Paradigms and commonalities in atmospheric source term estimation methods

Paul E. Bieringer, George Spencer Young, Luna M. Rodriguez, Andrew J. Annunzio, Francois Vandenberghe, Sue Ellen Haupt

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Modeling the downwind hazard area resulting from the unknown release of an atmospheric contaminant requires estimation of the source characteristics of a localized source from concentration or dosage observations and use of this information to model the subsequent transport and dispersion of the contaminant. This source term estimation problem is mathematically challenging because airborne material concentration observations and wind data are typically sparse and the turbulent wind field chaotic. Methods for addressing this problem fall into three general categories: forward modeling, inverse modeling, and nonlinear optimization. Because numerous methods have been developed on various foundations, they often have a disparate nomenclature. This situation poses challenges to those facing a new source term estimation problem, particularly when selecting the best method for the problem at hand. There is, however, much commonality between many of these methods, especially within each category. Here we seek to address the difficulties encountered when selecting an STE method by providing a synthesis of the various methods that highlights commonalities, potential opportunities for component exchange, and lessons learned that can be applied across methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)102-112
Number of pages11
JournalAtmospheric Environment
Volume156
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

estimation method
pollutant
forward modeling
method
nomenclature
wind field
modeling

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Bieringer, P. E., Young, G. S., Rodriguez, L. M., Annunzio, A. J., Vandenberghe, F., & Haupt, S. E. (2017). Paradigms and commonalities in atmospheric source term estimation methods. Atmospheric Environment, 156, 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.011
Bieringer, Paul E. ; Young, George Spencer ; Rodriguez, Luna M. ; Annunzio, Andrew J. ; Vandenberghe, Francois ; Haupt, Sue Ellen. / Paradigms and commonalities in atmospheric source term estimation methods. In: Atmospheric Environment. 2017 ; Vol. 156. pp. 102-112.
@article{4161f2adb6494040861c4761b98dc674,
title = "Paradigms and commonalities in atmospheric source term estimation methods",
abstract = "Modeling the downwind hazard area resulting from the unknown release of an atmospheric contaminant requires estimation of the source characteristics of a localized source from concentration or dosage observations and use of this information to model the subsequent transport and dispersion of the contaminant. This source term estimation problem is mathematically challenging because airborne material concentration observations and wind data are typically sparse and the turbulent wind field chaotic. Methods for addressing this problem fall into three general categories: forward modeling, inverse modeling, and nonlinear optimization. Because numerous methods have been developed on various foundations, they often have a disparate nomenclature. This situation poses challenges to those facing a new source term estimation problem, particularly when selecting the best method for the problem at hand. There is, however, much commonality between many of these methods, especially within each category. Here we seek to address the difficulties encountered when selecting an STE method by providing a synthesis of the various methods that highlights commonalities, potential opportunities for component exchange, and lessons learned that can be applied across methods.",
author = "Bieringer, {Paul E.} and Young, {George Spencer} and Rodriguez, {Luna M.} and Annunzio, {Andrew J.} and Francois Vandenberghe and Haupt, {Sue Ellen}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "156",
pages = "102--112",
journal = "Atmospheric Environment",
issn = "1352-2310",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Bieringer, PE, Young, GS, Rodriguez, LM, Annunzio, AJ, Vandenberghe, F & Haupt, SE 2017, 'Paradigms and commonalities in atmospheric source term estimation methods', Atmospheric Environment, vol. 156, pp. 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.011

Paradigms and commonalities in atmospheric source term estimation methods. / Bieringer, Paul E.; Young, George Spencer; Rodriguez, Luna M.; Annunzio, Andrew J.; Vandenberghe, Francois; Haupt, Sue Ellen.

In: Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 156, 01.01.2017, p. 102-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paradigms and commonalities in atmospheric source term estimation methods

AU - Bieringer, Paul E.

AU - Young, George Spencer

AU - Rodriguez, Luna M.

AU - Annunzio, Andrew J.

AU - Vandenberghe, Francois

AU - Haupt, Sue Ellen

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Modeling the downwind hazard area resulting from the unknown release of an atmospheric contaminant requires estimation of the source characteristics of a localized source from concentration or dosage observations and use of this information to model the subsequent transport and dispersion of the contaminant. This source term estimation problem is mathematically challenging because airborne material concentration observations and wind data are typically sparse and the turbulent wind field chaotic. Methods for addressing this problem fall into three general categories: forward modeling, inverse modeling, and nonlinear optimization. Because numerous methods have been developed on various foundations, they often have a disparate nomenclature. This situation poses challenges to those facing a new source term estimation problem, particularly when selecting the best method for the problem at hand. There is, however, much commonality between many of these methods, especially within each category. Here we seek to address the difficulties encountered when selecting an STE method by providing a synthesis of the various methods that highlights commonalities, potential opportunities for component exchange, and lessons learned that can be applied across methods.

AB - Modeling the downwind hazard area resulting from the unknown release of an atmospheric contaminant requires estimation of the source characteristics of a localized source from concentration or dosage observations and use of this information to model the subsequent transport and dispersion of the contaminant. This source term estimation problem is mathematically challenging because airborne material concentration observations and wind data are typically sparse and the turbulent wind field chaotic. Methods for addressing this problem fall into three general categories: forward modeling, inverse modeling, and nonlinear optimization. Because numerous methods have been developed on various foundations, they often have a disparate nomenclature. This situation poses challenges to those facing a new source term estimation problem, particularly when selecting the best method for the problem at hand. There is, however, much commonality between many of these methods, especially within each category. Here we seek to address the difficulties encountered when selecting an STE method by providing a synthesis of the various methods that highlights commonalities, potential opportunities for component exchange, and lessons learned that can be applied across methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014327772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014327772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.011

DO - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.011

M3 - Review article

VL - 156

SP - 102

EP - 112

JO - Atmospheric Environment

JF - Atmospheric Environment

SN - 1352-2310

ER -