Patient selection and preoperative evaluation for fecal incontinence

Nimalan Jeganathan, Joshua I.S. Bleier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Patient selection and preoperative evaluation play a vital role in the application of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) to fecal incontinence (FI). The history and physical should elucidate the nature of the incontinence, including duration, severity, type of leakage, as well as associated pathology (e.g., urinary incontinence, prolapse, etc.). Additionally, the use of a validated incontinence scoring system in obtaining an objective measure is recommended as a way to monitor an individual patient's response to treatment over time. Despite dramatic success with SNM for severe incontinence, medical therapies should remain first-line treatment, especially for mild to moderate FI. In addition to idiopathic causes of FI, small series have reported successes in patients with disrupted anal sphincters, spinal cord injury, rectal prolapse, and low anterior resection syndrome. In general, studies on sacral neuromodulation have failed to identify consistent predictors correlating with response to treatment. Two considerations unique to SNM, cardiac pacemakers and anomalous anatomy, are not absolute contraindications but do mandate thorough preoperative planning and counseling.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)160-163
Number of pages4
JournalSeminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Fecal Incontinence
Patient Selection
Rectal Prolapse
Prolapse
Urinary Incontinence
Anal Canal
Therapeutics
Spinal Cord Injuries
Counseling
Anatomy
History
Pathology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

@article{42e1a1bbd35b437397d7831843162731,
title = "Patient selection and preoperative evaluation for fecal incontinence",
abstract = "Patient selection and preoperative evaluation play a vital role in the application of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) to fecal incontinence (FI). The history and physical should elucidate the nature of the incontinence, including duration, severity, type of leakage, as well as associated pathology (e.g., urinary incontinence, prolapse, etc.). Additionally, the use of a validated incontinence scoring system in obtaining an objective measure is recommended as a way to monitor an individual patient's response to treatment over time. Despite dramatic success with SNM for severe incontinence, medical therapies should remain first-line treatment, especially for mild to moderate FI. In addition to idiopathic causes of FI, small series have reported successes in patients with disrupted anal sphincters, spinal cord injury, rectal prolapse, and low anterior resection syndrome. In general, studies on sacral neuromodulation have failed to identify consistent predictors correlating with response to treatment. Two considerations unique to SNM, cardiac pacemakers and anomalous anatomy, are not absolute contraindications but do mandate thorough preoperative planning and counseling.",
author = "Nimalan Jeganathan and Bleier, {Joshua I.S.}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/j.scrs.2017.07.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "160--163",
journal = "Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery",
issn = "1043-1489",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Patient selection and preoperative evaluation for fecal incontinence. / Jeganathan, Nimalan; Bleier, Joshua I.S.

In: Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery, Vol. 28, No. 4, 01.12.2017, p. 160-163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient selection and preoperative evaluation for fecal incontinence

AU - Jeganathan, Nimalan

AU - Bleier, Joshua I.S.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Patient selection and preoperative evaluation play a vital role in the application of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) to fecal incontinence (FI). The history and physical should elucidate the nature of the incontinence, including duration, severity, type of leakage, as well as associated pathology (e.g., urinary incontinence, prolapse, etc.). Additionally, the use of a validated incontinence scoring system in obtaining an objective measure is recommended as a way to monitor an individual patient's response to treatment over time. Despite dramatic success with SNM for severe incontinence, medical therapies should remain first-line treatment, especially for mild to moderate FI. In addition to idiopathic causes of FI, small series have reported successes in patients with disrupted anal sphincters, spinal cord injury, rectal prolapse, and low anterior resection syndrome. In general, studies on sacral neuromodulation have failed to identify consistent predictors correlating with response to treatment. Two considerations unique to SNM, cardiac pacemakers and anomalous anatomy, are not absolute contraindications but do mandate thorough preoperative planning and counseling.

AB - Patient selection and preoperative evaluation play a vital role in the application of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) to fecal incontinence (FI). The history and physical should elucidate the nature of the incontinence, including duration, severity, type of leakage, as well as associated pathology (e.g., urinary incontinence, prolapse, etc.). Additionally, the use of a validated incontinence scoring system in obtaining an objective measure is recommended as a way to monitor an individual patient's response to treatment over time. Despite dramatic success with SNM for severe incontinence, medical therapies should remain first-line treatment, especially for mild to moderate FI. In addition to idiopathic causes of FI, small series have reported successes in patients with disrupted anal sphincters, spinal cord injury, rectal prolapse, and low anterior resection syndrome. In general, studies on sacral neuromodulation have failed to identify consistent predictors correlating with response to treatment. Two considerations unique to SNM, cardiac pacemakers and anomalous anatomy, are not absolute contraindications but do mandate thorough preoperative planning and counseling.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034054773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034054773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.scrs.2017.07.003

DO - 10.1053/j.scrs.2017.07.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85034054773

VL - 28

SP - 160

EP - 163

JO - Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery

JF - Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery

SN - 1043-1489

IS - 4

ER -