Personal and collective evaluations of the 2010 health care reform

Lilliard Richardson, David M. Konisky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 2010 health care reform law has been as controversial as any piece of American legislation in recent memory. Although numerous polls have been conducted on the public's views of the reform, we do not know much about how citizens evaluated the policy alternatives. Are citizens more focused on howpolicy affects them personally or how it affects the nation as a whole? Further, are these evaluations made more on the basis of past experience or assessments of howthe policy will affect the future? Using an original survey of public opinion administered during the 2009 congressional debate, we examine how these evaluative dimensions (and several other factors) shaped public support for overall reform, for associated policy goals, and for available policy tools. We find evidence that retrospective and prospective collective evaluations mattered most, as did personal prospective assessments, but evidence on personal retrospective factors is somewhat mixed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)921-956
Number of pages36
JournalJournal of health politics, policy and law
Volume38
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2013

Fingerprint

Health Care Reform
Public Opinion
Legislation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{6e6b31eb223940fc8bffd8b52a502083,
title = "Personal and collective evaluations of the 2010 health care reform",
abstract = "The 2010 health care reform law has been as controversial as any piece of American legislation in recent memory. Although numerous polls have been conducted on the public's views of the reform, we do not know much about how citizens evaluated the policy alternatives. Are citizens more focused on howpolicy affects them personally or how it affects the nation as a whole? Further, are these evaluations made more on the basis of past experience or assessments of howthe policy will affect the future? Using an original survey of public opinion administered during the 2009 congressional debate, we examine how these evaluative dimensions (and several other factors) shaped public support for overall reform, for associated policy goals, and for available policy tools. We find evidence that retrospective and prospective collective evaluations mattered most, as did personal prospective assessments, but evidence on personal retrospective factors is somewhat mixed.",
author = "Lilliard Richardson and Konisky, {David M.}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1215/03616878-2334665",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "921--956",
journal = "Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law",
issn = "0361-6878",
publisher = "Duke University Press",
number = "5",

}

Personal and collective evaluations of the 2010 health care reform. / Richardson, Lilliard; Konisky, David M.

In: Journal of health politics, policy and law, Vol. 38, No. 5, 01.10.2013, p. 921-956.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Personal and collective evaluations of the 2010 health care reform

AU - Richardson, Lilliard

AU - Konisky, David M.

PY - 2013/10/1

Y1 - 2013/10/1

N2 - The 2010 health care reform law has been as controversial as any piece of American legislation in recent memory. Although numerous polls have been conducted on the public's views of the reform, we do not know much about how citizens evaluated the policy alternatives. Are citizens more focused on howpolicy affects them personally or how it affects the nation as a whole? Further, are these evaluations made more on the basis of past experience or assessments of howthe policy will affect the future? Using an original survey of public opinion administered during the 2009 congressional debate, we examine how these evaluative dimensions (and several other factors) shaped public support for overall reform, for associated policy goals, and for available policy tools. We find evidence that retrospective and prospective collective evaluations mattered most, as did personal prospective assessments, but evidence on personal retrospective factors is somewhat mixed.

AB - The 2010 health care reform law has been as controversial as any piece of American legislation in recent memory. Although numerous polls have been conducted on the public's views of the reform, we do not know much about how citizens evaluated the policy alternatives. Are citizens more focused on howpolicy affects them personally or how it affects the nation as a whole? Further, are these evaluations made more on the basis of past experience or assessments of howthe policy will affect the future? Using an original survey of public opinion administered during the 2009 congressional debate, we examine how these evaluative dimensions (and several other factors) shaped public support for overall reform, for associated policy goals, and for available policy tools. We find evidence that retrospective and prospective collective evaluations mattered most, as did personal prospective assessments, but evidence on personal retrospective factors is somewhat mixed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890023371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890023371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1215/03616878-2334665

DO - 10.1215/03616878-2334665

M3 - Article

C2 - 23794738

AN - SCOPUS:84890023371

VL - 38

SP - 921

EP - 956

JO - Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

JF - Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

SN - 0361-6878

IS - 5

ER -