Perceptions of Nonresident Father Involvement Among Low-Income Youth and Their Single Parents

Joyce A. Arditti, Sonia Molloy, Sara Spiers, Elizabeth I. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To examine sources of theoretical variation in youth and caregiver perceptions of nonresident father involvement. Background: Relationship complexity and environmental factors can result in complicated trajectories of father involvement. We examined both caregiver and youth perceptions of nonresident father–child relationships among low-income, single-parent families that were often affected by paternal incarceration. Method: The present study drew from a sample of families served by a Big Brothers Big Sisters (BBBS) program in a metropolitan region of a Mid-Atlantic state. In-depth interviews with 27 caregivers and their 33 children were the basis of a qualitative analysis. Results: Findings revealed 4 typologies of perceived father involvement: disengaged, sporadic, encouraged, and engaged. Description was thickest regarding the complexities paternal incarceration posed for nonresident fathers' relationships with children and caregivers' attempts to mediate between children and fathers. Conclusion: Narratives about nonresident fathers were situated within complicated ecologies of environmental press such as incarceration, geographic separation, and relationship quality challenges that changed as families adapted to new realities and shifts in kin networks. Maternal mediation between children and their fathers was not a simple judgment and driven by real concerns about children's well-being in highly stigmatized environments or older youths' contact preferences. Implications: Caregivers' concerns about children's fathers need to be understood as part of any programmatic efforts aimed at enhancing coparenting in nonresident-father families. Families with encouraged forms of nonresident-father involvement might be particularly receptive to intervention aimed at facilitating positive father–child relationships.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)68-84
Number of pages17
JournalFamily Relations
Volume68
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

Single Parent
single parent
Fathers
father
low income
Caregivers
caregiver
Siblings
Father-Child Relations
Mid-Atlantic Region
Single-Parent Family
single parent family
child well-being
Ecology
metropolitan region
Child Welfare
mediation
environmental factors
ecology
typology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Arditti, Joyce A. ; Molloy, Sonia ; Spiers, Sara ; Johnson, Elizabeth I. / Perceptions of Nonresident Father Involvement Among Low-Income Youth and Their Single Parents. In: Family Relations. 2019 ; Vol. 68, No. 1. pp. 68-84.
@article{63692fbb00de4382b955b3f760d60e2a,
title = "Perceptions of Nonresident Father Involvement Among Low-Income Youth and Their Single Parents",
abstract = "Objective: To examine sources of theoretical variation in youth and caregiver perceptions of nonresident father involvement. Background: Relationship complexity and environmental factors can result in complicated trajectories of father involvement. We examined both caregiver and youth perceptions of nonresident father–child relationships among low-income, single-parent families that were often affected by paternal incarceration. Method: The present study drew from a sample of families served by a Big Brothers Big Sisters (BBBS) program in a metropolitan region of a Mid-Atlantic state. In-depth interviews with 27 caregivers and their 33 children were the basis of a qualitative analysis. Results: Findings revealed 4 typologies of perceived father involvement: disengaged, sporadic, encouraged, and engaged. Description was thickest regarding the complexities paternal incarceration posed for nonresident fathers' relationships with children and caregivers' attempts to mediate between children and fathers. Conclusion: Narratives about nonresident fathers were situated within complicated ecologies of environmental press such as incarceration, geographic separation, and relationship quality challenges that changed as families adapted to new realities and shifts in kin networks. Maternal mediation between children and their fathers was not a simple judgment and driven by real concerns about children's well-being in highly stigmatized environments or older youths' contact preferences. Implications: Caregivers' concerns about children's fathers need to be understood as part of any programmatic efforts aimed at enhancing coparenting in nonresident-father families. Families with encouraged forms of nonresident-father involvement might be particularly receptive to intervention aimed at facilitating positive father–child relationships.",
author = "Arditti, {Joyce A.} and Sonia Molloy and Sara Spiers and Johnson, {Elizabeth I.}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/fare.12346",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "68--84",
journal = "Family Relations",
issn = "0197-6664",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Perceptions of Nonresident Father Involvement Among Low-Income Youth and Their Single Parents. / Arditti, Joyce A.; Molloy, Sonia; Spiers, Sara; Johnson, Elizabeth I.

In: Family Relations, Vol. 68, No. 1, 01.02.2019, p. 68-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions of Nonresident Father Involvement Among Low-Income Youth and Their Single Parents

AU - Arditti, Joyce A.

AU - Molloy, Sonia

AU - Spiers, Sara

AU - Johnson, Elizabeth I.

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Objective: To examine sources of theoretical variation in youth and caregiver perceptions of nonresident father involvement. Background: Relationship complexity and environmental factors can result in complicated trajectories of father involvement. We examined both caregiver and youth perceptions of nonresident father–child relationships among low-income, single-parent families that were often affected by paternal incarceration. Method: The present study drew from a sample of families served by a Big Brothers Big Sisters (BBBS) program in a metropolitan region of a Mid-Atlantic state. In-depth interviews with 27 caregivers and their 33 children were the basis of a qualitative analysis. Results: Findings revealed 4 typologies of perceived father involvement: disengaged, sporadic, encouraged, and engaged. Description was thickest regarding the complexities paternal incarceration posed for nonresident fathers' relationships with children and caregivers' attempts to mediate between children and fathers. Conclusion: Narratives about nonresident fathers were situated within complicated ecologies of environmental press such as incarceration, geographic separation, and relationship quality challenges that changed as families adapted to new realities and shifts in kin networks. Maternal mediation between children and their fathers was not a simple judgment and driven by real concerns about children's well-being in highly stigmatized environments or older youths' contact preferences. Implications: Caregivers' concerns about children's fathers need to be understood as part of any programmatic efforts aimed at enhancing coparenting in nonresident-father families. Families with encouraged forms of nonresident-father involvement might be particularly receptive to intervention aimed at facilitating positive father–child relationships.

AB - Objective: To examine sources of theoretical variation in youth and caregiver perceptions of nonresident father involvement. Background: Relationship complexity and environmental factors can result in complicated trajectories of father involvement. We examined both caregiver and youth perceptions of nonresident father–child relationships among low-income, single-parent families that were often affected by paternal incarceration. Method: The present study drew from a sample of families served by a Big Brothers Big Sisters (BBBS) program in a metropolitan region of a Mid-Atlantic state. In-depth interviews with 27 caregivers and their 33 children were the basis of a qualitative analysis. Results: Findings revealed 4 typologies of perceived father involvement: disengaged, sporadic, encouraged, and engaged. Description was thickest regarding the complexities paternal incarceration posed for nonresident fathers' relationships with children and caregivers' attempts to mediate between children and fathers. Conclusion: Narratives about nonresident fathers were situated within complicated ecologies of environmental press such as incarceration, geographic separation, and relationship quality challenges that changed as families adapted to new realities and shifts in kin networks. Maternal mediation between children and their fathers was not a simple judgment and driven by real concerns about children's well-being in highly stigmatized environments or older youths' contact preferences. Implications: Caregivers' concerns about children's fathers need to be understood as part of any programmatic efforts aimed at enhancing coparenting in nonresident-father families. Families with encouraged forms of nonresident-father involvement might be particularly receptive to intervention aimed at facilitating positive father–child relationships.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059168798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059168798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/fare.12346

DO - 10.1111/fare.12346

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85059168798

VL - 68

SP - 68

EP - 84

JO - Family Relations

JF - Family Relations

SN - 0197-6664

IS - 1

ER -