) method were tested using a simulation of the climate of the past millenium (AD 850-1999) employing the NCAR Climate System Model 1.4 coupled ocean-atmosphere model driven by estimated long-term natural and anthropogenic radiative forcing histories. It was found that both methods are likely to provide a faithful estimate of actual long-term hemispheric temperature histories, within estimated uncertainties.

AB - The Climate Field Reconstruction (CFR) method and the "compsite-plus-scale" (CPS) method were tested using a simulation of the climate of the past millenium (AD 850-1999) employing the NCAR Climate System Model 1.4 coupled ocean-atmosphere model driven by estimated long-term natural and anthropogenic radiative forcing histories. It was found that both methods are likely to provide a faithful estimate of actual long-term hemispheric temperature histories, within estimated uncertainties.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645024505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645024505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33645024505

VL - 87

SP - 166

EP - 167

JO - Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

JF - Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

SN - 0003-0007

IS - 2

ER -