Pennsylvania SPS-6 Performance at 10 Years: Evaluation of Concrete Pavement Rehabilitation Strategies

Dennis A. Morian, Laura Coleman, Doug J. Frith, Shelley Marie Stoffels, Dan Dawood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With a long history of constructing jointed concrete pavements, Pennsylvania pursued the construction of Special Pavement Studies (SPS-6) sections for the rehabilitation of jointed concrete pavements experiment. After 10 years of service under very high loads on rural Interstate highways, a number of sections required renewal. The performances of the eight standard Strategic Highway Research Program sections, a control section, and three state supplemental sections were examined. The experiment included a broad range of treatments, including minimum and maximum concrete pavement restoration, the use of thin and thick overlays, and the use of crack or break and seat as well as rubblization as pretreatments for pavement overlays. Ten years after construction, many of the pavements that received the treatments are in need of major rehabilitation. This provides an opportune time to evaluate both the structural and functional performances of these test sections to date. Additionally, an evaluation of cost-effectiveness showed the importance of performing thorough evaluations of projects for rehabilitation and the potential benefit of rubblization of badly damaged jointed concrete pavements, a method used on the state supplemental sections, as a preoverlay strategy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)28-38
Number of pages11
JournalTransportation Research Record
Issue number1823
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Concrete pavements
Patient rehabilitation
Pavement overlays
Pavements
Highway systems
Cost effectiveness
Seats
Restoration
Experiments
History
Cracks

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

@article{4da676e224cf452891af14dbf6fbd32d,
title = "Pennsylvania SPS-6 Performance at 10 Years: Evaluation of Concrete Pavement Rehabilitation Strategies",
abstract = "With a long history of constructing jointed concrete pavements, Pennsylvania pursued the construction of Special Pavement Studies (SPS-6) sections for the rehabilitation of jointed concrete pavements experiment. After 10 years of service under very high loads on rural Interstate highways, a number of sections required renewal. The performances of the eight standard Strategic Highway Research Program sections, a control section, and three state supplemental sections were examined. The experiment included a broad range of treatments, including minimum and maximum concrete pavement restoration, the use of thin and thick overlays, and the use of crack or break and seat as well as rubblization as pretreatments for pavement overlays. Ten years after construction, many of the pavements that received the treatments are in need of major rehabilitation. This provides an opportune time to evaluate both the structural and functional performances of these test sections to date. Additionally, an evaluation of cost-effectiveness showed the importance of performing thorough evaluations of projects for rehabilitation and the potential benefit of rubblization of badly damaged jointed concrete pavements, a method used on the state supplemental sections, as a preoverlay strategy.",
author = "Morian, {Dennis A.} and Laura Coleman and Frith, {Doug J.} and Stoffels, {Shelley Marie} and Dan Dawood",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3141/1823-04",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "28--38",
journal = "Transportation Research Record",
issn = "0361-1981",
publisher = "US National Research Council",
number = "1823",

}

Pennsylvania SPS-6 Performance at 10 Years : Evaluation of Concrete Pavement Rehabilitation Strategies. / Morian, Dennis A.; Coleman, Laura; Frith, Doug J.; Stoffels, Shelley Marie; Dawood, Dan.

In: Transportation Research Record, No. 1823, 01.01.2003, p. 28-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pennsylvania SPS-6 Performance at 10 Years

T2 - Evaluation of Concrete Pavement Rehabilitation Strategies

AU - Morian, Dennis A.

AU - Coleman, Laura

AU - Frith, Doug J.

AU - Stoffels, Shelley Marie

AU - Dawood, Dan

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - With a long history of constructing jointed concrete pavements, Pennsylvania pursued the construction of Special Pavement Studies (SPS-6) sections for the rehabilitation of jointed concrete pavements experiment. After 10 years of service under very high loads on rural Interstate highways, a number of sections required renewal. The performances of the eight standard Strategic Highway Research Program sections, a control section, and three state supplemental sections were examined. The experiment included a broad range of treatments, including minimum and maximum concrete pavement restoration, the use of thin and thick overlays, and the use of crack or break and seat as well as rubblization as pretreatments for pavement overlays. Ten years after construction, many of the pavements that received the treatments are in need of major rehabilitation. This provides an opportune time to evaluate both the structural and functional performances of these test sections to date. Additionally, an evaluation of cost-effectiveness showed the importance of performing thorough evaluations of projects for rehabilitation and the potential benefit of rubblization of badly damaged jointed concrete pavements, a method used on the state supplemental sections, as a preoverlay strategy.

AB - With a long history of constructing jointed concrete pavements, Pennsylvania pursued the construction of Special Pavement Studies (SPS-6) sections for the rehabilitation of jointed concrete pavements experiment. After 10 years of service under very high loads on rural Interstate highways, a number of sections required renewal. The performances of the eight standard Strategic Highway Research Program sections, a control section, and three state supplemental sections were examined. The experiment included a broad range of treatments, including minimum and maximum concrete pavement restoration, the use of thin and thick overlays, and the use of crack or break and seat as well as rubblization as pretreatments for pavement overlays. Ten years after construction, many of the pavements that received the treatments are in need of major rehabilitation. This provides an opportune time to evaluate both the structural and functional performances of these test sections to date. Additionally, an evaluation of cost-effectiveness showed the importance of performing thorough evaluations of projects for rehabilitation and the potential benefit of rubblization of badly damaged jointed concrete pavements, a method used on the state supplemental sections, as a preoverlay strategy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0347534058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0347534058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3141/1823-04

DO - 10.3141/1823-04

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0347534058

SP - 28

EP - 38

JO - Transportation Research Record

JF - Transportation Research Record

SN - 0361-1981

IS - 1823

ER -