Paths of Resistance: An Interpretive Analysis of Trajectories in Less Satisfying Advice Interactions

Erina L. MacGeorge, Lisa M. Guntzviller, Sara E. Branch, Liliya Yakova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Social scientists and conversation analysts have both focused on advice as a key form of support and influence, but neither have adequately connected patterns of verbal behavior in advice interactions to recipients’ reduced satisfaction with advice. We address this concern with an interpretive discourse analysis of naturalistic “troubles talk” between college student friends. Transcripts (N = 48) were selected for analysis from a larger study of supportive interactions because the recipients in these interactions reported the advice as less satisfying on one or more dimensions, relative to the other advice recipients in the study. Our analysis explicates four trajectories of advice and resistance that characterize these interactions: sustained resistance, advisor persistence, irrational resistance, and contesting the problem. We discuss theoretical and pragmatic implications of these trajectories, including probable influences of the “friend” role on advising interactions, and the responsibility of both a...
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)548-568
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Language and Social Psychology
Volume35
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Verbal Behavior
interaction
recipient
Students
language behavior
social scientist
discourse analysis
persistence
pragmatics
conversation
Trajectory
Interaction
responsibility
Recipient
student

Cite this

@article{1f440e7001fe49a4b95d41cb6d41c405,
title = "Paths of Resistance: An Interpretive Analysis of Trajectories in Less Satisfying Advice Interactions",
abstract = "Social scientists and conversation analysts have both focused on advice as a key form of support and influence, but neither have adequately connected patterns of verbal behavior in advice interactions to recipients’ reduced satisfaction with advice. We address this concern with an interpretive discourse analysis of naturalistic “troubles talk” between college student friends. Transcripts (N = 48) were selected for analysis from a larger study of supportive interactions because the recipients in these interactions reported the advice as less satisfying on one or more dimensions, relative to the other advice recipients in the study. Our analysis explicates four trajectories of advice and resistance that characterize these interactions: sustained resistance, advisor persistence, irrational resistance, and contesting the problem. We discuss theoretical and pragmatic implications of these trajectories, including probable influences of the “friend” role on advising interactions, and the responsibility of both a...",
author = "MacGeorge, {Erina L.} and Guntzviller, {Lisa M.} and Branch, {Sara E.} and Liliya Yakova",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0261927X15611920",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "548--568",
journal = "Journal of Language and Social Psychology",
issn = "0261-927X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Paths of Resistance: An Interpretive Analysis of Trajectories in Less Satisfying Advice Interactions. / MacGeorge, Erina L.; Guntzviller, Lisa M.; Branch, Sara E.; Yakova, Liliya.

In: Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 35, No. 5, 01.10.2016, p. 548-568.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paths of Resistance: An Interpretive Analysis of Trajectories in Less Satisfying Advice Interactions

AU - MacGeorge, Erina L.

AU - Guntzviller, Lisa M.

AU - Branch, Sara E.

AU - Yakova, Liliya

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Social scientists and conversation analysts have both focused on advice as a key form of support and influence, but neither have adequately connected patterns of verbal behavior in advice interactions to recipients’ reduced satisfaction with advice. We address this concern with an interpretive discourse analysis of naturalistic “troubles talk” between college student friends. Transcripts (N = 48) were selected for analysis from a larger study of supportive interactions because the recipients in these interactions reported the advice as less satisfying on one or more dimensions, relative to the other advice recipients in the study. Our analysis explicates four trajectories of advice and resistance that characterize these interactions: sustained resistance, advisor persistence, irrational resistance, and contesting the problem. We discuss theoretical and pragmatic implications of these trajectories, including probable influences of the “friend” role on advising interactions, and the responsibility of both a...

AB - Social scientists and conversation analysts have both focused on advice as a key form of support and influence, but neither have adequately connected patterns of verbal behavior in advice interactions to recipients’ reduced satisfaction with advice. We address this concern with an interpretive discourse analysis of naturalistic “troubles talk” between college student friends. Transcripts (N = 48) were selected for analysis from a larger study of supportive interactions because the recipients in these interactions reported the advice as less satisfying on one or more dimensions, relative to the other advice recipients in the study. Our analysis explicates four trajectories of advice and resistance that characterize these interactions: sustained resistance, advisor persistence, irrational resistance, and contesting the problem. We discuss theoretical and pragmatic implications of these trajectories, including probable influences of the “friend” role on advising interactions, and the responsibility of both a...

U2 - 10.1177/0261927X15611920

DO - 10.1177/0261927X15611920

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 548

EP - 568

JO - Journal of Language and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Language and Social Psychology

SN - 0261-927X

IS - 5

ER -