Perceived Health Reporting Knowledge and News Gathering Practices of Health Journalists and Editors at Community Newspapers

Heather Shoenberger, Shelly Rodgers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This research adds to our understanding of health and science reporting by identifying and examining the numbers, types, and simultaneous uses of resources selected by health and science journalists and editors at the initial stages of reporting, and relates this to journalists’ perceived health reporting knowledge. A telephone survey of 141 health and science journalists and editors selected from 259 community newspapers in Missouri was conducted. Information sources included those that were highly credible, easy to access, already vetted by peers, and that enabled habitual reporting. Though the majority used multiple sources to generate story ideas, about one-third of respondents used no information sources. Journalists and editors’ perceived health reporting knowledge acted as a trigger in prompting more reliance on a wider diversity of information sources, greater use of empirical evidence in health stories, and more time spent researching/writing health stories. Implications for community news organizations include education to improve actual and perceived knowledge of journalists on health and science information gathering.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)205-213
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Health Communication
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 4 2017

Fingerprint

Newspapers
journalist
newspaper
news
editor
Health
health
community
science
Information Science
Health Resources
Health Surveys
Telephone
Information science
health information
source of information
telephone
Organizations
Education
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Communication
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

@article{2ad496d05a20400ea5ae29bdd9ef74f6,
title = "Perceived Health Reporting Knowledge and News Gathering Practices of Health Journalists and Editors at Community Newspapers",
abstract = "This research adds to our understanding of health and science reporting by identifying and examining the numbers, types, and simultaneous uses of resources selected by health and science journalists and editors at the initial stages of reporting, and relates this to journalists’ perceived health reporting knowledge. A telephone survey of 141 health and science journalists and editors selected from 259 community newspapers in Missouri was conducted. Information sources included those that were highly credible, easy to access, already vetted by peers, and that enabled habitual reporting. Though the majority used multiple sources to generate story ideas, about one-third of respondents used no information sources. Journalists and editors’ perceived health reporting knowledge acted as a trigger in prompting more reliance on a wider diversity of information sources, greater use of empirical evidence in health stories, and more time spent researching/writing health stories. Implications for community news organizations include education to improve actual and perceived knowledge of journalists on health and science information gathering.",
author = "Heather Shoenberger and Shelly Rodgers",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/10810730.2016.1266715",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "205--213",
journal = "Journal of Health Communication",
issn = "1081-0730",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Perceived Health Reporting Knowledge and News Gathering Practices of Health Journalists and Editors at Community Newspapers. / Shoenberger, Heather; Rodgers, Shelly.

In: Journal of Health Communication, Vol. 22, No. 3, 04.03.2017, p. 205-213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceived Health Reporting Knowledge and News Gathering Practices of Health Journalists and Editors at Community Newspapers

AU - Shoenberger, Heather

AU - Rodgers, Shelly

PY - 2017/3/4

Y1 - 2017/3/4

N2 - This research adds to our understanding of health and science reporting by identifying and examining the numbers, types, and simultaneous uses of resources selected by health and science journalists and editors at the initial stages of reporting, and relates this to journalists’ perceived health reporting knowledge. A telephone survey of 141 health and science journalists and editors selected from 259 community newspapers in Missouri was conducted. Information sources included those that were highly credible, easy to access, already vetted by peers, and that enabled habitual reporting. Though the majority used multiple sources to generate story ideas, about one-third of respondents used no information sources. Journalists and editors’ perceived health reporting knowledge acted as a trigger in prompting more reliance on a wider diversity of information sources, greater use of empirical evidence in health stories, and more time spent researching/writing health stories. Implications for community news organizations include education to improve actual and perceived knowledge of journalists on health and science information gathering.

AB - This research adds to our understanding of health and science reporting by identifying and examining the numbers, types, and simultaneous uses of resources selected by health and science journalists and editors at the initial stages of reporting, and relates this to journalists’ perceived health reporting knowledge. A telephone survey of 141 health and science journalists and editors selected from 259 community newspapers in Missouri was conducted. Information sources included those that were highly credible, easy to access, already vetted by peers, and that enabled habitual reporting. Though the majority used multiple sources to generate story ideas, about one-third of respondents used no information sources. Journalists and editors’ perceived health reporting knowledge acted as a trigger in prompting more reliance on a wider diversity of information sources, greater use of empirical evidence in health stories, and more time spent researching/writing health stories. Implications for community news organizations include education to improve actual and perceived knowledge of journalists on health and science information gathering.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012298340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012298340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10810730.2016.1266715

DO - 10.1080/10810730.2016.1266715

M3 - Article

C2 - 28248622

AN - SCOPUS:85012298340

VL - 22

SP - 205

EP - 213

JO - Journal of Health Communication

JF - Journal of Health Communication

SN - 1081-0730

IS - 3

ER -