Paradoxes of Leading Innovative Endeavors: Summary, Solutions, and Future Directions

Samuel Todd Hunter, Christian N. Thoroughgood, Adam T. Myer, Gina Scott Ligon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Leading innovative pursuits requires a unique set of leadership behaviors-behaviors that are frequently at odds with traditional forms of management and organizational functioning. We have identified 14 of these tensions, or paradoxes, associated with leading innovative endeavors categorizing them into four clusters: internal/localized, team-level, organization-level, and situational. In addition, we consider some industry-derived solutions to these paradoxes, revealing how some highly innovative organizations have been able to successfully manage these tensions. Supplementing these solutions, we offer suggestions on how organizations might approach those remaining paradoxes, concluding with a discussion on necessary future research endeavors. Finally, we argue that the pursuit of innovation requires a unique leadership approach-one that may not be currently captured by traditional views of leadership.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)54-66
Number of pages13
JournalPsychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2011

Fingerprint

Industry
Summary
Paradox
Direction compound
Pursuit
Situational
Innovation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Hunter, Samuel Todd ; Thoroughgood, Christian N. ; Myer, Adam T. ; Ligon, Gina Scott. / Paradoxes of Leading Innovative Endeavors : Summary, Solutions, and Future Directions. In: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2011 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 54-66.
@article{43ebc21b19eb4bc4bc920edcdff0ca33,
title = "Paradoxes of Leading Innovative Endeavors: Summary, Solutions, and Future Directions",
abstract = "Leading innovative pursuits requires a unique set of leadership behaviors-behaviors that are frequently at odds with traditional forms of management and organizational functioning. We have identified 14 of these tensions, or paradoxes, associated with leading innovative endeavors categorizing them into four clusters: internal/localized, team-level, organization-level, and situational. In addition, we consider some industry-derived solutions to these paradoxes, revealing how some highly innovative organizations have been able to successfully manage these tensions. Supplementing these solutions, we offer suggestions on how organizations might approach those remaining paradoxes, concluding with a discussion on necessary future research endeavors. Finally, we argue that the pursuit of innovation requires a unique leadership approach-one that may not be currently captured by traditional views of leadership.",
author = "Hunter, {Samuel Todd} and Thoroughgood, {Christian N.} and Myer, {Adam T.} and Ligon, {Gina Scott}",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0017776",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "54--66",
journal = "Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts",
issn = "1931-3896",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Paradoxes of Leading Innovative Endeavors : Summary, Solutions, and Future Directions. / Hunter, Samuel Todd; Thoroughgood, Christian N.; Myer, Adam T.; Ligon, Gina Scott.

In: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.02.2011, p. 54-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paradoxes of Leading Innovative Endeavors

T2 - Summary, Solutions, and Future Directions

AU - Hunter, Samuel Todd

AU - Thoroughgood, Christian N.

AU - Myer, Adam T.

AU - Ligon, Gina Scott

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - Leading innovative pursuits requires a unique set of leadership behaviors-behaviors that are frequently at odds with traditional forms of management and organizational functioning. We have identified 14 of these tensions, or paradoxes, associated with leading innovative endeavors categorizing them into four clusters: internal/localized, team-level, organization-level, and situational. In addition, we consider some industry-derived solutions to these paradoxes, revealing how some highly innovative organizations have been able to successfully manage these tensions. Supplementing these solutions, we offer suggestions on how organizations might approach those remaining paradoxes, concluding with a discussion on necessary future research endeavors. Finally, we argue that the pursuit of innovation requires a unique leadership approach-one that may not be currently captured by traditional views of leadership.

AB - Leading innovative pursuits requires a unique set of leadership behaviors-behaviors that are frequently at odds with traditional forms of management and organizational functioning. We have identified 14 of these tensions, or paradoxes, associated with leading innovative endeavors categorizing them into four clusters: internal/localized, team-level, organization-level, and situational. In addition, we consider some industry-derived solutions to these paradoxes, revealing how some highly innovative organizations have been able to successfully manage these tensions. Supplementing these solutions, we offer suggestions on how organizations might approach those remaining paradoxes, concluding with a discussion on necessary future research endeavors. Finally, we argue that the pursuit of innovation requires a unique leadership approach-one that may not be currently captured by traditional views of leadership.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952997809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952997809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0017776

DO - 10.1037/a0017776

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79952997809

VL - 5

SP - 54

EP - 66

JO - Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

JF - Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

SN - 1931-3896

IS - 1

ER -