Patients’ experiences with routine outcome monitoring and clinical feedback systems

A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative empirical literature

Stig Magne Solstad, Louis Georges Castonguay, Christian Moltu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and clinical feedback (CF) systems have become important tools for psychological therapies, but there are challenges for their successful implementation. Objective: To overcome these challenges, a greater understanding is needed about how patients experience the use of ROM/CF. Method: We conducted a systematic literature search of qualitative studies on patient experiences with the use of ROM/CF in mental health services. Results: The findings from 16 studies were synthesized, resulting in four meta-themes: (1) Suspicion towards service providers, (2) Flexibility and support to capture complexity, (3) Empowering patients, and (4) Developing collaborative practice. Conclusions: We discuss the implications of these meta-themes for further development and implementation of ROM/CF into clinical practice, acknowledging the limitations of our review and suggesting avenues for further research. Clinical or methodological significance of this article: This article provides useful and actionable knowledge about the patient perspective on ROM/CF, an important discussion on the current state of research in this area, and useful and concrete suggestions for further avenues of research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)157-170
Number of pages14
JournalPsychotherapy Research
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 4 2019

Fingerprint

Research
Mental Health Services
Psychology
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

@article{a5badcf44c4c4ae6a042a27ce29cd236,
title = "Patients’ experiences with routine outcome monitoring and clinical feedback systems: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative empirical literature",
abstract = "Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and clinical feedback (CF) systems have become important tools for psychological therapies, but there are challenges for their successful implementation. Objective: To overcome these challenges, a greater understanding is needed about how patients experience the use of ROM/CF. Method: We conducted a systematic literature search of qualitative studies on patient experiences with the use of ROM/CF in mental health services. Results: The findings from 16 studies were synthesized, resulting in four meta-themes: (1) Suspicion towards service providers, (2) Flexibility and support to capture complexity, (3) Empowering patients, and (4) Developing collaborative practice. Conclusions: We discuss the implications of these meta-themes for further development and implementation of ROM/CF into clinical practice, acknowledging the limitations of our review and suggesting avenues for further research. Clinical or methodological significance of this article: This article provides useful and actionable knowledge about the patient perspective on ROM/CF, an important discussion on the current state of research in this area, and useful and concrete suggestions for further avenues of research.",
author = "Solstad, {Stig Magne} and Castonguay, {Louis Georges} and Christian Moltu",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/10503307.2017.1326645",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "157--170",
journal = "Psychotherapy Research",
issn = "1050-3307",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Patients’ experiences with routine outcome monitoring and clinical feedback systems : A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative empirical literature. / Solstad, Stig Magne; Castonguay, Louis Georges; Moltu, Christian.

In: Psychotherapy Research, Vol. 29, No. 2, 04.03.2019, p. 157-170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patients’ experiences with routine outcome monitoring and clinical feedback systems

T2 - A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative empirical literature

AU - Solstad, Stig Magne

AU - Castonguay, Louis Georges

AU - Moltu, Christian

PY - 2019/3/4

Y1 - 2019/3/4

N2 - Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and clinical feedback (CF) systems have become important tools for psychological therapies, but there are challenges for their successful implementation. Objective: To overcome these challenges, a greater understanding is needed about how patients experience the use of ROM/CF. Method: We conducted a systematic literature search of qualitative studies on patient experiences with the use of ROM/CF in mental health services. Results: The findings from 16 studies were synthesized, resulting in four meta-themes: (1) Suspicion towards service providers, (2) Flexibility and support to capture complexity, (3) Empowering patients, and (4) Developing collaborative practice. Conclusions: We discuss the implications of these meta-themes for further development and implementation of ROM/CF into clinical practice, acknowledging the limitations of our review and suggesting avenues for further research. Clinical or methodological significance of this article: This article provides useful and actionable knowledge about the patient perspective on ROM/CF, an important discussion on the current state of research in this area, and useful and concrete suggestions for further avenues of research.

AB - Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and clinical feedback (CF) systems have become important tools for psychological therapies, but there are challenges for their successful implementation. Objective: To overcome these challenges, a greater understanding is needed about how patients experience the use of ROM/CF. Method: We conducted a systematic literature search of qualitative studies on patient experiences with the use of ROM/CF in mental health services. Results: The findings from 16 studies were synthesized, resulting in four meta-themes: (1) Suspicion towards service providers, (2) Flexibility and support to capture complexity, (3) Empowering patients, and (4) Developing collaborative practice. Conclusions: We discuss the implications of these meta-themes for further development and implementation of ROM/CF into clinical practice, acknowledging the limitations of our review and suggesting avenues for further research. Clinical or methodological significance of this article: This article provides useful and actionable knowledge about the patient perspective on ROM/CF, an important discussion on the current state of research in this area, and useful and concrete suggestions for further avenues of research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019643675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019643675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10503307.2017.1326645

DO - 10.1080/10503307.2017.1326645

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 157

EP - 170

JO - Psychotherapy Research

JF - Psychotherapy Research

SN - 1050-3307

IS - 2

ER -