Pelvis Anatomy Tutorial Using Radiological Images

Madeleine J. Marsland, Dunya Tomic, Pamela L. Brian, Michelle D. Lazarus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Improving integration between basic science and clinical application is essential in medical education. Anatomy courses can do this by focusing on medical imaging interpretation. Most imaging textbooks rely on structural identification, which novice learners often struggle to apply to the health care environment, particularly in complex regions like the pelvis, which is multifaceted and differs substantially between sexes. To address this deficit, this resource extends our imaging-based tutorial series. Methods: This tutorial was a self-administered PowerPoint incorporating X-ray, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, which are all often used for the pelvic region, as well as self-quizzing and clinical applications. Using repeated-measures, control/experimental design, the tutorial was evaluated as a review tool for 57 Australian medical students in preclerkship years. Participants were evaluated by a rating self-efficacy scale, knowledge-based testing (multiple-choice, short-answer, and identification questions), and feedback to open-ended questions. Results: Results indicate that the tutorial significantly improved direct knowledge (p = .006), as the experimental group's posttutorial scores for direct questions were superior by 21% on average. Significant improvements occurred specifically for direct short-answer and indirect image-identification questions. Discussion: These results suggest the tutorial is an effective review tool. While previous tutorials were evaluated as adjunct tools, this tutorial was evaluated post-anatomy teaching with similar results. Students improved in direct and applied anatomy following tutorial exposure. This suggests that the tutorial series comprises valuable review and supplementary materials. None of our tutorials have been evaluated as a sole mechanism for teaching anatomy or imaging.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources
Volume14
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 28 2018

Fingerprint

Pelvis
Anatomy
Teaching
X Ray Computed Tomography
Textbooks
Self Efficacy
Diagnostic Imaging
Medical Education
Medical Students
Research Design
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Students
Delivery of Health Care
Identification (Psychology)

Cite this

Marsland, Madeleine J. ; Tomic, Dunya ; Brian, Pamela L. ; Lazarus, Michelle D. / Pelvis Anatomy Tutorial Using Radiological Images. In: MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources. 2018 ; Vol. 14.
@article{5fde9420ef0e4380a9f21f9da3f3bccb,
title = "Pelvis Anatomy Tutorial Using Radiological Images",
abstract = "Introduction: Improving integration between basic science and clinical application is essential in medical education. Anatomy courses can do this by focusing on medical imaging interpretation. Most imaging textbooks rely on structural identification, which novice learners often struggle to apply to the health care environment, particularly in complex regions like the pelvis, which is multifaceted and differs substantially between sexes. To address this deficit, this resource extends our imaging-based tutorial series. Methods: This tutorial was a self-administered PowerPoint incorporating X-ray, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, which are all often used for the pelvic region, as well as self-quizzing and clinical applications. Using repeated-measures, control/experimental design, the tutorial was evaluated as a review tool for 57 Australian medical students in preclerkship years. Participants were evaluated by a rating self-efficacy scale, knowledge-based testing (multiple-choice, short-answer, and identification questions), and feedback to open-ended questions. Results: Results indicate that the tutorial significantly improved direct knowledge (p = .006), as the experimental group's posttutorial scores for direct questions were superior by 21{\%} on average. Significant improvements occurred specifically for direct short-answer and indirect image-identification questions. Discussion: These results suggest the tutorial is an effective review tool. While previous tutorials were evaluated as adjunct tools, this tutorial was evaluated post-anatomy teaching with similar results. Students improved in direct and applied anatomy following tutorial exposure. This suggests that the tutorial series comprises valuable review and supplementary materials. None of our tutorials have been evaluated as a sole mechanism for teaching anatomy or imaging.",
author = "Marsland, {Madeleine J.} and Dunya Tomic and Brian, {Pamela L.} and Lazarus, {Michelle D.}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "28",
doi = "10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10778",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
journal = "MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources",
issn = "2374-8265",
publisher = "Association of American Medical Colleges",

}

Pelvis Anatomy Tutorial Using Radiological Images. / Marsland, Madeleine J.; Tomic, Dunya; Brian, Pamela L.; Lazarus, Michelle D.

In: MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, Vol. 14, 28.11.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pelvis Anatomy Tutorial Using Radiological Images

AU - Marsland, Madeleine J.

AU - Tomic, Dunya

AU - Brian, Pamela L.

AU - Lazarus, Michelle D.

PY - 2018/11/28

Y1 - 2018/11/28

N2 - Introduction: Improving integration between basic science and clinical application is essential in medical education. Anatomy courses can do this by focusing on medical imaging interpretation. Most imaging textbooks rely on structural identification, which novice learners often struggle to apply to the health care environment, particularly in complex regions like the pelvis, which is multifaceted and differs substantially between sexes. To address this deficit, this resource extends our imaging-based tutorial series. Methods: This tutorial was a self-administered PowerPoint incorporating X-ray, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, which are all often used for the pelvic region, as well as self-quizzing and clinical applications. Using repeated-measures, control/experimental design, the tutorial was evaluated as a review tool for 57 Australian medical students in preclerkship years. Participants were evaluated by a rating self-efficacy scale, knowledge-based testing (multiple-choice, short-answer, and identification questions), and feedback to open-ended questions. Results: Results indicate that the tutorial significantly improved direct knowledge (p = .006), as the experimental group's posttutorial scores for direct questions were superior by 21% on average. Significant improvements occurred specifically for direct short-answer and indirect image-identification questions. Discussion: These results suggest the tutorial is an effective review tool. While previous tutorials were evaluated as adjunct tools, this tutorial was evaluated post-anatomy teaching with similar results. Students improved in direct and applied anatomy following tutorial exposure. This suggests that the tutorial series comprises valuable review and supplementary materials. None of our tutorials have been evaluated as a sole mechanism for teaching anatomy or imaging.

AB - Introduction: Improving integration between basic science and clinical application is essential in medical education. Anatomy courses can do this by focusing on medical imaging interpretation. Most imaging textbooks rely on structural identification, which novice learners often struggle to apply to the health care environment, particularly in complex regions like the pelvis, which is multifaceted and differs substantially between sexes. To address this deficit, this resource extends our imaging-based tutorial series. Methods: This tutorial was a self-administered PowerPoint incorporating X-ray, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, which are all often used for the pelvic region, as well as self-quizzing and clinical applications. Using repeated-measures, control/experimental design, the tutorial was evaluated as a review tool for 57 Australian medical students in preclerkship years. Participants were evaluated by a rating self-efficacy scale, knowledge-based testing (multiple-choice, short-answer, and identification questions), and feedback to open-ended questions. Results: Results indicate that the tutorial significantly improved direct knowledge (p = .006), as the experimental group's posttutorial scores for direct questions were superior by 21% on average. Significant improvements occurred specifically for direct short-answer and indirect image-identification questions. Discussion: These results suggest the tutorial is an effective review tool. While previous tutorials were evaluated as adjunct tools, this tutorial was evaluated post-anatomy teaching with similar results. Students improved in direct and applied anatomy following tutorial exposure. This suggests that the tutorial series comprises valuable review and supplementary materials. None of our tutorials have been evaluated as a sole mechanism for teaching anatomy or imaging.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074379878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074379878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10778

DO - 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10778

M3 - Article

C2 - 30800978

AN - SCOPUS:85074379878

VL - 14

JO - MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources

JF - MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources

SN - 2374-8265

ER -