Perceptions of midwestern crop advisors and growers on foliar fungicide adoption and use in maize

Paul Esker, D. A. Shah, C. A. Bradley, S. P. Conley, P. A. Paul, A. E. Robertson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Foliar fungicide use in hybrid maize in the United States was rare before 2000. The decade from 2000 to 2010 saw foliar fungicides increasingly applied to maize in the absence of appreciable disease pressure, a practice seemingly at odds with integrated pest management philosophy. Yet, it is commonly believed that growers do not employ management strategies unless there are perceived benefits. Maize (corn) growers (CGs) and certified crop advisors (CCAs) across four Midwestern states (Iowa, Illinois, Ohio, and Wisconsin) were surveyed to better understand their practices, values and perceptions concerning the use of foliar fungicides during 2005 to 2009. The survey results demonstrated the rapid rise in maize foliar fungicide applications from 2000 through 2008, with 84% of CGs who sprayed having used a foliar fungicide in maize production for the very first time during 2005 to 2009. During 2005 to 2009, 73% of CCAs had recommended using a foliar fungicide, but only 35% of CGs sprayed. Perceived yield gains, conditional on having sprayed, were above the break-even point on average. However, negative yield responses were also observed by almost half of CCAs and a quarter of CGs. Hybrid disease resistance was a more important factor to economically successful maize production than foliar fungicides. Diseases as a yield-limiting factor were more important to CGs than CCAs. As a group, CGs were not as embracing of foliar fungicide as were CCAs, and remained more conservative about the perceived benefits to yield.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1078-1088
Number of pages11
JournalPHYTOPATHOLOGY
Volume108
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

fungicides
growers
corn
crops
integrated pest management
pesticide application
disease resistance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Esker, P., Shah, D. A., Bradley, C. A., Conley, S. P., Paul, P. A., & Robertson, A. E. (2018). Perceptions of midwestern crop advisors and growers on foliar fungicide adoption and use in maize. PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 108(9), 1078-1088. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-10-17-0342-R
Esker, Paul ; Shah, D. A. ; Bradley, C. A. ; Conley, S. P. ; Paul, P. A. ; Robertson, A. E. / Perceptions of midwestern crop advisors and growers on foliar fungicide adoption and use in maize. In: PHYTOPATHOLOGY. 2018 ; Vol. 108, No. 9. pp. 1078-1088.
@article{d4e3f50928e64ec5ba78a65ae90fd893,
title = "Perceptions of midwestern crop advisors and growers on foliar fungicide adoption and use in maize",
abstract = "Foliar fungicide use in hybrid maize in the United States was rare before 2000. The decade from 2000 to 2010 saw foliar fungicides increasingly applied to maize in the absence of appreciable disease pressure, a practice seemingly at odds with integrated pest management philosophy. Yet, it is commonly believed that growers do not employ management strategies unless there are perceived benefits. Maize (corn) growers (CGs) and certified crop advisors (CCAs) across four Midwestern states (Iowa, Illinois, Ohio, and Wisconsin) were surveyed to better understand their practices, values and perceptions concerning the use of foliar fungicides during 2005 to 2009. The survey results demonstrated the rapid rise in maize foliar fungicide applications from 2000 through 2008, with 84{\%} of CGs who sprayed having used a foliar fungicide in maize production for the very first time during 2005 to 2009. During 2005 to 2009, 73{\%} of CCAs had recommended using a foliar fungicide, but only 35{\%} of CGs sprayed. Perceived yield gains, conditional on having sprayed, were above the break-even point on average. However, negative yield responses were also observed by almost half of CCAs and a quarter of CGs. Hybrid disease resistance was a more important factor to economically successful maize production than foliar fungicides. Diseases as a yield-limiting factor were more important to CGs than CCAs. As a group, CGs were not as embracing of foliar fungicide as were CCAs, and remained more conservative about the perceived benefits to yield.",
author = "Paul Esker and Shah, {D. A.} and Bradley, {C. A.} and Conley, {S. P.} and Paul, {P. A.} and Robertson, {A. E.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1094/PHYTO-10-17-0342-R",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "108",
pages = "1078--1088",
journal = "Phytopathology",
issn = "0031-949X",
publisher = "American Phytopathological Society",
number = "9",

}

Perceptions of midwestern crop advisors and growers on foliar fungicide adoption and use in maize. / Esker, Paul; Shah, D. A.; Bradley, C. A.; Conley, S. P.; Paul, P. A.; Robertson, A. E.

In: PHYTOPATHOLOGY, Vol. 108, No. 9, 01.09.2018, p. 1078-1088.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions of midwestern crop advisors and growers on foliar fungicide adoption and use in maize

AU - Esker, Paul

AU - Shah, D. A.

AU - Bradley, C. A.

AU - Conley, S. P.

AU - Paul, P. A.

AU - Robertson, A. E.

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Foliar fungicide use in hybrid maize in the United States was rare before 2000. The decade from 2000 to 2010 saw foliar fungicides increasingly applied to maize in the absence of appreciable disease pressure, a practice seemingly at odds with integrated pest management philosophy. Yet, it is commonly believed that growers do not employ management strategies unless there are perceived benefits. Maize (corn) growers (CGs) and certified crop advisors (CCAs) across four Midwestern states (Iowa, Illinois, Ohio, and Wisconsin) were surveyed to better understand their practices, values and perceptions concerning the use of foliar fungicides during 2005 to 2009. The survey results demonstrated the rapid rise in maize foliar fungicide applications from 2000 through 2008, with 84% of CGs who sprayed having used a foliar fungicide in maize production for the very first time during 2005 to 2009. During 2005 to 2009, 73% of CCAs had recommended using a foliar fungicide, but only 35% of CGs sprayed. Perceived yield gains, conditional on having sprayed, were above the break-even point on average. However, negative yield responses were also observed by almost half of CCAs and a quarter of CGs. Hybrid disease resistance was a more important factor to economically successful maize production than foliar fungicides. Diseases as a yield-limiting factor were more important to CGs than CCAs. As a group, CGs were not as embracing of foliar fungicide as were CCAs, and remained more conservative about the perceived benefits to yield.

AB - Foliar fungicide use in hybrid maize in the United States was rare before 2000. The decade from 2000 to 2010 saw foliar fungicides increasingly applied to maize in the absence of appreciable disease pressure, a practice seemingly at odds with integrated pest management philosophy. Yet, it is commonly believed that growers do not employ management strategies unless there are perceived benefits. Maize (corn) growers (CGs) and certified crop advisors (CCAs) across four Midwestern states (Iowa, Illinois, Ohio, and Wisconsin) were surveyed to better understand their practices, values and perceptions concerning the use of foliar fungicides during 2005 to 2009. The survey results demonstrated the rapid rise in maize foliar fungicide applications from 2000 through 2008, with 84% of CGs who sprayed having used a foliar fungicide in maize production for the very first time during 2005 to 2009. During 2005 to 2009, 73% of CCAs had recommended using a foliar fungicide, but only 35% of CGs sprayed. Perceived yield gains, conditional on having sprayed, were above the break-even point on average. However, negative yield responses were also observed by almost half of CCAs and a quarter of CGs. Hybrid disease resistance was a more important factor to economically successful maize production than foliar fungicides. Diseases as a yield-limiting factor were more important to CGs than CCAs. As a group, CGs were not as embracing of foliar fungicide as were CCAs, and remained more conservative about the perceived benefits to yield.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052074669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052074669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1094/PHYTO-10-17-0342-R

DO - 10.1094/PHYTO-10-17-0342-R

M3 - Article

VL - 108

SP - 1078

EP - 1088

JO - Phytopathology

JF - Phytopathology

SN - 0031-949X

IS - 9

ER -